Global study reveals millions burning plastic for heat and cooking in developing nations

Women, children, older residents, and people with disabilities face disproportionate exposure to toxic emissions from plastic burning, with widespread risks of cancer, reproductive disorders, and immune system damage.
People only do this because they have no safer alternatives
Researchers found plastic burning is driven by energy poverty and lack of waste services, not choice or ignorance.
Mark

So this study found that one in three people surveyed knew of households burning plastic. That's a lot of awareness. But how many people are actually doing it?

Mimi

The survey didn't give a precise global number of people burning plastic themselves—just that a smaller but significant group reported doing it personally. The real insight is that this is happening across 26 countries in low-income urban areas, which suggests the scale is substantial, but we don't have an exact figure.

Luke

Right, and that's important to flag. We know one in three saw it happening, but we don't know if that means 10 million people or 100 million. The study surveyed over 1,000 respondents, which is a reasonable sample, but it's not a census. We're looking at evidence of a widespread practice, not a precise headcount.

Mark

What about the health side? The dioxins and furans—how certain are we about the damage?

Mimi

The research is clear that PVC burning releases these compounds, and the science on dioxins and furans is well-established. They do persist in the environment, accumulate in food chains, and are linked to cancer and reproductive harm. The study also found evidence of toxic compounds in eggs and soil near burning sites.

Luke

But here's the thing: the study itself didn't measure dioxin levels in the communities they surveyed. They cited other studies that found toxins in eggs and soil. So we have strong evidence that the risk exists, but the Curtin study is more about documenting the practice and the potential exposure, not measuring actual contamination levels in their survey population.

Mark

So what would actually stop this? Can you just tell people not to burn plastic?

Mimi

No. The researchers were explicit about that. People burn plastic because they can't afford cleaner fuels and have no waste collection. You can't solve that with a warning. You need to address energy poverty, make clean cooking fuels affordable, and improve waste management.

Luke

Which is the hard part. Those are systemic problems. The study identifies what's happening and why, but solving it requires resources and political will that many developing countries don't have. The research is valuable for making the case that this needs attention, but it doesn't solve the underlying inequality.

Mark

And this is only going to get worse?

Mimi

Plastic use is projected to triple by 2060. Without intervention, more people will likely turn to burning it as a survival strategy.

Luke

That projection assumes current trends continue. It's a warning, not a prediction. But yes, without action on both plastic production and energy access, the problem will almost certainly grow.

  • Millions of people in low-income urban communities across 26 countries are burning plastic to cook and heat their homes — not by choice, but because no safer option exists within reach.
  • The toxic smoke from burning PVC and mixed plastics releases dioxins and furans that cause cancer, reproductive disorders, and immune damage, with women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities absorbing the greatest exposure.
  • Contamination does not stop at the air — studies near burning sites have found toxic compounds in eggs and soil, and 60% of respondents believed it highly likely that food and water supplies are already affected.
  • Global plastic production is projected to triple by 2060, meaning the population forced into this survival strategy will grow unless energy poverty and waste infrastructure failures are directly addressed.
  • Researchers are calling for systemic solutions — affordable clean fuels, functioning sanitation systems, and community-centered interventions — insisting that warnings alone cannot substitute for the alternatives people have never been given.

In the margins of the global economy, where waste collection does not reach and clean fuel remains unaffordable, millions of people have turned plastic into a source of fire — burning bags, bottles, and wrappers to cook meals and warm homes. A Curtin University study spanning 26 countries has brought this largely invisible practice into documented view, revealing that one in three surveyed respondents knew of households doing so in their communities. The smoke rising from these fires carries dioxins and furans — compounds that linger in soil, accumulate in food, and quietly erode the health of those least equipped to bear the cost. What the data makes plain is that this is not a story of ignorance, but of abandonment.

Researchers at Curtin University have documented what has long gone unexamined: millions of people in developing countries burn plastic to cook food and heat their homes. Published in Nature Communications, the study surveyed more than 1,000 people across 26 countries, speaking with community leaders, government workers, and researchers in low-income urban neighborhoods. One in three respondents reported awareness of households burning plastic nearby, and a meaningful share said they had done so themselves.

The logic is stark. Families without access to affordable clean fuels, and living where waste collection never arrives, have made plastic a dual-purpose resource — something to dispose of and something to burn. Lead researcher Dr. Bishal Bharadwaj described the study as the first to offer broad global evidence of this pattern, one that has persisted largely out of sight in communities that have drawn little international attention.

