Fast-spinning stars survive black hole encounters, revealing why their flares fade

A star that was already spinning rapidly cannot be spun up nearly as much.
The key to understanding why some black hole flares fade with each encounter lies in the star's initial rotation speed.
Mark

Why does a star that's already spinning fast produce dimmer flares than one that's spinning slowly?

Mimi

Because it can't spin up as much when the black hole's tidal forces grab it. A slowly spinning star gets accelerated dramatically—the material it loses comes back in a tight, concentrated burst. A fast-spinning star is already near its limit, so it doesn't accelerate much. The same amount of material spreads out over a longer time, and a slower drizzle of fuel produces a dimmer peak.

Mark

That seems like a small difference. How did it take two years to figure out?

Mimi

Because the simulations kept saying it shouldn't matter. The models showed that less material should still produce roughly the same brightness. The math wasn't working. They had to step back and ask what they weren't accounting for—and that's when the rotation became the key.

Mark

So how did these stars end up spinning so fast in the first place?

Mimi

They were likely born in extremely tight binary systems, where two stars orbit so close to each other that tidal forces lock their rotation to their orbital period. The tighter the orbit, the faster they have to spin. Then a supermassive black hole tears the binary apart, and one star gets captured.

Mark

That seems like an incredibly specific scenario. Are you saying this happens often?

Mimi

We've only found about ten of these repeating systems so far, so it's rare. But the mechanism—the Hills process—has been theorized for decades. This work finally gives it real observational teeth. And it might explain some of the strange stars we see around Sagittarius A* in our own galaxy.

Mark

So the same thing that explains fading flares in distant galaxies might have shaped our own black hole's neighborhood?

Mimi

Exactly. It's the same physics playing out at different scales. That's what makes this work significant—it connects observations across the universe to a single underlying mechanism.

  • A stubborn contradiction had stalled researchers for two years: models predicted that repeating stellar encounters with black holes should produce flares of consistent brightness, yet roughly four in ten known systems grow progressively dimmer with each pass.
  • The overlooked variable was the star's own spin — a rapidly rotating star resists the black hole's tidal torque, meaning stripped debris drifts back more slowly and produces a fainter, more drawn-out burst of light.
  • Doctoral student Ananya Bandopadhyay and her colleagues at Syracuse University cracked the puzzle by modeling how pre-existing stellar rotation fundamentally changes the timing and intensity of material falling onto the black hole's accretion disk.
  • A second mystery immediately surfaced: why would these stars already be spinning so fast before their first encounter, and how did they end up in such tight, recurring orbits around a supermassive black hole?
  • The Hills mechanism — in which a binary star system is torn apart by a black hole, ejecting one star and capturing the other — elegantly resolves both questions, since only an extremely compact binary would produce both the rapid spin and the close orbit observed.
  • The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal, may also illuminate the unusual stellar populations orbiting Sagittarius A*, suggesting our own galaxy's central black hole has claimed survivors through this same violent process.

In the long conversation between stars and the black holes that anchor galaxies, astronomers at Syracuse University have found a new kind of survivor — one whose fate is written not in its destruction, but in the speed of its spin. By recognizing that a star's pre-existing rotation shapes how violently a black hole can twist it further, researchers have explained why some stars return to their cosmic tormentor again and again, each visit quieter than the last. The discovery reaches back to a mechanism theorized for decades — the Hills process, in which binary stars are torn apart near black holes — suggesting that the most intimate stellar partnerships may be what deliver these spinning survivors into their extraordinary, recurring orbits.

Astronomers have long known that some stars survive close encounters with supermassive black holes, their cores intact, only to return months or years later for another brush with forces that seem designed to destroy them. Each pass strips away stellar material, and the falling debris ignites a burst of radiation around the black hole. These repeating partial tidal disruption events are rare enough that finding even one is remarkable — finding a handful has given researchers a cosmic laboratory in which to watch the same star and the same black hole interact across time.

But a puzzle emerged. In roughly four of the ten known repeating systems, the flares grow progressively dimmer with each return. Existing models said this shouldn't happen: even as a star shed less material on successive passes, the peak brightness of each flare should remain roughly constant. For two years, researchers at Syracuse University found themselves unable to resolve the contradiction.

The breakthrough came from reconsidering something that had been largely ignored: how fast the star was already spinning before its first encounter. Doctoral student Ananya Bandopadhyay, working with postdoctoral researcher Benjamin Amend and associate professor Eric Coughlin, realized that a rapidly rotating star responds very differently to a black hole's tidal torque. A star that is already spinning fast cannot be spun up as dramatically, which means the stripped debris takes longer to fall back toward the black hole. That slower, more gradual return produces a dimmer peak — precisely what the observations showed.

