FDA to weigh testosterone therapy for menopausal women amid safety questions

We do not have evidence that it improves muscle, bone, mood, or well-being
A Mayo Clinic expert pushes back against social media claims about testosterone's broader benefits for menopausal women.
Mark

So the FDA is actually considering approving testosterone for women now? I thought that ship had sailed years ago.

Mimi

It's been rejected four times before, yes. But the landscape has shifted—other countries have approved it, and hundreds of women submitted comments describing real benefits. The agency is taking another look.

Luke

But we should be clear: those women are describing benefits for sexual desire specifically. The broader claims about muscle, bone, mood—those don't have the evidence behind them yet.

Mark

So when women say testosterone changed their lives, what exactly are they reporting?

Mimi

Primarily restored libido and sexual function, along with increased energy. Those are the benefits with actual research support. The social media claims about cognition and bone density are running ahead of the science.

Luke

And the safety picture—how solid is it really?

Mimi

For men with low testosterone, it's well-established as safe when monitored. For women, the data is thinner, especially long-term. Breast cancer risk is a real concern for some women.

Mark

Why hasn't the FDA approved a female-specific product before now?

Mimi

Insufficient long-term safety data, and unresolved questions about cardiovascular and cancer risk. Those are legitimate gaps, not bureaucratic foot-dragging.

Luke

Though it's worth noting that last year the FDA actually removed a cardiovascular warning from male testosterone products. So the risk picture may be shifting.

Mark

What would approval actually change for women right now?

Mimi

Standardized dosing, clear labeling, insurance coverage. Right now doctors are splitting male pills or ordering compounded versions. It's a mess.

Luke

And we won't have better data until studies like Stanford's MIX-T finish—that's still two years out.

  • Hundreds of women have submitted public testimony describing testosterone as transformative — restoring desire, energy, and a sense of self that menopause had quietly eroded.
  • No FDA-approved testosterone product for women exists, forcing physicians into an awkward workaround of splitting male-dosed formulations or ordering custom compounds with no standardized labeling or insurance coverage.
  • Experts warn that social media enthusiasm has outrun the science: the evidence supports testosterone only for low sexual desire, while claims about muscle, bone, cognition, and mood remain unsupported by clinical research.
  • Unresolved safety questions — including cardiovascular risk and potential to fuel breast cancer recurrence — have caused the FDA to reject female testosterone approval four times already.
  • Australia, the UK, and several other nations have already licensed female-specific testosterone products, leaving American women in a regulatory gap their counterparts elsewhere no longer face.
  • A Stanford pilot study and the FDA's own evolving posture on cardiovascular warnings suggest the landscape is shifting — but a definitive answer on safety and approval remains at least years away.

For decades, American women experiencing the hormonal shifts of menopause have sought testosterone through a patchwork of off-label prescriptions and compounded formulations, navigating a system that was never designed with them in mind. This week, the FDA convenes a public hearing to weigh that lived experience against the incomplete science surrounding testosterone's long-term safety — a reckoning that four prior reviews could not resolve. The question before the agency is not simply whether a drug works, but what standard of evidence a society owes to those who have been waiting, and what risks it is willing to name before it acts.

The FDA is holding a public hearing this week on whether testosterone should be approved as a treatment for menopausal women — a question that has never been resolved in the United States despite decades of off-label use. No female-specific testosterone product has ever received FDA approval. When doctors do prescribe it, they typically split doses from male formulations like AndroGel or order custom-compounded versions from specialty pharmacies, a workaround that leaves women without standardized dosing, clear labeling, or insurance coverage.

The hearing marks a potential inflection point. The FDA has reviewed testosterone for female use four times before and declined each time, citing insufficient long-term safety data and unresolved concerns about cardiovascular and breast cancer risk. But the context has changed: the agency recently removed a boxed cardiovascular warning from male testosterone products, and countries including Australia, the United Kingdom, South Africa, and New Zealand have already approved female-specific formulations. The public comment period drew a flood of submissions from women describing meaningful improvements in sexual function and overall well-being.

Medical experts urge caution about how broadly those benefits should be interpreted. Dr. Stephanie Faubion of the Mayo Clinic notes that the scientific evidence supports testosterone only for hypoactive sexual desire disorder — low libido — and not for the wider claims circulating on social media about muscle mass, bone density, mood, or cognition. Dr. Karen Adams of Stanford echoes that the long-term safety picture remains murky, particularly for women with a history of breast cancer, since testosterone can convert to estrogen in the body.