The health consequences are severe and well-established. Simple stoves — three-stone fires, makeshift burners — fill homes and dense neighborhoods with toxic smoke. Burning PVC releases dioxins and furans, among the most dangerous pollutants known, which persist in the environment, accumulate up the food chain, and cause cancer, reproductive disorders, and immune damage. PVC is the third most commonly burned plastic. Beyond the air, 60% of respondents believed toxic chemicals were extremely likely to contaminate local food and water — a concern backed by studies detecting these compounds in eggs and soil near burning sites.

Professor Peta Ashworth, director of Curtin's Institute for Energy Transition, was direct: people burn plastic because they have no safer alternative. Solving the crisis means addressing energy poverty, making clean fuels affordable, and building waste infrastructure that actually reaches marginalized communities. With global plastic use projected to triple by 2060, the scale of this hidden emergency will only grow unless governments and international bodies treat the data not as a finding to file, but as a mandate to act.

Researchers at Curtin University have documented a practice that has largely escaped global scrutiny: millions of people in developing countries are burning plastic to cook food and heat their homes. A study published in Nature Communications surveyed more than 1,000 respondents across 26 countries, focusing on low-income urban neighborhoods and speaking with researchers, government workers, and community leaders. The findings are stark. One in three people surveyed said they were aware of households burning plastic in their communities, with many having personally witnessed the practice. A smaller but still significant portion reported burning plastic themselves.

The reasons are straightforward and grim. Families without access to affordable clean fuels and living in areas with no reliable waste collection have turned plastic into a dual-purpose resource: a way to dispose of what they cannot otherwise get rid of, and a source of energy for cooking and heating. Dr. Bishal Bharadwaj, the lead researcher from Curtin's Institute for Energy Transition, noted that the study was the first to provide broad global evidence of this pattern. People are burning plastic bags, wrappers, bottles, and packaging—whatever they have—to meet basic household needs. The practice has persisted largely out of sight, hidden in marginalized communities where it has drawn little international attention despite the severe consequences.

The health risks are substantial and well-documented. Households typically use simple stoves—three-stone fires, charcoal burners, makeshift devices—to burn plastic, filling homes and densely populated areas with toxic smoke. Women, children, older residents, and people with disabilities face the greatest exposure. When polyvinyl chloride, or PVC, burns, it releases dioxins and furans, among the most dangerous pollutants known to science. These compounds do not break down easily; they persist in the environment, accumulate as they move up the food chain, and can cause cancer, reproductive disorders, and damage to the immune system. PVC ranks as the third most commonly burned plastic, making this concern particularly urgent.

The contamination extends beyond the air people breathe. Sixty percent of survey respondents believed it extremely likely that toxic chemicals from burning plastic could contaminate food and water supplies. This is not theoretical. Studies conducted near plastic burning sites have detected toxic compounds in eggs and soil samples. When plastic burns near homes and food preparation areas, the toxins settle on crops, seep into water sources, and accumulate in the foods people eat, creating what researchers describe as a hidden health crisis for communities already struggling with poverty and inadequate services.

Addressing the problem requires more than warnings or moral appeals. Professor Peta Ashworth, director of the Institute for Energy Transition, emphasized that people resort to burning plastic only because they have no safer alternatives. The root causes are energy poverty, unaffordable clean fuels, and inadequate waste management systems. Solutions must be equally comprehensive: improving sanitation infrastructure, making modern cooking energy accessible and affordable, and working directly with communities to develop practical options that fit their circumstances and cultures. The urgency is real. Plastic use globally is projected to triple by 2060, meaning that without intervention, the number of people forced to burn plastic as a survival strategy will likely grow. The research provides the evidence base needed to design interventions that actually support the world's most vulnerable urban residents—but only if governments and international organizations act on what the data reveals.

This is an issue that has largely been happening out of sight in communities and has been difficult to get accurate data on.
— Dr. Bishal Bharadwaj, lead researcher, Curtin Institute for Energy Transition
When PVC is burned, it releases highly toxic dioxins and furans, which are among the most dangerous pollutants known. PVC ranks as the third most commonly burned plastic, which is extremely concerning.
— Professor Hari Vuthaluru, Curtin's Western Australian School of Mines
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Phys.org ↗
Contáctanos FAQ