Great apes use touch to build trust before conflict, study finds

It's like a 'we' rather than a 'me'
How apes shift from individual to collective identity through physical contact before stressful moments.
Mark

Why does it matter that apes touch before conflict? Isn't that just grooming?

Mimi

It's different. Grooming is maintenance. This is deliberate reassurance timed to a stressful moment. They know food is coming. They know tension will rise. And they choose to touch first.

Mark

But how do you know they're choosing? Maybe it's just habit.

Mimi

Because the apes who touched were measurably more likely to share food peacefully afterward. The ones who didn't touch were more likely to compete aggressively. The touch changed the outcome.

Mark

So you're saying touch is a tool for managing conflict.

Mimi

More than that. It's a way of saying: we're in this together. Before the stress arrives, they're building a shared identity. That's why researchers called it a rallying cry.

Mark

And humans do this too?

Mimi

All the time. We just don't usually think about it. A huddle before a game. A hug before bad news. A hand on the shoulder. We're using the same ancient language.

Mark

How old is this behavior?

Mimi

At least seven million years. Before we even became human. It's in our bones.

  • Chimpanzees and bonobos studied at sanctuaries in Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia
  • Apes who engaged in reassuring touch were more likely to share food peacefully
  • Behavior likely evolved at least 7 million years ago, before humans and apes diverged from common ancestor

Apes engage in touching, embracing, and even finger-in-mouth contact to build trust before competing over food, mirroring human huddles before stressful situations. Groups showing higher levels of reassuring touch, including 'reassurance trains' where multiple apes embrace in succession, were more likely to share food peacefully.

Durham University researchers found that chimpanzees and bonobos use physical contact like hugging and kissing to reassure each other before stressful events, suggesting this behavior dates back millions of years to our common ancestor.

When food arrives, tension rises. The apes know it. They can feel it coming. And so, in the minutes before the peanuts appear, something happens that researchers at Durham University found both striking and oddly familiar: the apes reach for each other.

They touch. They embrace. They press their faces close. One ape will place a finger inside another's mouth—a gesture that seems impossibly intimate for creatures with a reputation for violence. And then, when the food finally comes, something shifts. The apes who had just reassured each other moments before are more likely to eat side by side without conflict. They share space. They share resources. The trust, it seems, was real.

This is what Zanna Clay and her team at Durham observed while studying chimpanzees and bonobos at sanctuaries in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia. They designed an experiment that mimicked the natural feeding patterns these apes would encounter in the wild, using peanuts as the prize. For five minutes before the food arrived, researchers watched and recorded every instance of physical contact: the touches, the hugs, the kisses. They were looking for a pattern, and they found one.

The pattern was unmistakable. Groups that engaged in higher levels of reassuring touch—including what researchers called "reassurance trains," chains of apes embracing one another in succession—were measurably more cooperative when resources became scarce. The apes who had touched were the ones who could share. Clay described the behavior as "a rallying cry" before a stressful moment, the same impulse that sends a football team into a huddle before kickoff. "It's like a 'we' rather than a 'me'," she said. The physical contact seemed to shift something fundamental in how the apes related to one another.

What makes this finding remarkable is not just what it reveals about apes, but what it suggests about us. Jake Brooker, another researcher on the project, noted that social touch is among the oldest forms of communication known to exist—older than language, older than words. The team believes this behavior likely emerged at least seven million years ago, before humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos diverged from their common ancestor. That means every time a person hugs a friend before a difficult conversation, or pats a colleague on the shoulder before a presentation, or gathers in a huddle before something uncertain, they are drawing on a social toolkit that predates civilization itself.

The research, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, offers a window into how our closest living relatives manage the fundamental tension between competition and cooperation. Food is scarce. Resources matter. Conflict is possible. And yet, before any of that unfolds, there is this: the reaching out, the touching, the simple act of reassurance. It is a reminder that some of our deepest instincts about how to be together—how to build trust, how to prepare for stress, how to transform "me" into "we"—are not modern inventions. They are ancient. They are written into our bodies. They are waiting to be used.

Before stressful events, they come together, they reassure each other, they touch each other, they hug each other. It's like a rallying cry before a stressful event, much like a football huddle before a big match.
— Prof Zanna Clay, Durham University
Social touch was one of the oldest forms of communication and likely predated language.
— Dr Jake Brooker, Durham University
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em BBC News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