Stanford is currently running a pilot study examining how low-dose testosterone affects vaginal health in postmenopausal women, with results expected within two years. Meanwhile, Dr. Diana Tordoff points out that an approved female product could bring standardized dosing and safety protocols — and potentially open insurance coverage that off-label prescribing cannot. The FDA's decision will ultimately determine not just whether American women gain access to a regulated treatment, but what evidentiary standard the medical system requires before declaring a therapy both safe and effective.

The FDA is convening a public hearing this week to examine whether testosterone should become an approved treatment for menopausal women—a question that has drawn hundreds of written submissions from patients describing restored desire, sharper energy, and a sense of reclaimed vitality. No female-specific testosterone product has ever received FDA approval in the United States, despite decades of doctors prescribing testosterone off-label to women experiencing low sexual desire, a condition clinicians call hypoactive sexual desire disorder, or HSDD. When physicians do prescribe testosterone to female patients, they typically reach for products designed and dosed for men—splitting pills from formulations like Testim or AndroGel, or ordering custom-compounded versions from specialty pharmacies. The practical awkwardness of this workaround points to a larger gap: the absence of standardized dosing, clear labeling, or insurance coverage pathways tailored to women.

The hearing represents a potential turning point in how American medicine approaches testosterone and menopause. Four times in the past, the FDA has reviewed testosterone for female use and declined to approve it, citing insufficient long-term safety data and unresolved questions about cardiovascular and breast cancer risk. Yet the landscape has shifted. Last year, the agency removed a boxed warning about elevated cardiovascular risk from male testosterone products after reviewing post-marketing studies, though warnings about blood pressure elevation remain. Meanwhile, other countries have moved ahead: Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom have all licensed or approved testosterone products specifically for women. The FDA's call for public comment drew a flood of responses, many from women testifying to tangible improvements in sexual function and overall well-being while taking testosterone.

But medical experts caution that the evidence supporting testosterone's benefits is far narrower than popular enthusiasm suggests. Dr. Stephanie Faubion, who directs the Mayo Clinic's Center for Women's Health, emphasizes that the scientific case is strongest only for HSDD—low sexual desire—and weak or absent for the broader claims circulating on social media: that testosterone sharpens cognition, strengthens bones, builds muscle, or lifts mood. "We do not have any evidence in women that it will improve muscle mass or bone density or mood or well-being or really any other metric," Faubion said. Social media has amplified these broader claims, but the research simply does not support them. Dr. Karen Adams, who directs Stanford Medicine's menopause program, notes that testosterone has been evaluated repeatedly by the FDA and rejected each time because the long-term safety picture remains murky.

The safety questions are not trivial. Testosterone can convert to estrogen in the body, raising concern for women with a history of breast cancer, where the hormone might fuel recurrence. Physicians also report that excessive testosterone exposure can cause acne and unwanted hair growth, and in less common cases, voice deepening and permanent hair loss. For women without these contraindications, testosterone is generally considered safe when prescribed and monitored by a clinician—the evidence base for this is solid in men with clinically low hormone levels, and preliminary data suggest similar safety profiles in women. Yet the long-term picture remains incomplete. Dr. Diana Tordoff, an instructor in obstetrics and gynecology at Stanford, points out that an FDA-approved female testosterone product could offer standardized dosing, clear safety-monitoring protocols, and potentially unlock insurance coverage that currently eludes off-label prescribing.

Stanford is currently running a pilot study, called MIX-T, examining how low-dose testosterone affects vaginal health and the vaginal microbiome in postmenopausal women, with results expected within two years. That research may help clarify what testosterone can and cannot do for women in midlife. For now, the FDA hearing will weigh the testimony of hundreds of women who say testosterone has changed their lives against the measured skepticism of researchers who say the evidence base is still too thin to support broad approval. The agency's decision will shape not only whether American women gain access to a standardized, approved treatment, but also what kind of evidence the medical system demands before calling a therapy safe and effective.

We do not have any evidence in women that it will improve muscle mass or bone density or mood or well-being or really any other metric.
— Dr. Stephanie Faubion, Mayo Clinic Center for Women's Health
An approved drug could offer standardized dosing, labeling, safety-monitoring guidance, and potentially improve insurance coverage.
— Dr. Diana Tordoff, Stanford University
Contact Us FAQ