In Bangkok this week, the International Monetary Fund offered the world a cautiously hopeful number — 3.1 percent global growth — while quietly acknowledging that the number conceals as much as it reveals. Artificial intelligence investment has become an unlikely stabilizer, absorbing some of the damage from a Middle East war that has kept oil above $100 a barrel and pushed entire oil-producing nations into deep recession. The gains of this moment are real but narrowing, flowing to fewer countries and fewer people, while the risks — prolonged conflict, AI disappointment, unsustainable debt — g
IMF: AI investment sustains 3% global growth, but Middle East war and debt pose risks
Resilience is under strain, with risks tilted to the downside
Mark
So the IMF is saying growth is holding up at 3.1 percent. That sounds like good news. Why should anyone worry?
Mimi
Because that 3.1 percent is not evenly distributed. Thirty-two countries account for 95 percent of global growth now. In April, it was 54 countries. That means the gains are concentrating in places with AI infrastructure or AI supply chains, while nearly half of all economies have been downgraded since April.
Luke
But wait—the IMF upgraded the forecast from 3.0 percent in July to 3.1 percent now. If nearly half of economies were downgraded, how did the global number go up?
Mimi
Because the countries that were upgraded—the AI winners—were upgraded significantly. South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Thailand, the US, the eurozone, India. Their upgrades outweighed the downgrades everywhere else.
Mark
And the Middle East war is making this worse?
Mimi
Much worse. Saudi Arabia went from a forecast of 1.7 percent growth to a 3.3 percent contraction. Iraq is expected to shrink by 16 percent. Kuwait by 16.7 percent. These are not small numbers.
Luke
But the IMF's baseline assumes the Strait of Hormuz reopens in March 2027 and shipping returns to normal by October. That is a very specific assumption. How confident are they in that?
Mimi
They do not say. They model an adverse scenario where oil reaches $130 a barrel and stays there through the first quarter of 2027. In that case, global growth falls by 0.5 percentage point in 2027 and inflation surges by 1.1 percentage point.
Mark
What about AI? Is that the real driver of growth?
Mimi
It is the main reason growth did not fall further. But the IMF also flags AI as a huge source of uncertainty. If productivity gains fail to materialize and investment collapses, US GDP could fall by 0.8 percent directly, with global output falling by 1.1 percent by 2028.
Luke
That is a scenario, not a forecast. The baseline still assumes AI investment continues and pays off. We should be clear about that distinction.
Mark
So what is the IMF actually worried about?
Mimi
Three things: a prolonged Middle East war, a reassessment of AI profitability, and elevated public debt in advanced economies. Any one of those could trigger a sharp slowdown. All three together could be severe.
Der Puls
- A war that was supposed to be brief has outlasted its own assumptions, keeping oil above $100 a barrel and forcing the IMF to model scenarios where prices reach $130 and global growth unravels by half a percentage point.
- AI infrastructure spending has become the world economy's unlikely shock absorber, but it is propping up a shrinking club — just 32 countries now generate 95 percent of global growth, down from 54 in April.
- The Gulf states are not merely slowing — Saudi Arabia is contracting 3.3 percent, Iraq 16 percent, Kuwait 16.7 percent — recessions of a depth that signal structural rupture, not cyclical dip.
- The IMF's chief economist warns that every pillar of the current resilience carries its own downside: AI investment could reverse sharply if productivity gains disappoint, erasing up to 1.1 percent of global output by 2028.
- Governments in advanced economies, carrying debt loads the IMF calls dangerous, are being urged to act before rising borrowing costs make the choice for them — a fiscal reckoning deferred but not escaped.
In Bangkok this week, the International Monetary Fund offered the world a cautiously hopeful number — 3.1 percent global growth — while quietly acknowledging that the number conceals as much as it reveals. Artificial intelligence investment has become an unlikely stabilizer, absorbing some of the damage from a Middle East war that has kept oil above $100 a barrel and pushed entire oil-producing nations into deep recession. The gains of this moment are real but narrowing, flowing to fewer countries and fewer people, while the risks — prolonged conflict, AI disappointment, unsustainable debt — grow heavier with each passing quarter.
The IMF released its latest World Economic Outlook on Tuesday in Bangkok, offering a headline that felt almost reassuring: 3.1 percent global growth this year, a slight improvement over the July forecast. But the number is doing a great deal of work to conceal a more fractured reality beneath it.
The Middle East war has proven more durable and more costly than anticipated. Oil has remained above $100 a barrel — a shock that would ordinarily drag global growth well below 3 percent. What has kept the forecast afloat is the remarkable surge in AI infrastructure investment, which has offset much of the energy damage. Emergency measures — strategic reserve drawdowns, alternative suppliers, demand reduction — bought time in the early months, but their power is fading. Without them, the IMF estimates growth would have fallen to 2.5 percent.
The divergence between winners and losers has sharpened dramatically. Countries supplying AI hardware or building AI platforms — South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Thailand — have seen their forecasts upgraded. The United States is expected to grow 2.3 percent, the eurozone 1.1 percent, India a world-leading 7.0 percent. But 47 percent of all economies have been downgraded since April, and the Gulf states have been hit with particular severity. Saudi Arabia, forecast to grow 1.7 percent in July, is now expected to contract 3.3 percent. Iraq faces a 16 percent contraction. Kuwait, 16.7 percent. These are not adjustments — they are deep recessions in nations that anchor global energy supply.
