Toxic dump becomes election flashpoint in Makerfield byelection

Residents report rats in homes, children unable to play outdoors, school closures during nine-day fire, and health impacts from toxic fumes affecting families.
He's one of us, so I think he will do something.
An 82-year-old resident explains why she's backing Andy Burnham to remove the toxic dump.

The dump, one of the UK's largest illegal waste sites, has caused fires, rat infestations, and health hazards while remaining uncleared for over a year and a half. Residents cite the swift cleanup of a similar Oxfordshire dump as evidence of north-south divide, with criminal gangs profiting £1bn annually from waste crime.

  • 25,000 tonnes of illegal waste dumped on Bolton House Road, Bickershaw, for 20+ months
  • Dump caught fire for 9 days in summer 2025, forcing school closure and residents indoors
  • Waste crime costs UK economy approximately £1 billion annually in cleanup and lost revenue
  • Similar Oxfordshire dump cleared within weeks after parliamentary intervention; Bickershaw remains uncleared
  • Makerfield byelection on June 18th, 2026

A 25,000-tonne illegal waste dump in Bickershaw has sat for 20 months next to a primary school, becoming a symbol of regional inequality and a key issue in the Makerfield byelection as residents demand action.

Behind a metal fence on Bolton House Road in Bickershaw sits a mountain of rubbish that has not moved in more than twenty months. Twenty-five thousand tonnes of household and trade waste—one of the largest illegal dumps in the country—occupies a residential street, metres from a primary school where children once played in fields now shadowed by the pile. In the summer of 2025, the dump caught fire and burned for nine days. The school closed. Residents sealed themselves indoors to escape the fumes.

The waste arrived in October 2024 when lorries began appearing on the street. By January, twenty or thirty trucks were coming daily. Criminal gangs had found a profitable trade: divert rubbish away from legitimate landfills, pocket the £130.75-per-tonne tax that should have gone to the government, and leave the neighbourhood to absorb the cost. The economics are staggering. Waste crime costs the British economy roughly a billion pounds annually in cleanup, lost legitimate business, and evaded taxes. The gangs make millions. The people of Bickershaw live with rats in their homes and cars, with a smell that shifts seasonally from methane-sharp to rotting-flesh thick, with children too sick to stay in their own houses.

Nicha Rowson, a beautician who lives a few doors from the dump, has watched her youngest son spend five or six nights a week at his grandmother's place because the smell makes him ill. She points to what happened in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, when a similar illegal dump was discovered last year. Within weeks, after parliamentary pressure, the Environment Agency announced it would spend millions clearing that site—a departure from its usual practice of forcing landowners and criminal enterprises to pay. The Oxfordshire dump is being removed. The Bickershaw dump remains. "If you look at the Oxfordshire one, that got agreed to be tidied up relatively quickly," Rowson said. "Well, this has already been on fire, for nine days, so it's a north and south divide yet again."

As the Makerfield byelection approaches on June 18th, the dump has become the measure by which residents judge the candidates' promises. The outgoing Labour MP, Josh Simons, campaigned publicly to have it cleared. Earlier this year, the government announced the Environment Agency would remove it at taxpayer expense. Yet the rubbish still sits there. Andy Burnham, the Manchester mayor running to retain the seat for Labour against Reform UK's Robert Kenyon, has mentioned the dump in election leaflets and worked with Simons to pressure authorities. Reform has seized on it as evidence of national decline under successive governments, with deputy leader Richard Tice announcing a "national action day" on July 4th to tackle waste crime through increased fines and enforcement.

But in Bickershaw, most residents are placing their faith in Burnham. Colin Peters, a retired IT worker, noted that Burnham is the only candidate who has actually mentioned the dump in his campaign materials. "He's obviously from this area," Peters said, "so he might actually put things forward with more to do with the north-west of the UK, rather than everything being concentrated in the south-east and south." Doris, eighty-two, put it more simply: "He's one of us." Rowson said Burnham had already helped her and given her confidence he would continue pushing. She believes he could change "that north and south divide; that's the big one."

Marilyn Naylor, who lives opposite the school fields, acknowledged the political calculation. "I mean, he's done so much for Manchester, hasn't he? I think the problem now is when it's being said that he's only doing this to get in, which he may be, but he has to get in somewhere, doesn't he?" She too is backing Burnham. One woman, asked about the dump's future, simply said as she drove away: "It'll still be there in five years' time."

The Environment Agency says important preparatory steps must be completed before the clearance operation can begin, and that once these are done, removal should proceed swiftly. The duchy of Lancaster, which now owns the land after the original owners could not be traced, said it remains committed to working with Wigan council and the agency to address the issue. For residents breathing the air of Bickershaw, these assurances feel distant. The dump is not just waste. It is a test of whether anyone in power actually listens to the north.

If you look at the Oxfordshire one, that got agreed to be tidied up relatively quickly, and that was due to it being a fire hazard. Well, this has already been on fire, for nine days, so it's a north and south divide yet again.
— Nicha Rowson, beautician living near the dump
He's the only one, out of all the bumf we've been getting through the post, who's actually mentioned the dump. Does that tell you he might be the one who's going to actually do something, or listen to people?
— Colin Peters, retired IT worker
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why has this particular dump become so politically charged when illegal waste sites exist across the country?

Model

Because it's not hidden. It's on a residential street next to a school where children play. People see it every day, smell it, live with the rats it brings. It's impossible to ignore or abstract away.

Inventor

And the comparison to Oxfordshire—is that fair, or are the residents cherry-picking?

Model

It's fair enough to ask why one got cleared quickly and the other hasn't. The Oxfordshire dump got parliamentary attention and millions in government money. Bickershaw got promises. The speed difference is real, and residents notice.

Inventor

Do people actually believe Burnham will remove it, or are they voting for him because they have no other option?

Model

Both, probably. He's at least mentioned it publicly and worked on it before. The others haven't. In a place that feels forgotten, that matters. But there's also a kind of resignation underneath—one woman said it'll still be there in five years.

Inventor

What's the actual barrier to removal right now?

Model

The Environment Agency says preparatory steps need to happen first. But no one seems to know what those steps are or how long they'll take. That opacity is part of the problem. People are tired of waiting.

Inventor

And the criminals making money off this—are they ever caught?

Model

Rarely. The gangs divert waste, pocket the landfill tax, and disappear. It's a billion-pound-a-year crime with minimal enforcement. The cost falls on the neighbourhood, not the perpetrators.

Contact Us FAQ