Across nearly five decades, three aging Iranian men have carried the weight of what they say was done to them in the Shah's prisons — and a Florida federal court has now ruled that weight deserves a hearing. Judge Gregory Presnell declined to dismiss a civil lawsuit against Parviz Sabeti, alleged former chief of Iran's feared Savak secret police, allowing claims under the Torture Victim Protection Act to proceed to discovery. The case raises a question that haunts the long aftermath of authoritarian regimes: how long can impunity shelter itself behind the passage of time, and what does justice
Florida court clears path for torture lawsuit against alleged Iranian secret police chief
Three Iranian men, now aged 68-85, claim they were among thousands abducted, tortured, and imprisoned by Savak under Sabeti's direction, subjected to rape, electric shocks, near-drowning, and forced confessions.
Perpetrators of torture should not escape accountability simply because survivors were forced to live with fear
Mark
So a judge just said this lawsuit can go forward. What exactly did the judge decide?
Mimi
He rejected Sabeti's argument that too much time has passed. Sabeti claimed he'd lived openly in Florida for decades, so the plaintiffs should have found him and sued him long ago. The judge said no—the circumstances here are extraordinary enough to let the case proceed.
Luke
But wait—did the judge actually rule on whether the statute of limitations should be extended, or did he just say discovery should happen first?
Mimi
He ordered discovery on the question. So the parties will present evidence, and then he'll decide whether the deadline should be extended.
Mark
And the plaintiffs say they only found him because of a photo his daughter posted in 2023?
Mimi
Right. They claim he'd been living under the radar, concealing his identity, despite what his lawyers say about property records and photos with George H.W. Bush.
Luke
That's the tension though—his lawyers have documents showing he lived openly. So is he actually hiding, or is the lawsuit just hard to bring against someone who's been in the country legally?
Mimi
That's what discovery will test. The judge is saying there's enough here to let a jury hear it.
Mark
What are the actual allegations? What did Sabeti supposedly do?
Mimi
He's accused of being the head of Savak, the Shah's secret police. The three plaintiffs claim they were tortured under his direction—rape, electric shocks, near-drowning, forced confessions. They say they were among thousands.
Luke
And Sabeti denies all of it. He says he opposed torture and that his work was clerical.
Mimi
Yes. He's never admitted to any involvement in detention or torture.
Mark
So this goes to trial next year?
Mimi
Possibly. The ruling allows it to move forward, but there's still discovery and potentially motions before trial.
Luke
And it's worth noting—this is a civil case under the Torture Victim Protection Act, not a criminal prosecution. The burden of proof is lower, and the remedy is damages, not prison.
The Pulse
- Three men, now between 68 and 85 years old, allege they were abducted, beaten into false confessions, and subjected to rape, electric shocks, near-drowning, and the extraction of fingernails under a system they say Sabeti commanded.
- Sabeti has lived quietly in an upscale Florida community for decades, his presence unknown to his accusers until his daughter posted a photograph of him at a 2023 protest — a single image that cracked open a half-century of distance.
- His legal team argued he had never hidden, producing property records, press clippings, and a photograph of Sabeti alongside former President George H.W. Bush and Jeb Bush — yet the judge found the circumstances sufficient to let the case move forward.
- The ruling clears the path to discovery, where courts will weigh whether the statute of limitations should be extended given the plaintiffs' inability to locate him — with trial potentially as early as next year.
- The case lands inside a fractured Iranian diaspora already shaken by US military action against Tehran, internal disputes over Reza Pahlavi's political ambitions, and the unsolved killing of an activist in Canada who had criticized both.
Across nearly five decades, three aging Iranian men have carried the weight of what they say was done to them in the Shah's prisons — and a Florida federal court has now ruled that weight deserves a hearing. Judge Gregory Presnell declined to dismiss a civil lawsuit against Parviz Sabeti, alleged former chief of Iran's feared Savak secret police, allowing claims under the Torture Victim Protection Act to proceed to discovery. The case raises a question that haunts the long aftermath of authoritarian regimes: how long can impunity shelter itself behind the passage of time, and what does justice owe those who survived to tell the story?
A federal judge in Florida has allowed a civil lawsuit to proceed against Parviz Sabeti, accused of leading Savak, the Shah of Iran's secret police, during one of the most repressive periods of the regime's history. Judge Gregory Presnell rejected Sabeti's argument that the case was too old to survive, clearing the way for discovery in a lawsuit brought by three Iranian men now in their late sixties and eighties.
The plaintiffs claim they were among thousands of political prisoners abducted, tortured, and broken under Sabeti's authority before the 1979 Islamic Revolution ended the Shah's reign. Their allegations include rape, electric shocks, near-drowning, forced confessions, and the use of a device called Apollo — an electric chair fitted with a metal helmet designed to amplify victims' screams back into their own ears.
