Galaxy Buds Pro vs AirPods Pro: Which noise-cancelling earbuds win?

The real choice wasn't about which was better—it was about which world you lived in.
Both earbuds excel in their own ecosystems, making the decision dependent on smartphone preference rather than objective quality.
Mark

Why does it matter so much which phone you own? Can't these earbuds just work with everything?

Mimi

They technically can—you can pair Galaxy Buds with an iPhone. But you lose the features that justify the price. It's like buying a Ferrari that only goes 40 miles per hour unless you're driving on a specific brand of road.

Mark

So Samsung and Apple are deliberately locking features behind their ecosystems?

Mimi

Not deliberately to punish you—it's more that they're optimizing for their own hardware. Samsung's Scalable Audio needs Galaxy's Bluetooth stack. Apple's auto-switching between devices requires deep integration with iOS. They're not being evil; they're just building for their own world first.

Mark

Which one actually sounds better?

Mimi

The AirPods Pro, clearly. Better soundstage, smoother mids, more powerful bass. But the Galaxy Buds Pro aren't far behind, and they're fifty dollars cheaper. If you're on Samsung, you're not sacrificing much.

Mark

What about the water resistance thing?

Mimi

That's the one place Samsung genuinely beat Apple. IPX7 versus IPX4 is a real difference if you're sweating through workouts or caught in heavy rain. It's a practical advantage, not a marketing one.

Mark

So there's no clear winner?

Mimi

Not unless you know what phone you're using. Then the answer becomes obvious.

  • Samsung entered the premium earbud arena in early 2021 with the Galaxy Buds Pro, priced $50 below Apple's AirPods Pro and boasting IPX7 water resistance that Apple's offering cannot match.
  • The tension is real: both earbuds promise active noise cancellation and spatial audio, yet each withholds its best features from users who stray outside its parent ecosystem.
  • Apple's AirPods Pro pull ahead on sound quality, noise cancellation strength, and a fully live Spatial Audio experience, while Samsung's 360 Audio equivalent remained unfinished at launch.
  • Comfort and fit create further friction — the Galaxy Buds Pro feel bulky during extended wear, while the AirPods Pro's design, though effective, divides opinion on aesthetics.
  • The resolution is not a winner but a mirror: Galaxy Buds Pro serve Samsung loyalists and fitness-focused users, AirPods Pro reward those already living inside Apple's interconnected world.

In January 2021, two of the world's most powerful technology companies placed their premium wireless earbuds side by side, and the comparison revealed something older than any gadget: the question of belonging. Samsung's Galaxy Buds Pro and Apple's AirPods Pro are not simply competing products — they are extensions of two distinct digital ecosystems, each one rewarding loyalty and penalizing departure. The choice between them is less a matter of objective quality than of which world a person has already chosen to inhabit.

When Samsung released the Galaxy Buds Pro in January 2021, the implicit question was simple: could they unseat Apple's AirPods Pro, which had dominated the premium wireless earbud market since 2019? On paper, the two products looked nearly equivalent — active noise cancellation, some form of spatial audio, and prices within fifty dollars of each other. But the deeper story was never about which earbud was objectively superior.

The Galaxy Buds Pro launched at $199, undercutting the AirPods Pro by fifty dollars and arriving with genuine strengths. Their IPX7 water resistance — capable of surviving thirty minutes submerged in fresh water — far exceeded the AirPods Pro's IPX4 rating, giving Samsung a clear edge for workout use. They also offered multipoint pairing and improved microphones. The catch was that most of these advantages only materialized when paired with a Samsung Galaxy device. On any other phone, the Buds Pro shed much of what made them compelling.

Apple's earbuds operated on the same principle, but in reverse. The AirPods Pro were engineered to feel effortless inside Apple's ecosystem — instant pairing, seamless device switching, HomePod integration, and hearing health monitoring — while offering a diminished experience to Android users. Where they genuinely excelled regardless of ecosystem was in audio performance: richer sound, stronger noise cancellation, and a fully operational Spatial Audio system supporting Dolby Atmos formats. Samsung had promised comparable 360 Audio support, but it wasn't available at launch.

Physical comfort also separated them. The Galaxy Buds Pro felt bulky and were difficult to wear lying down, while the AirPods Pro's silicone tips and vented design offered a more secure fit. Battery life was comparable and unremarkable for both. Notably, several competitors — including Sony and Cambridge Audio — offered better sound at lower prices, a reminder that neither flagship was without compromise.

