Hundreds of doctors demand WMA suspend Israeli Medical Association

Over 1,700 Palestinian healthcare workers killed; Palestinian doctors detained and subjected to torture and medical neglect; hospitals destroyed; patients killed or displaced.
These scrubs should not be empty. Our colleagues belong with their patients, not in Israeli prisons.
A doctor protesting at the WMA summit, speaking to the eighty-one scrubs displayed bearing names of detained Palestinian healthcare workers.
Mark

Why does the WMA's membership status matter so much? It seems like a symbolic gesture.

Mimi

Membership confers legitimacy. It signals that an association meets international ethical standards. When the WMA keeps the Israeli Medical Association seated despite these allegations, it's saying those standards don't apply equally.

Luke

But we should be clear: the WMA hasn't formally ruled on the allegations. The campaign is demanding suspension; the organization hasn't suspended anyone yet. What's the actual mechanism for removal?

Mimi

That's the gap. The campaign says thirty years of dialogue has failed, but we don't know what formal procedures exist or whether the WMA has even opened a disciplinary process.

Mark

And the detained doctors—how many are we talking about? The source mentions Abu Safia specifically, but are there others?

Mimi

The scrubs displayed on Saturday bore eighty-one names. That's eighty-one Palestinian healthcare workers currently held in detention, according to the campaign.

Luke

According to the campaign. We should note that number comes from the protesters, not from an independent verification or Israeli government statement. It's credible, but it's one source.

Mark

What would suspension actually accomplish? Would it free the detained doctors?

Mimi

Probably not directly. But it would isolate the Israeli Medical Association internationally, potentially pressure the government through professional channels, and signal that the medical community takes these allegations seriously.

Luke

And the core claim—that the IMA has remained silent and defended attacks on Palestinian healthcare—is that documented? Or is it the campaign's characterization?

Mimi

The campaign makes that claim. The source doesn't provide statements from the IMA defending itself or explaining its position. That's a significant absence.

Mark

So we're hearing one side of this.

Luke

We are. The IMA's response, if they have one, isn't in this reporting.

  • Eighty-one pairs of scrubs — each named for a Palestinian medic imprisoned by Israel — were laid in silence at the WMA's doorstep, turning absence itself into testimony.
  • The scale of loss is almost incomprehensible: over 1,700 Palestinian healthcare workers killed, nearly every hospital in Gaza destroyed, and detained doctors reportedly subjected to torture and medical neglect.
  • A petition signed by 6,500 health workers from across the world was delivered to the WMA, framing suspension not as politics but as the minimum enforcement of the organization's own ethical code.
  • The son of detained Kamal Adwan Hospital director Dr. Hussam Abu Safia addressed the gathering, insisting that the Hippocratic oath cannot be conditional on whose life is deemed worth saving.
  • Campaign leaders argued that thirty years of WMA dialogue with the Israeli Medical Association has produced only impunity — and that the international medical community must now choose between enforcing its standards or rendering them meaningless.

At the gates of medicine's global conscience, hundreds of physicians gathered in Rotterdam to ask whether professional solidarity can survive moral silence. The campaign known as IMA Out! brought a petition from 6,500 health workers worldwide to the World Medical Association's summit, demanding the suspension of the Israeli Medical Association over its alleged complicity in the destruction of Palestinian healthcare — a destruction that has claimed more than 1,700 medical workers' lives since October 2023. The empty scrubs arranged outside the assembly hall, each bearing the name of a detained Palestinian colleague, posed the oldest question in medical ethics: who decides which lives are worthy of care?

Outside the World Medical Association's summit in Rotterdam on Saturday, eighty-one healthcare workers arranged scrubs in a silent row facing the assembly hall. Each garment bore the name of a Palestinian medical professional currently imprisoned by Israel — a deliberate, wordless indictment delivered to an organization the protesters accused of enabling, through three decades of inaction, the collapse of Palestinian medicine.

The campaign, IMA Out!, had gathered hundreds of doctors at the summit with a single demand: the suspension of the Israeli Medical Association. Coalition member Mejrem Ahmetaj gave voice to the display's meaning. "These scrubs should not be empty," he said. "Our colleagues belong with their patients, not in Israeli prisons."

