In Bangkok this week, the International Monetary Fund offered the world a cautiously reassuring number—3.1% global growth—while quietly revealing how precarious the architecture beneath it has become. A war in the Middle East has kept oil above $100 a barrel, yet the global economy has not buckled, held upright almost entirely by the extraordinary surge in artificial intelligence investment. What the headline conceals is a deepening divergence: fewer and fewer nations are sharing in the expansion, debt burdens are mounting, and the very pillar sustaining growth—AI spending—carries its own frag
IMF: AI Investment Sustains 3% Global Growth, But War and Debt Pose Rising Risks
Just 32 countries now account for 95% of global growth
Mark
So the IMF is saying growth is holding up at 3.1%—that sounds fine. Why should anyone worry?
Mimi
Because that growth is almost entirely dependent on AI investment right now. Without it, we'd be at 2.5% or lower. It's a single pillar holding up the whole structure.
Luke
And we should note—the IMF is forecasting that AI will deliver the productivity gains investors expect. That's an assumption, not a certainty. If it doesn't pan out, the downside is severe.
Mark
How severe?
Mimi
If AI investment collapses and productivity doesn't materialize, US GDP could fall 0.8% directly. Add in the spillovers to Asia and the financial tightening, and you're looking at a 1.1% global contraction by 2028.
Luke
That's the IMF's own scenario modeling. It's not a prediction—it's a stress test. But it's worth taking seriously.
Mark
And the Middle East war is making this worse?
Mimi
It's keeping oil above $100 a barrel. The IMF assumes it will ease and prices will fall to $87 by 2027. But if the conflict drags on and oil hits $130, growth gets cut another 0.5 percentage point and inflation jumps to 5.2%.
Mark
So we're betting on two things: AI keeps delivering, and the war winds down. What if neither happens?
Luke
Then you have stagflation and a much sharper slowdown. But the IMF's baseline assumes both things stabilize. That's their working scenario.
Mark
What about the countries getting left behind? The IMF said only 32 countries account for 95% of growth now.
Mimi
That's the real story. In April, it was 54 countries. The divergence is accelerating. Gulf states are contracting 3% to 16%. Most of the developing world is being downgraded. They're not benefiting from AI, they're being hit by the oil shock, and their debt loads are rising.
Luke
And the IMF is warning about debt in advanced economies too. If borrowing costs spike, that becomes a growth drag on top of everything else.
Mark
So what's the actual risk here—is it the war, AI, or debt?
Mimi
It's all three, and they're interconnected. The war drives oil prices, which hurts growth. If growth disappoints, AI investment could reverse. If that happens, debt becomes unsustainable because growth can't service it.
Luke
The IMF is essentially saying: we're okay for now, but the margin for error is very small, and we're running out of time to fix the structural problems.
The Pulse
- A Middle East conflict pushing oil past $100 a barrel should have tipped the world into contraction, yet AI infrastructure spending has so far absorbed the blow and kept global growth just above the 3% stability threshold.
- The circle of prosperity is shrinking fast—only 32 countries now generate 95% of global growth, down from 54 in April, while Gulf economies like Saudi Arabia face contractions as severe as 16.7% in a single year.
- The IMF's own models warn that if AI fails to deliver the productivity gains investors expect, a collapse in that spending alone could erase 1.1% of global output by 2028, with the United States losing nearly 1.8%.
- An adverse scenario where war escalates and oil reaches $130 a barrel would cut growth by half a percentage point next year and send 2027 inflation surging to 5.2%, well above baseline projections.
- Beneath every risk sits an unresolved debt crisis—elevated public borrowing in advanced economies leaves governments with little buffer, and the IMF is pressing them to stop delaying fiscal reform before the window closes entirely.
In Bangkok this week, the International Monetary Fund offered the world a cautiously reassuring number—3.1% global growth—while quietly revealing how precarious the architecture beneath it has become. A war in the Middle East has kept oil above $100 a barrel, yet the global economy has not buckled, held upright almost entirely by the extraordinary surge in artificial intelligence investment. What the headline conceals is a deepening divergence: fewer and fewer nations are sharing in the expansion, debt burdens are mounting, and the very pillar sustaining growth—AI spending—carries its own fragility should investors begin to doubt its promise.
The International Monetary Fund delivered its latest global outlook this week from Bangkok, where it is co-hosting annual meetings with the World Bank. The headline figure—3.1% growth for 2026—sits just above the threshold economists associate with stability. But the IMF's chief economist Silvana Tenreyro was candid: without the historic surge in artificial intelligence investment, the world would already be contracting. A war in the Middle East has kept oil prices above $100 a barrel, inflicting serious damage on energy-importing nations. AI spending, concentrated in countries building platforms and manufacturing chips, has more than compensated—for now.
The resilience, however, is unevenly distributed to a troubling degree. In April, 54 countries accounted for 95% of global growth. That figure has fallen to just 32. The IMF has downgraded nearly half of all economies since spring. The Gulf states are bearing the sharpest pain: Saudi Arabia, once expected to grow 1.7%, is now forecast to contract 3.3%. Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE face contractions ranging from roughly 4% to nearly 17%. Among major developed economies, the United States holds at 2.3% growth, the eurozone edges up to 1.1%, and India leads all large economies at 7.0%. China, weighed down by high oil prices and weak domestic demand, has been trimmed to 4.5%.