IMF chief economist Silvana Tenreyro framed the moment carefully: resilience is real, but it is under strain, and the risks tilt downward. A worsening conflict could push oil to $130 a barrel, shaving half a percentage point from 2027 growth and driving inflation to 5.2 percent. A reassessment of AI's actual productivity gains could trigger a sharp investment pullback, with cascading effects on asset prices, consumption, and global output — potentially a 1.1 percent contraction by 2028. And elevated public debt in advanced economies, long deferred as a problem, is becoming urgent as borrowing costs rise.
The IMF's baseline assumes the Strait of Hormuz reopens in early 2027 and oil averages $87 a barrel next year. It is a forecast built on assumptions that feel fragile. The world economy is still growing — but the circle of beneficiaries is tightening, the risks are compounding, and the margin for error is narrower than the headline suggests.
The International Monetary Fund released its latest economic forecast on Tuesday in Bangkok, and the headline was reassuring: the world economy will grow by 3.1 percent this year, slightly better than the 3.0 percent the fund predicted just three months earlier. But beneath that steady number lies a more complicated picture—one where artificial intelligence investment is propping up growth in some corners of the globe while entire regions sink into recession, and where a prolonged war in the Middle East keeps oil prices stubbornly high, threatening to unravel the gains.
The war has been more costly and more durable than many expected. Oil has stayed above $100 a barrel, a shock that would normally drag down global growth significantly. Yet the forecast improved slightly from July, not because the conflict resolved but because investment in AI infrastructure has been so robust that it is offsetting the energy damage. Countries and companies moved quickly to cushion the blow—drawing down oil reserves, finding alternative suppliers, cutting demand—but those emergency measures are losing their power as the war drags on. Without those initial adjustments, the IMF estimates global growth would have fallen to 2.5 percent this year instead of 3.1 percent.
The real story, though, is not about the global average. It is about who benefits and who does not. Just 32 countries now account for 95 percent of global growth, compared to 54 countries in April. The divergence is stark. Nations building AI platforms or supplying the hardware that powers them—South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Thailand—have seen their growth forecasts upgraded. The United States is expected to grow at 2.3 percent, supported by strong consumer spending, tax cuts, and AI investment. The eurozone got an upgrade to 1.1 percent growth, lifted by AI infrastructure spending and defense spending in European countries. India remains the world's fastest-growing major economy at 7.0 percent. But India is an outlier.
Meanwhile, 47 percent of all economies have been downgraded since April. The Gulf states have been hit hardest. Saudi Arabia, which the IMF predicted would grow by 1.7 percent in July, is now forecast to contract by 3.3 percent. Iran faces a 7.6 percent contraction. Iraq is expected to shrink by 16 percent. Kuwait by 16.7 percent. Qatar by 15.6 percent. The United Arab Emirates by 3.9 percent. These are not modest adjustments. They represent deep recessions in some of the world's most important oil-producing nations, driven by the direct impact of the US-Israeli war against Iran.
Silvana Tenreyro, the IMF's new chief economist, put it plainly: "The global economy has been resilient, but that resilience is under strain, with risks to growth tilted to the downside." She listed the threats: a prolonged Middle East conflict could push inflation higher and slow growth further; a reassessment of whether AI investments will actually pay off could trigger a sharp pullback in spending; extreme weather could weaken the outlook; and elevated public debt in advanced economies could force governments to pay much higher borrowing costs, which would weigh on growth.
The IMF's baseline forecast assumes the Strait of Hormuz will reopen in March 2027 and shipping will return to normal by October. It assumes oil will average $96 a barrel this year and $87 next year. But the fund also modeled a darker scenario: if the war worsens and oil reaches $130 a barrel through the first quarter of 2027, global growth would fall by 0.2 percentage point in 2026 and 0.5 percentage point in 2027. Inflation would surge by another 1.1 percentage point to 5.2 percent in 2027.
Artificial intelligence itself is a source of enormous uncertainty. If adoption accelerates and investment surges, global GDP could rise an additional 0.6 percent by 2029, with most of the gains flowing to the United States and China. But if the productivity gains fail to materialize—if companies realize they have overpaid for AI infrastructure and pull back sharply—the damage could be severe. US GDP could fall by 0.8 percent directly, with spillovers to Asian technology exporters adding another 0.4 percent global impact by 2028. Asset prices would drop, financial conditions would tighten, consumption would collapse, and global output could fall by 1.1 percent by 2028, including a 1.8 percent drop in the United States alone.
The IMF also warned that public debt levels, particularly in advanced economies, have reached dangerous heights. Governments have delayed action to rebuild their fiscal buffers, and the fund is urging them to articulate credible plans to bring debt back to sustainable levels. That message will be a central theme at the Bangkok meetings this week, where global economic and finance leaders are gathering. The fund's forecast shows a world economy that is still growing, but one where the benefits are narrowing, the risks are multiplying, and the margin for error is shrinking.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
The global economy has been resilient, but that resilience is under strain, with risks to growth tilted to the downside.— Silvana Tenreyro, IMF chief economist
Global growth would have fallen to 2.5% this year without emergency measures like drawing down oil reserves and cutting demand, but their effect is fading as the war drags on.— Petya Koeva Brooks, IMF deputy research director
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Al-Monitor ↗
Economy & Finance