The human cost underpinning the protest is immense. Since October 2023, more than 1,700 Palestinian healthcare workers have been killed and nearly every hospital in Gaza destroyed. The campaign's petition, signed by over 6,500 health workers worldwide, called not only for suspension but for accountability — specifically over allegations that Israeli doctors had participated in or remained silent about the starvation, torture, and medical neglect of Palestinian detainees.

Among those detained is Dr. Hussam Abu Safia, former director of Gaza's Kamal Adwan Hospital, held at the Sde Teiman facility and reportedly subjected to abuse. His son Elyas addressed a campaign meeting in Rotterdam, framing the issue in the plainest ethical terms: "Care cannot be given based on whose life is deemed worthy."

Speaking for IMA Out!, Jonathan Fluxman argued that the window for dialogue had long since closed. The campaign's position was unambiguous: the WMA must now decide whether membership in the world's foremost medical body carries any real consequence for the systematic violation of its own principles — or whether it does not.

Outside the World Medical Association's summit in Rotterdam, eighty-one healthcare workers arranged their scrubs in a line facing the assembly hall on Saturday. Each garment bore the name of a Palestinian medical professional currently imprisoned by Israel. The display was silent and deliberate—a physical indictment delivered to the doorstep of an organization that, the protesters argued, had spent three decades enabling the very system destroying Palestinian medicine.

Hundreds of doctors had gathered at the WMA summit to demand one thing: the suspension of the Israeli Medical Association from the organization. The campaign, calling itself IMA Out!, framed the demand not as a political gesture but as an enforcement of medical ethics. They argued that the Israeli Medical Association had violated nearly every principle in the WMA's own Code of Medical Ethics while remaining silent as Palestinian healthcare collapsed. Mejrem Ahmetaj, a general practitioner and coalition member, spoke to the symbolic weight of the empty scrubs. "These scrubs should not be empty," he said. "Our colleagues belong with their patients, not in Israeli prisons. Today, we literally placed their names at the WMA's doorstep."

The numbers behind the protest were staggering. Since October 2023, more than seventeen hundred Palestinian healthcare workers have been killed. Nearly every hospital and healthcare facility in Gaza has been destroyed. The campaign delivered a petition to the WMA signed by more than sixty-five hundred health workers from around the world, demanding not just suspension but accountability for what they characterized as complicity by Israeli doctors in the starvation, torture, and medical neglect of Palestinian detainees.

Among those detained is Dr. Hussam Abu Safia, who headed Gaza's Kamal Adwan Hospital before his arrest. He was held at Sde Teiman, a detention facility with a documented history of abuse, and subjected to torture and medical neglect. His case had drawn international attention and prompted doctors in Rotterdam to hold placards demanding his release. His son, Elyas Abu Safia, addressed a meeting organized by the campaign, framing the issue in terms of fundamental medical principle: "My father and all Palestinian detainees must be treated in accordance with medical ethics, and doctors must abide by the Hippocratic oath they have taken. Care cannot be given based on whose life is deemed worthy."

Jonathan Fluxman, speaking on behalf of IMA Out!, articulated the campaign's core argument: that thirty years of WMA dialogue with the Israeli Medical Association had produced nothing but impunity. "The IMA is not a bystander," Ahmetaj had stated. "It defends these attacks and blocks international condemnation while Palestinian healthcare is being destroyed. That is not medical neutrality. That is complicity." The campaign's position was that dialogue had failed, that the time for conversation had passed, and that the international medical community now faced a choice: either enforce its own ethical standards or accept that membership in the WMA carried no consequences for systematic violations of medical principle.

These scrubs should not be empty. Our colleagues belong with their patients, not in Israeli prisons.
— Mejrem Ahmetaj, general practitioner and IMA Out! coalition member
The IMA is not a bystander. It defends these attacks and blocks international condemnation while Palestinian healthcare is being destroyed. That is not medical neutrality. That is complicity.
— Mejrem Ahmetaj
Care cannot be given based on whose life is deemed worthy.
— Elyas Abu Safia, son of detained Dr. Hussam Abu Safia
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
Contáctanos FAQ