At the intersection of sport, money, and power, Fifa finds itself pressing forward with a plan to invite private capital into the governance of football's most sacred competition — even as the confederations that represent Europe and the Americas have threatened to abandon the World Cup altogether. The proposal, championed by president Gianni Infantino, would create a commercial subsidiary through which outside investors could acquire minority stakes in Fifa's major tournaments, including the World Cup itself. What unfolds now is a deeper question about who football ultimately belongs to: the
Fifa defends privatization plan as Uefa threatens World Cup boycott
Nobody is selling football, Fifa insists—but the math says otherwise.
Mark
Why would Fifa want to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors? What's the actual problem they're trying to solve?
Mimi
The stated reason is that member associations should benefit from the commercial value their football generates. Right now, Fifa controls that value centrally. Infantino's argument is that by creating this subsidiary and letting investors in, the member associations themselves get a piece of ownership. It's framed as democratization, though it's also clearly a way to unlock capital.
Mark
But if Uefa is threatening to boycott the World Cup, doesn't that make the whole thing worthless? What's a World Cup without Europe?
Mimi
Exactly. That's why the threat is so potent. A World Cup without European teams would be a hollow tournament. Infantino knows this, which is why the September 19 deadline and the $40 million carrot matter so much. He's trying to move fast, before the opposition hardens into something immovable.
Mark
Who actually benefits from this deal? The member associations, or the investors?
Mimi
Both, theoretically. But the power dynamic is clear. Thrive Eternal and its investors get a stake in the most valuable sports property on earth. The member associations get money upfront, but they're also ceding control of how their sport's commercial future unfolds. And Infantino gets to reshape Fifa's structure in his image.
Mark
Is there a legitimate governance concern here, or is this just about money?
Mimi
It's both. The governance concern is real—once you let private investors into the room, their interests become part of the decision-making process. They'll want returns. That changes what the World Cup is for. But yes, it's also about money. Fifa and its leadership want to unlock capital that's currently locked inside the organization.
Mark
What happens if Uefa actually follows through on the boycott threat?
Mimi
Then Infantino loses. The World Cup becomes a second-tier tournament overnight. But that's also why he's moving so aggressively—he's betting that the threat is negotiating theater, that eventually the money and the pressure will be enough to bring the Europeans to the table.
El Pulso
- Uefa and Concacaf have both formally threatened to boycott future World Cups if Fifa proceeds — a seismic escalation that would hollow out the very tournament Infantino is trying to monetize.
- The proposed lead investor, Thrive Eternal, is founded by Joshua Kushner, lending the dispute an unavoidable political dimension that extends well beyond boardrooms and balance sheets.
- Fifa is dangling $40 million to member associations willing to back the plan before a September 19 deadline, raising questions about whether consent is being purchased rather than earned.
- The arithmetic is unforgiving: Uefa and Concacaf together hold 96 votes, just ten short of the 106 needed to block the proposal outright, making the outcome genuinely uncertain.
- Fifa insists no one is 'selling football,' but its opponents argue the plan subordinates the sport's governance integrity to the interests of private capital and personal enrichment.
- The September 19 deadline now functions as a pressure valve — either the opposition fractures under financial incentive, or Infantino faces the most consequential defeat of his presidency.
At the intersection of sport, money, and power, Fifa finds itself pressing forward with a plan to invite private capital into the governance of football's most sacred competition — even as the confederations that represent Europe and the Americas have threatened to abandon the World Cup altogether. The proposal, championed by president Gianni Infantino, would create a commercial subsidiary through which outside investors could acquire minority stakes in Fifa's major tournaments, including the World Cup itself. What unfolds now is a deeper question about who football ultimately belongs to: the institutions that built it, the investors who would fund its future, or the member associations caught between loyalty and incentive.
Fifa is pressing ahead with a plan to sell minority stakes in its competitions to private investors, even as two of its most powerful confederations have threatened to boycott the World Cup in response. On the same day, Uefa voted to walk away from future tournaments if the scheme proceeds, and Concacaf's 41 member associations formally rejected it — a coordinated act of defiance that has thrown Fifa's ambitions into serious doubt.
