Get tested first: Cardiologist warns against vitamin D supplements without baseline check

Get tested. If you're low, supplement. If you're normal, focus on movement, sleep, stress.
Dr Osman Najam reframes vitamin D as a supporting player in health, not a cure-all requiring universal supplementation.
Mark

So the NHS is telling people to take vitamin D from October to March. Why is a cardiologist saying that's not quite right?

Mimi

He's not saying don't take it. He's saying know whether you actually need it first. A lot of people assume they're deficient, but they're guessing.

Luke

How many people in the UK are actually deficient? The article says "a lot of the people are low," but that's vague. Do we have a number?

Mimi

The source doesn't give a specific percentage. It's one of those things where the claim is real—vitamin D deficiency is documented—but the exact scale isn't pinned down here.

Mark

And if someone does get tested and finds out they're fine, what then?

Mimi

Then you don't need the supplement. You just focus on diet and a bit of sunlight. Fatty fish, egg yolks, even 15 minutes outside a few times a week.

Luke

But the NHS is recommending it to everyone, not just people who test low. Is that wrong?

Mimi

Not wrong exactly. It's a blanket precaution. But Najam's point is that blanket precautions can create unnecessary supplement use.

Mark

What about the mega-doses he mentions? Are people actually taking those?

Mimi

He says he sees it happening—people convinced that more vitamin D will prevent heart disease or cancer. But the evidence for those claims is weak.

Luke

Does the article say how weak? Any studies cited?

Mimi

No. It's his clinical observation, not a systematic review. That's worth noting.

Mark

So the practical takeaway is: get a blood test before October?

Mimi

Exactly. Then you know whether you're actually deficient. If you are, supplement. If you're not, save your money and focus on sleep, movement, stress.

Luke

And if someone can't get a test easily? The article doesn't address that barrier.

Mimi

Fair point. It assumes access that not everyone has.

  • Each October, millions reach for vitamin D supplements on NHS cue — but a cardiologist warns that starting without a blood test is guesswork dressed as prevention.
  • Mega-dose culture has taken hold, with people self-prescribing high quantities in hopes of warding off heart disease, cancer, and autoimmune conditions — claims the evidence does not reliably support.
  • The real risk is invisible: excess vitamin D accumulates in the body, and supplementing healthy levels offers no benefit while quietly bypassing the question of what is actually wrong.
  • Dietary sources — fatty fish, egg yolks, fortified foods — and even brief outdoor exposure several times a week can sustain adequate levels for many people without a single pill.
  • The path forward, Najam argues, runs through a simple blood test first, then targeted action — redirecting energy toward movement, sleep, and stress as the true foundations of health.

As autumn shortens the days and the NHS readies its annual call for vitamin D supplements, a cardiologist quietly asks a prior question: does the individual actually need them? Dr Osman Najam's counsel is not against supplementation but against assumption — the belief that more is always better, and that a calendar date is sufficient reason to begin. In a culture drawn to simple remedies, his reminder that testing precedes treating is an old medical wisdom dressed in seasonal clothes.

When the days shorten and the NHS issues its familiar autumn guidance — take vitamin D from October through March — most people reach for a bottle without a second thought. Dr Osman Najam, a consultant cardiologist, believes that reflex deserves scrutiny. His position is not that vitamin D is unimportant, but that supplementing without first knowing your actual levels is a habit masquerading as health care.

Vitamin D does genuine work: it regulates calcium and phosphate, supports bones, teeth, and muscles, and touches the cardiovascular system through blood pressure and inflammation. Deficiency is real, and in severe cases leads to rickets in children and bone-softening conditions in adults. The NHS and local health boards have consistently flagged low levels as a cause of fatigue, aches, and long-term skeletal harm — and they note that supplements are cheap, widely available, and free for those on the Healthy Start scheme.