Sabeti has lived for decades in an upscale central Florida community, his presence there unknown until his daughter shared a photograph of him at a 2023 anti-government protest on social media. His attorneys argued he had never concealed himself, pointing to property records and even a photograph of him with George H.W. Bush and Jeb Bush. The judge's ruling suggests the plaintiffs' inability to locate him earlier is enough to allow the case to continue regardless.
Sabeti has denied all wrongdoing, describing his government role as clerical and stating he always opposed torture. The Center for Justice and Accountability, representing the plaintiffs, called the ruling a milestone, arguing that survivors of state torture should not lose their day in court simply because fear kept them silent for decades.
The lawsuit arrives amid turbulence in the Iranian diaspora. US military action against Iran has energized opposition movements, while disputes over Reza Pahlavi's political future have exposed deep fractures — including a killing in Canada earlier this year of an activist who had criticized both the military campaign and efforts to restore the Pahlavi line. The Sabeti case now moves toward what could become one of the first major US court proceedings against an alleged architect of torture under the Shah.
A federal judge in Florida has cleared the way for a civil lawsuit to proceed against Parviz Sabeti, a man accused of being the former head of Savak, the Shah of Iran's secret police and intelligence agency. The decision, issued this week by Judge Gregory A Presnell, rejected Sabeti's argument that too much time has passed since the alleged crimes occurred and that the case should be dismissed before trial. Three Iranian men, now in their late sixties and eighties, brought the lawsuit under the Torture Victim Protection Act, claiming they were among thousands of political prisoners detained, interrogated, and tortured under Sabeti's direction during the Shah's reign, which ended with the Islamic revolution in 1979.
Sabeti has lived quietly in an upscale central Florida community for decades, a fact that became public only after his daughter posted a photograph of him at a 2023 protest against the Iranian government on social media. The plaintiffs say they could not have found him or sued him earlier without that disclosure. Sabeti's legal team countered that he had never hidden—they filed property records, media articles, and even a photograph showing Sabeti with former President George H.W. Bush and his son Jeb Bush, a former Florida governor, to prove he had lived openly under his real name. The judge's ruling suggests that despite this visibility, the circumstances of the case warrant allowing the lawsuit to move forward to the discovery phase, where both sides will present evidence.
The allegations against Sabeti are severe. According to the complaint, he was identified by the CIA in a 1978 secret analysis as a fiercely loyal ally of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and as one of the most powerful and feared figures in the Shah's regime, with authority to apprehend, interrogate, and prosecute opponents throughout the country. The three plaintiffs claim they were abducted in Tehran, beaten into false confessions, and subjected to systematic abuse including rape, electric shocks, near-drowning, and forced extraction of fingernails. The lawsuit details the use of a torture device called Apollo—an electric chair with a metal helmet designed to amplify victims' screams back into their own ears.
Sabeti has consistently denied these allegations. He has stated that he was never involved in detention, torture, or execution of prisoners, and that he "always opposed torture." In a 2023 interview with the Persian-language channel Manoto, cited by a dissident Iranian organization, Sabeti characterized his government work as clerical in nature. His legal team includes seven attorneys, none of whom responded to requests for comment.
Claret Vargas, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Justice and Accountability, which represents the three plaintiffs, called the judge's decision an important milestone. "Perpetrators of torture should not escape accountability simply because the survivors were forced to live with fear for decades," she said. The ruling allows the case to proceed on the federal civil claims; the judge had previously dismissed state law claims in an earlier motion.
The case arrives amid broader turbulence within the Iranian diaspora in the United States. Donald Trump's military actions against Iran have intensified scrutiny of the country's hardline Islamic regime and energized opposition movements among Iranian expatriates. Reza Pahlavi, the former Shah's son, has positioned himself as a potential leader should the current regime fall, though his level of popular support remains uncertain. In June, Pahlavi was forced to distance himself from far-right supporters who displayed Savak emblems at rallies. The tensions within the opposition are stark: earlier this year, Iranian activist Masood Masjoody, who had criticized both the US-led military campaign and efforts to install Pahlavi as a future leader, was killed in Canada. His disappearance in February was followed by a threatening post in Farsi on X from an account named for Savak, since deleted.
The Sabeti lawsuit now moves toward discovery, where the court will examine whether the statute of limitations should be extended given the alleged concealment of his whereabouts and identity. The case is expected to proceed toward trial as early as next year, potentially marking one of the first major accountability proceedings in a US court against an alleged architect of torture under the Shah's regime.
Notable Quotes
Perpetrators of torture should not escape accountability simply because the survivors were forced to live with fear for decades.— Claret Vargas, Center for Justice and Accountability
I always opposed torture.— Parviz Sabeti (via 2023 interview)
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Crime & Justice