The plan, driven by president Gianni Infantino, centers on a new commercial subsidiary called Fifa Forward Enterprise. External investors would acquire minority stakes in this entity, which would hold rights to Fifa's major competitions including the World Cup. Fifa has insisted this is not a selloff, framing it instead as a chance for member associations to share in the commercial value their sport generates. But critics, including Uefa, have accused Fifa of using football to enrich insiders — a charge sharpened by the identity of the proposed lead investor: Thrive Eternal, an American venture capital firm founded by Joshua Kushner, brother of Donald Trump's adviser Jared Kushner.
The numbers tell a difficult story for Infantino. Fifa needs 106 of 211 member votes to pass the proposal. Uefa and Concacaf together control 96 — enough to block it. To soften the opposition, Fifa is offering $40 million to federations that back the plan, with $20 million available immediately to those who commit before a September 19 deadline.
Fifa's public response has framed the backlash as a media problem rather than a governance crisis, pledging continued 'open and democratic' dialogue. But Uefa's threat is not easily dismissed — a European boycott would devastate both the credibility and the commercial value of the very tournament Infantino is trying to unlock. Whether the confederations are drawing a genuine line or negotiating from strength, the September deadline now stands as a moment that will define the future shape of football's governance.
Fifa is doubling down on a plan to sell pieces of itself to private investors, even as the sport's most powerful regional bodies have threatened to walk away from the World Cup entirely. On Thursday, Uefa—which governs European football—voted to boycott future World Cups if Fifa proceeds with the scheme. Concacaf, the confederation overseeing North and Central American football, followed suit the same day, with its 41 member associations formally rejecting the proposal.
The plan comes from Fifa president Gianni Infantino and hinges on creating a commercial subsidiary called Fifa Forward Enterprise, or FFE. The idea is straightforward in its ambition: external investors would buy minority stakes in this new entity, which would control Fifa's major competitions, including the World Cup itself. Fifa insists this is not a fire sale. In a statement released Friday, the organization declared that "nobody is selling football" and reframed the move as an opportunity for member associations to own a piece of the commercial value their sport generates.
But the math of the situation is stark. Fifa needs 106 votes from its 211 member associations to approve the plan. Uefa and Concacaf together control 96 votes—enough to block it. That arithmetic explains why Uefa's boycott threat carries such weight. The European confederation has accused Fifa of using football "to enrich themselves and their friends," a barb that cuts at both the governance question and the identity of the proposed lead investor.
That investor is Thrive Eternal, an American venture capital firm founded by Joshua Kushner, brother of Jared Kushner, who is married to Ivanka Trump and serves as an adviser to President Donald Trump. The connection adds a layer of political texture to what is ostensibly a financial matter. Infantino has sweetened the deal for member associations by offering them $40 million if they back the proposal, with an initial $20 million available immediately—but only if they commit by September 19.
Fifa's Friday statement attempted to reframe the conversation, claiming that media reports had "disrupted" the consultation process and that the organization remains committed to "open and democratic" dialogue. The language suggests Fifa views the opposition as a communications problem rather than a fundamental disagreement about how football should be governed and monetized. The organization argues that FFE would ensure member associations have "meaningful ownership of the commercial opportunity of football in their respective countries" without compromising Fifa's spirit or governance structure.
Yet the threat from Uefa is real. The European confederation represents some of the world's wealthiest and most influential football nations. A World Cup boycott by European teams would be catastrophic for the tournament's credibility and commercial value—the very thing Infantino is trying to unlock. Whether that threat is a negotiating tactic or a genuine line in the sand remains unclear, but it has fundamentally altered the landscape Infantino must navigate. The September 19 deadline looms as a moment of reckoning, one that will determine whether football's governance structure bends toward private capital or holds its ground.
Citas Notables
Nobody is selling football. This is not something Fifa would ever entertain.— Fifa statement
Uefa accused Fifa of using football to enrich themselves and their friends.— Uefa
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Sports