But Najam draws a line between correcting a deficiency and chasing extra protection. If levels are already healthy, taking more does nothing useful — the excess simply accumulates. He has seen patients take mega-doses convinced that vitamin D will prevent serious disease. The evidence for those claims, he says, is far thinner than the marketing implies.

The nutrient is also available through food and modest sun exposure. Fatty fish, egg yolks, fortified milk, and mushrooms all contribute, and fifteen to twenty minutes outdoors a few times a week — even under cloud cover — can meaningfully raise levels. Those with darker skin need longer exposure, a nuance often lost in blanket public health messaging.

What Najam ultimately advocates is proportion. Test first, then decide. If deficient, supplement. If not, invest attention in movement, sleep, and stress — the factors that more reliably shift health outcomes. The winter recommendation will keep coming. He simply asks that people know their baseline before they answer it.

As the days shorten and people spend less time outdoors, the NHS recommendation arrives like clockwork: take a vitamin D supplement from October through March. The logic is sound—the UK's weak winter sun means many people fall short of the nutrient their bodies need. But a cardiologist is pushing back on the assumption that everyone should simply start popping pills when the calendar turns. Dr Osman Najam, a consultant cardiologist, argues that the first step should be a blood test, not a bottle from the pharmacy shelf.

Vitamin D does real work in the body. It regulates calcium and phosphate, which keep bones, teeth, and muscles strong. Without enough of it, children can develop rickets, and adults may suffer from osteomalacia, a condition marked by bone pain and weakness. The nutrient also touches the cardiovascular system—it influences blood pressure, inflammation, and calcium regulation, all of which matter for heart health. The evidence for vitamin D's importance is solid. What remains contested, Najam suggests, is whether most people actually need to supplement.

His argument hinges on a distinction that rarely gets stated plainly: there is a difference between correcting a deficiency and chasing extra protection. If blood work shows your vitamin D is genuinely low, supplementing makes sense. But if your levels are already healthy, taking more does nothing. The excess simply accumulates. Najam has watched people take what he calls "mega doses," convinced that vitamin D will prevent heart disease, cancer, or autoimmune conditions. The evidence for those claims, he says, is thinner than the marketing suggests. Vitamin D is a supporting player, not a cure-all.

The NHS guidance itself is more measured than the supplement industry's promises. Most guidelines suggest adults need between 1,000 and 2,000 international units daily—though individual needs vary. The nutrient is also available through food: fatty fish, egg yolks, fortified milk, mushrooms, liver, and red meat all contain it. Even modest sun exposure helps. Fifteen to twenty minutes outdoors a few times a week, even on cloudy days, can meaningfully boost levels. People with darker skin require longer sun exposure to produce the same amount, a detail often overlooked in generic health advice.

The NHS and local health boards have been consistent in their messaging, though they frame it as a precaution rather than a universal necessity. Nottingham and Nottinghamshire's integrated care board has issued annual alerts recommending that residents consider a daily supplement during the colder months. Dr Dave Briggs, speaking for the health board, noted that low vitamin D can leave people feeling tired, cause aches and pains, and in severe cases soften bones. The board also points out that supplements are cheap and widely available—many pharmacies stock them for just a few pounds, and women and children eligible for the Healthy Start scheme can get them free.

What Najam is really arguing for is a return to basics: test first, then decide. If you are low, supplement. If you are normal, invest your energy elsewhere. He points to the factors that actually move the needle on health—movement, sleep, stress management—and suggests that vitamin D, while important, occupies a smaller corner of that landscape than many people assume. The winter months will still arrive. The recommendation will still come. But before reaching for a supplement, Najam says, know your actual baseline. The test takes minutes. The answer changes everything.

If you're genuinely deficient, and I mean actually tested and not guessing, then yes, supplementing makes sense. But if you're already at a healthy level, taking more doesn't give you extra protection; it just sits there.
— Dr Osman Najam, consultant cardiologist
Vitamin D is a supporting player, not the star.
— Dr Osman Najam
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Kentlive ↗
Contáctanos FAQ