Iceland to submit bill banning commercial whaling, leaving only Norway and Japan

Approximately 80 fin whales have been killed in Icelandic waters so far in 2026, with up to 150 permitted under the annual quota.
A law to stop the killing can't come soon enough
Animal welfare advocate on Iceland's proposed ban on commercial whaling in its waters.
Mark

So Iceland is actually going to ban whaling? That seems like a big shift.

Mimi

They're submitting a bill in February 2027 that would ban it, yes. But it's not quite done yet—it still has to pass.

Mark

What changed their mind?

Mimi

A government report from 2023. They commissioned it themselves, and it found that harpooned whales were taking about two hours to die. That finding really shifted things.

Luke

Two hours—is that measured from the harpoon strike to death, or from capture to death? The source doesn't specify, and that matters for how we understand the suffering.

Mimi

Fair point. The source just says the whales took two hours to die. The report triggered a temporary suspension that year, and now the industries minister is calling the whaling laws outdated.

Mark

How many whales are we talking about?

Mimi

This year through early September, 80 fin whales have been caught. The quota allows up to 150 for the whole season.

Luke

And those are fin whales specifically—the second-largest animals on Earth, classified as vulnerable to extinction. That's important context.

Mark

If Iceland bans it, what happens to the other countries?

Mimi

Norway and Japan would be the only two left doing commercial whaling. Right now it's just those three.

Luke

Though there's a wrinkle: Iceland's current whaling permits don't expire until 2029. Even if the ban passes, the existing company—Hvalur—might be allowed to keep hunting until then.

Mimi

Exactly. Animal welfare groups acknowledge that's likely, even though they'd prefer an immediate stop.

Mark

So the ban might not actually end whaling in Iceland for another three years?

Luke

That's the realistic scenario based on what's in the reporting. The bill is about the future, but the present has legal obligations.

  • A 2023 government-commissioned report revealed harpooned whales took up to two hours to die — a finding so damning it forced an immediate, if temporary, suspension of hunting.
  • Iceland's industries minister has declared the country's whaling laws outdated, and the government plans to submit a permanent ban bill in February 2027, backed by strong political and public momentum.
  • Animal welfare advocates are calling the move a watershed moment, citing ethical, veterinary, legal, and conservation grounds — but warn that existing permits held by the sole remaining whaling company may allow hunting to continue until 2029.
  • As of early September 2026, 80 fin whales — a vulnerable species — have already been killed this season, with the quota permitting up to 150 before the hunt closes at month's end.
  • If the legislation succeeds, Iceland's exit would reduce the world's commercial whaling nations to just two, deepening the global isolation of a practice most countries abandoned after the 1986 international moratorium.

For decades, Iceland has stood among a dwindling handful of nations still permitting the commercial hunt of whales — creatures whose suffering, a government's own report confirmed, can stretch across two agonizing hours after the harpoon strikes. Now, in a gesture that reflects both evolving moral sensibility and the weight of scientific evidence, Iceland's government is preparing legislation that would permanently close this chapter. If passed, the ban would leave only Norway and Japan as the last practitioners of a trade the world has largely chosen to leave behind.

Iceland's government is preparing to submit legislation in February 2027 that would permanently ban commercial whaling in its waters — a move that would leave only Norway and Japan still permitting the hunt. The push traces directly to a 2023 report commissioned by Iceland's own government, which found that harpooned whales were taking approximately two hours to die. The findings triggered immediate pressure, a temporary suspension of hunting, and have since anchored the case for a permanent end to the industry.

Industries minister Hanna Katrín Friðriksson has described Iceland's whaling laws as outdated and called for reform. Animal welfare advocates have welcomed the announcement as a significant milestone, pointing to what they describe as compelling ethical, veterinary, legal, and conservation reasons for the ban to succeed — alongside considerable public support.

The practical timeline, however, is complicated. Only one company still operates in Iceland's whaling industry: Hvalur, owned by Kristján Loftsson, which holds a government-issued permit running until 2029. Even if the ban passes, existing licenses may be allowed to expire rather than be revoked outright. As of early September 2026, hunters had already taken 80 fin whales — the second-largest animals on Earth and classified as vulnerable to extinction — with the annual quota permitting up to 150.

The broader picture underscores how far Iceland has drifted from international consensus. Norway resumed commercial whaling in 1993 in defiance of the global moratorium; Iceland followed in 2006; Japan withdrew from the International Whaling Commission entirely in 2019. Should Iceland's bill succeed, it would mark a meaningful realignment — a nation whose economy depends on ocean health choosing to bring its laws into step with modern conservation and animal welfare standards.

Iceland's government is moving toward ending one of the world's last remaining commercial whaling operations. In February 2027, the country will submit legislation that could permanently prohibit whaling in its waters—a shift that would leave only Norway and Japan as nations still permitting the hunt.

The momentum behind the ban traces to a single, damning finding. In 2023, Iceland's own government commissioned a report on the practice and discovered that harpooned whales were taking approximately two hours to die. The report's conclusions triggered immediate pressure: that same year, the government suspended hunting temporarily. The findings have since become the centerpiece of arguments for a permanent end to the industry.

Iceland's industries minister, Hanna Katrín Friðriksson, has already signaled support for the change, describing the country's whaling laws as outdated and calling for reform. The announcement on the government's website reflects what appears to be substantial political will. Animal welfare advocates see the bill as a watershed moment. Wendy Higgins, representing Humane World for Animals, called it a "significant milestone," noting that "considerable political and public support" exists for the measure, alongside what she described as "compelling ethical, veterinary, legal and conservation reasons" for the ban to succeed.

The scale of Iceland's current whaling operation is modest but consequential. As of early September 2026, hunters had caught 80 fin whales in Icelandic waters. The hunting season runs through the end of September, and Iceland's annual quota permits up to 150 animals. Fin whales are the second-largest creatures on Earth, surpassed only by blue whales. Despite their size, they are classified as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, a status that persists even after decades of recovery following the international commercial whaling moratorium established in 1986.

Only one company still operates in Iceland's whaling industry: Hvalur, owned by Kristján Loftsson. An interim government granted the company a five-year permit that runs until 2029—a detail that complicates the timeline of any ban. Even if legislation passes, existing permits may be allowed to expire naturally rather than be revoked immediately. Higgins acknowledged this reality, saying that while campaigners want immediate cessation, "it's likely that the current whaling permits, which expire in 2029, will be allowed to run their course."

The broader context underscores how isolated Iceland's position has become. Just three countries have engaged in commercial whaling in recent years. Norway resumed the practice in 1993, defying the international moratorium. Iceland followed suit in 2006. Japan withdrew from the International Whaling Commission entirely in 2019 and resumed commercial whaling in its own waters. If Iceland's bill succeeds, that leaves two outliers—Norway and Japan—continuing a practice that most of the world has abandoned.

Sharon Livermore, director of marine conservation at the International Fund for Animal Welfare, framed the potential ban as part of a larger shift toward modern conservation standards. For a nation whose economy depends heavily on ocean health, she suggested, updating laws that permit whaling represents a step toward alignment with contemporary marine science and animal welfare standards. The bill's passage remains uncertain, but the political direction appears set.

Every whale killed by exploding harpoon in Icelandic waters is a tragic loss of life needlessly taken for an industry that has no purpose.
— Wendy Higgins, Humane World for Animals
A proposal to update the laws that allow whaling in Icelandic waters would be a groundbreaking step towards modern day marine conservation and animal welfare.
— Sharon Livermore, International Fund for Animal Welfare
Contact Us FAQ