The nations benefiting most are those supplying AI hardware or hosting its infrastructure—South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, and Thailand among them. But the IMF warns this concentration is itself a vulnerability. If investors reassess AI's ability to deliver real productivity gains and pull back, US GDP could fall 0.8% directly, with global spillovers pushing total output down 1.1% by 2028. The IMF's baseline assumes the Strait of Hormuz reopens in early 2027 and oil averages $96 a barrel this year. In a darker scenario where conflict intensifies and oil reaches $130, growth takes an additional hit and inflation climbs to 5.2% in 2027.
Running beneath all of these risks is a debt problem that governments have been reluctant to confront. Elevated public borrowing in advanced economies leaves little room to absorb shocks, and a sudden spike in borrowing costs could severely constrain growth. The IMF left Bangkok with an urgent message: the global economy is still expanding, but the foundation is narrowing, the risks are compounding, and the time for credible fiscal reform is running short.
The International Monetary Fund released its latest economic forecast in Bangkok this week, and the headline is reassuring: the global economy will grow at 3.1% in 2026, just above the 3% threshold that signals stability. But the story beneath that number is far more complicated, and it hinges on a single, fragile prop: artificial intelligence investment.
Without the surge in AI spending, the IMF's chief economist Silvana Tenreyro explained, the world would be contracting right now. A war in the Middle East has kept oil prices above $100 a barrel, draining resources from energy importers and destabilizing entire regions. The energy shock should have crushed growth. Instead, the massive capital flowing into AI infrastructure—particularly in countries building the platforms and manufacturing the chips—has more than compensated. The IMF upgraded its forecast slightly from July, when it predicted 3.0% growth. For 2027, it expects 3.4% growth, essentially flat with earlier predictions.
But this resilience masks a widening chasm. Just 32 countries now account for 95% of global growth. In April, that figure was 54 countries. The divergence is stark and accelerating. The IMF has downgraded growth forecasts for 47% of all economies since April, leaving vast swaths of the developing world behind. The Gulf states have been hit hardest. Saudi Arabia, which the IMF expected to grow 1.7% in July, is now forecast to contract 3.3% this year. Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates face even steeper declines—contractions ranging from 3.9% to 16.7% in 2026. These are not marginal adjustments. They represent economies in freefall.
Among the major developed economies, the picture is mixed. The United States is expected to grow 2.3% both this year and next, held up by consumer spending, tax cuts, and AI investment, though the benefits are partially offset by the high import content of AI hardware. The eurozone, upgraded to 1.1% growth for 2026, is benefiting from AI investment and higher defense spending. Britain received a 0.3 percentage point upgrade to 1.3%, also driven by AI. China, meanwhile, is slowing—the IMF cut its 2026 forecast to 4.5%, down 0.1 percentage point from July, as higher oil prices weigh on an economy already struggling with weak domestic demand. India remains the fastest-growing major economy at 7.0% for both years, upgraded from earlier forecasts.
The countries gaining most from AI are those supplying the hardware or building the platforms: South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, and Thailand, which is hosting the IMF and World Bank annual meetings this week. Their growth forecasts have been upgraded. But this concentration of benefit is precisely what worries the IMF. Tenreyro warned that a prolonged Middle East conflict could push inflation higher and slow growth further. A reassessment of AI profitability—the possibility that the technology fails to deliver the productivity gains investors expect—poses an even larger threat. If investment collapses, the IMF models show US GDP could fall 0.8% directly, with spillovers to Asian technology exporters adding another 0.4% global impact by 2028. Combined with tighter financial conditions and reduced consumption, total global output could shrink by 1.1% by 2028, with the US losing 1.8%.
The IMF's baseline scenario assumes the Strait of Hormuz will reopen in March 2027 and normal shipping will resume by October. It prices oil at an average of $96 per barrel for 2026 and $87 for 2027. But in an adverse scenario where the war worsens and oil reaches $130 per barrel through the first quarter of 2027, growth would be cut by 0.2 percentage point this year and 0.5 percentage point next year. Inflation in 2027 would surge to 5.2%, up 1.1 percentage points from the baseline forecast.
Underlying all of this is a debt problem that officials say governments have been avoiding. Public debt levels in advanced economies are elevated, and if borrowing costs spike—a real risk if investors lose confidence—growth could be severely constrained. The IMF is urging governments to stop delaying fiscal reform and to articulate credible plans to bring debt back to sustainable levels. That message will be central to the conversations happening in Bangkok this week. The global economy is still growing, but the foundation is narrowing, the risks are multiplying, and the window for preventive action is closing.
Notable Quotes
The global economy has been resilient, but that resilience is under strain, with risks to growth tilted to the downside.— Silvana Tenreyro, IMF chief economist
A prolonged conflict in the Middle East could put additional pressures on inflation and slow down growth. A worsening of fiscal prospects, a reassessment of AI profitability, and extreme weather events could further weaken the outlook.— Silvana Tenreyro, IMF chief economist
Want the full story?
Read the original at Euronext Markets: Real-time Stock Market Data | live ↗
Economy & Finance