In the crowded landscape of premium wearables, Honor has produced a device that speaks fluently in the language of luxury — titanium, sapphire, five-day endurance — yet falls silent precisely where modern life demands conversation. The Watch 5 Ultra, priced around $300 and arriving amid uncertain international availability, offers a compelling physical object that struggles to justify its 'Ultra' ambitions without the software soul its competitors have cultivated. It is a reminder that in technology, as in much of human endeavor, the vessel matters far less than what it is able to carry.
Honor Watch 5 Ultra: Premium Design Undermined by Limited Software Ecosystem
A beautiful object that cannot quite deliver on what a modern smartwatch should be able to do.
Mark
Why does a watch with such solid hardware—titanium, sapphire glass, five-day battery—feel like it's missing something essential?
Mimi
Because the hardware is only half the conversation. A smartwatch in 2025 is supposed to be a gateway to your digital life, not just a display for it. Without third-party apps, you're locked into whatever Honor decided to include. That's a choice that made sense in 2015, not now.
Mark
But the health tracking is genuinely good. Doesn't that count for something?
Mimi
It does, absolutely. The Health Scan feature and sleep tracking are competitive. But if you can't reply to a WhatsApp message on your wrist, or pull up Spotify, or check Strava—things people expect from a smartwatch—the health data starts to feel like a consolation prize.
Mark
So this is really a watch for Honor phone owners only?
Mimi
Honestly, yes. If you're in that ecosystem, it's probably the best watch Honor has made. For everyone else, you're paying for beautiful hardware that can't quite do what you need it to do.
Mark
The price is aggressive though. Doesn't that change the calculation?
Mimi
It helps, but it doesn't solve the problem. You can get an Apple Watch SE for not much more, or a Wear OS watch that actually lets you install apps. The price makes the hardware feel like a steal. The software makes you wonder what you're really paying for.
Le Pouls
- A smartwatch that looks premium and costs less than its rivals creates immediate excitement — until you reach for an app that simply isn't there.
- The absence of third-party apps, functional NFC payments, and meaningful cross-device compatibility transforms a promising device into a gilded cage.
- Health tracking and battery life perform genuinely well, giving Honor a foothold of credibility even as the software gaps widen around it.
- Competitors like the OnePlus Watch 3 and Apple Watch SE offer comparable prices with far deeper ecosystems, making Honor's value proposition fragile under scrutiny.
- Trade restrictions cloud the watch's international future, leaving potential buyers in many markets unable to even access what Honor is offering.
In the crowded landscape of premium wearables, Honor has produced a device that speaks fluently in the language of luxury — titanium, sapphire, five-day endurance — yet falls silent precisely where modern life demands conversation. The Watch 5 Ultra, priced around $300 and arriving amid uncertain international availability, offers a compelling physical object that struggles to justify its 'Ultra' ambitions without the software soul its competitors have cultivated. It is a reminder that in technology, as in much of human endeavor, the vessel matters far less than what it is able to carry.
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra presents an immediate paradox: hardware that punches well above its €279 price point, wrapped around software that struggles to meet even basic modern expectations. The titanium case, sapphire glass, and octagonal silhouette suggest a device of serious intent, and the 1.5-inch AMOLED display and five-day battery life reinforce that impression. On a shelf, or on a wrist at a glance, it competes with watches costing twice as much.
The cracks appear in daily use. Of the 100 tracked sports, most offer little beyond heart rate and calorie estimates. More critically, the watch carries no third-party apps whatsoever — no Strava, no Spotify, no messaging replies, no mobile payments despite an NFC chip being present. The experience is less that of a smartwatch and more that of a sophisticated fitness band dressed for a formal occasion.
Where Honor earns genuine respect is in its health and wellness features. The Health Scan aggregates multiple biometrics to surface potential concerns, sleep tracking offers credible stage breakdowns, and swim tracking accurately distinguished between stroke styles during testing. Step counts aligned closely with a Samsung Galaxy Ring, and the battery delivered on its promises across nearly five days of active use.