In the end, the comparison resolved into a question of alignment rather than superiority. Samsung Galaxy users who prioritize durability and fitness found a compelling option at $199. Those embedded in Apple's world, seeking the best available sound and noise cancellation, found the AirPods Pro worth their $249. Each earbud was built for a different world — and choosing between them meant recognizing which world you already called home.

Samsung's new Galaxy Buds Pro arrived in January 2021 with a straightforward challenge: could they match Apple's AirPods Pro, the earbuds that had dominated the premium wireless market since 2019? On paper, the two looked nearly identical—both offered active noise cancellation, spatial audio of some kind, and price tags in the same ballpark. But the real story wasn't about which one was objectively better. It was about which one belonged in your ears, and that answer depended almost entirely on what phone lived in your pocket.

The Galaxy Buds Pro launched at $199, undercutting the AirPods Pro by fifty dollars. That price difference mattered, especially since Samsung had moved fast—releasing the Buds Pro just six months after the Galaxy Buds Live, while Apple had taken years between AirPods generations. The Samsung earbuds brought genuine improvements over their predecessors: better sound, sharper microphones, and the ability to pair with multiple devices at once. They also boasted IPX7 water resistance, meaning they could survive thirty minutes submerged in fresh water up to a meter deep. The AirPods Pro, by contrast, topped out at IPX4—adequate for rain and sweat, but not for serious water exposure. For anyone planning to wear earbuds during intense workouts, Samsung had a clear advantage.

But the moment you moved beyond those specs, the ecosystem walls went up. The Galaxy Buds Pro were built for Samsung phones. They unlocked their best features—multipoint pairing, hands-free Bixby voice control, Samsung's proprietary Scalable Audio for high-resolution streaming, SmartThings tracking, even the ability to use them as a lapel microphone while shooting video—only when paired with Galaxy devices. On an iPhone or non-Samsung Android phone, you lost most of what made them special. The AirPods Pro worked the opposite way. They were engineered for Apple's world. They paired instantly with iPhones and iPads, switched seamlessly between Apple devices with a single tap, integrated with HomePod speakers, and offered hearing health tracking that monitored your listening volume. Android users could pair them, but they'd miss the magic.

When it came to what you actually heard, the AirPods Pro pulled ahead. They delivered richer sound quality with a well-balanced soundstage, smooth midrange, and powerful bass—particularly good for pop, rock, and R&B, though less suited to classical music. Their noise cancellation was noticeably stronger than Samsung's. The Galaxy Buds Pro's ANC could handle steady background noise like air purifiers and humidifiers, but they struggled when someone played music in the next room. Samsung promised to add 360 Audio support later in the year, which would bring "theater-like, multichannel sound" to match Apple's Spatial Audio, but that feature wasn't ready at launch. The AirPods Pro's Spatial Audio was already live, working in 5.1, 7.1, and Dolby Atmos formats—meaning you could watch a film and hear a plane actually sound like it was flying overhead.

There were other friction points. The Galaxy Buds Pro felt bulky in the ear and uncomfortable to wear lying down. The AirPods Pro, with their silicone tips and built-in air vents, fit more securely and comfortably, though some people found their protruding stems aesthetically awkward. Neither set excelled at battery life—the Galaxy Buds Pro offered up to 27 hours total, the AirPods Pro 25 hours—respectable but not class-leading. And both were expensive. The Sony WF-1000XM3 and Cambridge Audio Melomania 1 offered better sound for less money, while budget options like the Lypertek PurePlay Z3 delivered surprising quality at a fraction of the price.

The real choice, then, wasn't about finding the objectively superior earbud. It was about alignment. If you owned a Samsung Galaxy S21 or other Galaxy phone and valued water resistance and workout durability, the Galaxy Buds Pro made sense at $199. If you lived in Apple's ecosystem and wanted the best sound quality and noise cancellation available right now, the AirPods Pro justified their $249 price tag. Neither was wrong. Both were simply built for different worlds, and choosing between them meant choosing which world you already lived in.

The Galaxy Buds Pro are specifically designed to work with Galaxy devices, meaning iOS or non-Galaxy Android users won't access many features that set these earbuds apart.
— TechRadar review findings
The AirPods Pro integrate seamlessly into Apple's ecosystem, with features like auto-switching between devices and Intercom support via HomePod speakers.
— TechRadar review findings
Contact Us FAQ