On a Sunday afternoon in Powell, Ohio, what began as a simple gathering near the Scioto River became a study in the terrible arithmetic of panic and instinct — one person struggling in the water, then another entering to help, then another, until five were gone. The impulse to save a life is among the most human of reflexes, yet water does not negotiate with intention. Two children survived to carry the memory forward, and a nation found itself, for the second time in three days, asking what we owe each other in moments of crisis — and what those moments cost.
Five drown in Ohio river after rescue attempts go tragically wrong
Five people drowned; two children under age 10 survived and were placed in family services care.
And that's when the tragedy started to occur
Mark
What made this particular rescue attempt go so wrong? Was it the depth of the water, the current?
Mimi
The sheriff didn't specify those details at the news conference. What we know is that one person struggled, others entered to help, and then those helpers also began struggling. It suggests the water conditions overwhelmed multiple people in sequence—maybe a current, maybe panic spreading, maybe the water was deeper or colder than anyone expected.
Mark
The child who ran—how old was that child, and did they understand what was happening?
Mimi
The sheriff only said the child was under ten. Young enough to be frightened, old enough to recognize danger and run toward the road. That instinct to seek help probably saved their life and their sibling's life. A motorist saw them and called 911. Without that, the discovery might have taken much longer.
Mark
Why does the story mention the Utah flood?
Mimi
Because it happened two days before. Five people dead in Utah, five people dead in Ohio, both water-related, both within a short window. It's not a coincidence the news connected them—it's a pattern that makes people ask whether we're paying attention to water safety, whether we understand how quickly things can go wrong.
Mark
Did the sheriff say anything about whether this was preventable?
Mimi
Not in the way you might expect. He described what happened factually, but there was no statement about negligence or recklessness. Sometimes people simply enter water and things go wrong. The tragedy is that those who tried to help became victims themselves.
The Pulse
- A single swimmer in distress set off a chain reaction that no one in the group could stop — each rescuer becoming the next victim in a matter of moments.
- Two children under ten were left on the riverbank as the adults around them disappeared into the current, one child ultimately running to a nearby road in desperation.
- A passing motorist spotted the child alone and distressed, and that 911 call became the only thread connecting the tragedy to the outside world.
- Divers recovered two women Sunday and three men Monday — all five pronounced dead — while the two surviving children were placed in family services care.
- The incident lands just seventy-two hours after five members of a Utah family died in a flash flood, forcing a broader reckoning with water safety and the fatal gap between the instinct to help and the ability to do so.
On a Sunday afternoon in Powell, Ohio, what began as a simple gathering near the Scioto River became a study in the terrible arithmetic of panic and instinct — one person struggling in the water, then another entering to help, then another, until five were gone. The impulse to save a life is among the most human of reflexes, yet water does not negotiate with intention. Two children survived to carry the memory forward, and a nation found itself, for the second time in three days, asking what we owe each other in moments of crisis — and what those moments cost.
On a Sunday afternoon along the Scioto River in Powell, Ohio, a group gathered near the water. One person waded in to swim. Within moments, someone was struggling — and others moved to help. By the time rescue crews arrived, five people were dead.
Delaware County Sheriff Jeffrey Balzer described the sequence at a Monday news conference with the careful precision of someone recounting something that still didn't quite make sense. One swimmer got into trouble. Others jumped in to assist. "And that's when the tragedy started to occur," he said. The water that had seemed manageable became something else entirely, pulling in those who had come to save.
Two young children had been with the group. One, understanding that something was catastrophically wrong, ran from the riverbank toward the road. A motorist spotted the child alone and distressed and called 911 — the first alert authorities had that anything had gone wrong. Divers recovered two women that Sunday; both were pronounced dead at a hospital. Three men were found in the river the following day, all deceased. The two surviving children, both under ten, were placed in the care of family services.
The tragedy arrived just two days after five members of a single family were killed when a flash flood swept through canyons in southern Utah. Two incidents, two different bodies of water, the same outcome repeated within seventy-two hours — leaving behind questions about how quickly water turns dangerous, and about the instinct to help that can itself become fatal.
On a Sunday afternoon along the Scioto River in Powell, Ohio, a suburb just north of Columbus, a group gathered near the water. One person waded in to swim. Within moments, the situation unraveled in the way these things sometimes do—quickly, without warning, past the point where anyone could reverse course. Others in the group saw someone struggling and moved to help. By the time it was over, five people were dead.
Delaware County Sheriff Jeffrey Balzer described the sequence at a news conference Monday with the careful precision of someone recounting something that still didn't quite make sense. One person had gone into the river. Then others jumped in to assist. "And that's when the tragedy started to occur," Balzer said. The water that had seemed manageable became something else entirely. Those who entered to rescue found themselves in the same predicament as the person they'd come to save.
Two young children had been with the group that day. One of them, frightened and understanding something was catastrophically wrong, ran from the riverbank toward the nearby road. A motorist spotted the child running, distressed and alone, and called 911. That call was the first alert authorities had that something had gone wrong at the river. By then, rescue crews were already mobilizing.
When divers and rescue personnel reached the water on Sunday, they recovered two women. Both were taken to a hospital, where they were pronounced dead. The search continued into Monday. Three men were found in the river the following day, according to Tracy Whited, a spokesperson for the Delaware County Sheriff's Department. All three were deceased.
Two children under the age of ten survived the afternoon. The child who had run for help, and another young child from the group, were placed in the care of family services. They would carry forward the memory of what happened while the five adults did not.
The tragedy arrived at a moment when water safety seemed to be on few people's minds. Two days earlier, in southern Utah, five members of a single family had been killed when a flash flood swept through canyons during a hiking trip. Two separate incidents, two different bodies of water, the same outcome repeated within seventy-two hours. The Scioto River incident raised questions that would linger: about how quickly water can turn dangerous, about the instinct to help that can itself become fatal, about the gap between intention and outcome when people find themselves in circumstances they cannot control.
Notable Quotes
One person went into the river to swim, and when others jumped in to help, they also began struggling— Delaware County Sheriff Jeffrey Balzer
Want the full story?
Read the original at CBS News ↗
Weather & Disasters