Still, the 'Ultra' label feels aspirational rather than earned. The OnePlus Watch 3 at a similar price runs Wear OS with full app access. Apple and Samsung offer deeper ecosystem integration at comparable or only modestly higher price points. The Honor Watch 5 Ultra functions best — perhaps only truly well — in the hands of an Honor phone owner. For everyone else, it remains a beautiful object that quietly, persistently, reminds you of everything it cannot do. With international availability still uncertain due to trade restrictions, many potential buyers may never face that choice at all.
The Honor Watch 5 Ultra arrives as a study in contradiction: a smartwatch that looks like it costs twice as much as it does, but feels oddly incomplete the moment you start using it. On paper, the device ticks nearly every box. The titanium case is substantial and elegant. The 1.5-inch AMOLED screen is bright and responsive. The battery lasts around five days, which is genuinely impressive for a watch this capable. At €279—roughly $300 or £235—it sits comfortably below the Apple Watch SE and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, making it an obvious bargain for anyone shopping by specs alone.
But specs are not the whole story. After a week of continuous wear, testing the Honor Watch 5 Ultra on runs, in the pool, and through daily life, the device's limitations became impossible to ignore. The watch tracks 100 different sports, yet most of those modes are skeletal in what they measure. Running and swimming offer decent depth—pace per kilometer, stride length, stroke counting—but everything else defaults to heart rate and estimated calories. The octagonal shape, the grade 5 titanium bezel, the sapphire glass screen, the digital crown that makes scrolling effortless: all of this hardware excellence points toward a device that should feel like a premium companion. Instead, it feels like a very nice fitness tracker wearing a tuxedo.
The real problem is what's missing on the inside. There are no third-party apps. None. No Spotify, no Strava, no WhatsApp replies, no Gmail, no maps beyond what Honor installed at the factory. The watch has an NFC chip, but it doesn't support mobile payments. You can see incoming messages, but you cannot respond to them. You can control music playing on your phone, but only through Honor's native app. This is not a limitation that affects power users alone. It's a fundamental constraint that makes the device feel like it belongs to a different era of smartwatches, one where the watch was purely a display for your phone rather than an extension of it.
The health features do deserve credit. The new Health Scan function aggregates heart rate, blood oxygen, and stress readings alongside sleep data and your physical measurements to flag potential outliers. Sleep tracking breaks down your stages with reasonable accuracy, offering a Sleep Score and contextual insights. During the testing week, the watch estimated steps within a few hundred of a Samsung Galaxy Ring, and swim tracking correctly identified when the wearer switched from front crawl to breaststroke. The battery performed as promised, lasting through four and a half days of near-constant use. These are not small achievements.
Yet the watch's positioning as an "Ultra" device feels unearned. Garmin, Apple, and Samsung all offer watches in this price range that do far more. The OnePlus Watch 3, which costs similar money, runs Wear OS and opens the door to third-party apps. The Apple Watch SE serves iPhone users with far deeper integration. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra, though pricier, offers a richer feature set and better ecosystem compatibility. Honor has built something genuinely handsome and functionally solid, but it has done so in isolation. The watch works best—perhaps only truly well—if you own an Honor phone. For everyone else, it is a beautiful object that cannot quite deliver on what a modern smartwatch should be able to do.
International availability remains uncertain due to trade restrictions similar to those affecting Huawei. The device is compatible with Android 9.0 and iOS 13.0 and newer, but Honor has not yet confirmed where outside the EU it will be sold. When it does arrive, potential buyers will face a clear choice: accept the limitations in exchange for excellent design and value, or spend a bit more for a watch that feels less constrained. For Honor phone owners, the decision is simpler. For everyone else, the Honor Watch 5 Ultra is a watch that looks like it should be the answer, but keeps reminding you it is not.
Citations marquantes
The watch looks like a premium dress watch and feels exceptionally premium—certainly better-looking than the otherwise comparable, and more expensive, Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra.— Reviewer assessment
Without third-party apps, you're stuck with what's installed on the watch out of the box. There's no Strava, no Spotify, no WhatsApp replies.— Review findings
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur TechRadar ↗
Technology