This raised a further question: why would such a star already be spinning so rapidly? The answer points to the Hills mechanism, in which a tight binary star system wanders too close to a supermassive black hole. The black hole tears the pair apart, ejecting one star into the galaxy and capturing the other into a new orbit. For the captured star to end up in the extraordinarily close orbit seen in these repeating systems, the original binary must have been extremely compact — and that same compactness would have forced the star to spin fast long before it was ever separated from its companion.

The elegance of the explanation is that it resolves multiple mysteries at once: the fading flares, the tight orbits, and the rapid pre-existing rotation all follow from a single violent origin. Coughlin notes the same process may have shaped the unusual stellar populations now orbiting Sagittarius A*, the Milky Way's own central black hole — suggesting that some of our galaxy's most extreme stars arrived there through the same intimate catastrophe that explains the dimming flares in distant galaxies.

Astronomers have long known that stars can venture too close to supermassive black holes without being instantly obliterated. Some survive these encounters, their cores remaining intact, only to return months or years later for another brush with gravitational forces that would seem to guarantee destruction. Each time they pass, they shed material—stellar skin stripped away by tidal forces—and that falling debris lights up the darkness around the black hole in a burst of radiation. These repeating partial tidal disruption events, or rpTDEs, are rare enough that finding even one is noteworthy. Finding a handful has allowed astronomers to watch the same star interact with the same black hole again and again, a cosmic laboratory of sorts.

But the observations have posed a puzzle. In roughly four of the ten known repeating systems, the flares grow progressively dimmer with each return. This should not happen, at least not according to the models that physicists had built to describe these encounters. The simulations suggested that even as a star lost less material during successive passes—a natural consequence of having already shed its outer layers—the peak brightness of the resulting flare should remain roughly constant. The material might be less abundant, but it should still arrive at the black hole's accretion disk in a concentrated enough burst to produce a similarly bright flash. For two years, researchers at Syracuse University found themselves stuck on this contradiction.

The breakthrough came from reconsidering a property of the star that had been largely overlooked: how fast it was already spinning before its first encounter with the black hole. Doctoral student Ananya Bandopadhyay, working with postdoctoral researcher Benjamin Amend and associate professor Eric Coughlin, realized that a rapidly rotating star behaves fundamentally differently from a slowly rotating one when subjected to the black hole's tidal torque. When a star approaches a black hole, the gravitational forces do more than pull material away from it—they also twist it, causing it to spin faster. But a star that is already rotating at high speed cannot be spun up as dramatically. This seemingly small difference has large consequences. The timing of the material's return to the black hole changes. Less acceleration means the stripped debris takes longer to fall back, spreading the influx over a longer period. A more gradual arrival produces a dimmer peak, which is exactly what astronomers have observed.

This finding raised a second question: Why would a star approaching a supermassive black hole already be spinning so rapidly? The answer may lie in a mechanism known as the Hills process, named for the physicist Jack Hills. Imagine two stars in a tight binary orbit around each other, their dance so intimate that tidal forces lock each one's rotation to their shared orbital period. The tighter the binary, the faster each star must spin. Now imagine this binary system wandering too close to a supermassive black hole. The black hole's gravity is strong enough to tear the pair apart. One star is ejected into the galaxy at high speed, while the other is captured into a new orbit around the black hole itself. For the captured star to end up in the extraordinarily tight orbit observed in rpTDEs—one that brings it back to the black hole every few months—the original binary must have been extremely compact. And that same compactness would have forced the captured star to spin rapidly before it was ever torn away from its companion.

The elegance of this explanation is that it accounts for multiple mysteries at once. The rapid pre-existing rotation explains the fading flares. The need for a very tight binary to produce the observed orbital configuration explains why these stars end up in such extreme orbits in the first place. And the Hills mechanism, which has been theorized for decades, finally has observational support. Coughlin notes that this same process may have shaped the unusual stellar populations orbiting Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way. Some of the stars now dancing around our galaxy's central black hole may have arrived there through the same violent binary disruption that explains the fading flares in distant galaxies. The work, published in The Astrophysical Journal, represents a significant step forward in understanding not just these rare repeating events, but the broader physics of how stars and black holes interact across the cosmos.

We were puzzled by this for two years
— Ananya Bandopadhyay, doctoral student at Syracuse University
Each of these peculiarities can be explained by the same underlying phenomenon: the tidal destruction of a binary system and the capture of one of the stars
— Eric Coughlin, associate professor of physics at Syracuse University
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Science Daily ↗
Contáctanos FAQ