Exotic pet owner killed by tiger he fought to keep

Norman Buwalda, 66, was fatally mauled to death by his pet tiger. A 10-year-old child was previously mauled and severely injured by the same tiger in 2004.
He trusted animals more than people, felt closer to them.
A neighbour's recollection of what Buwalda had told her about his relationship with the exotic animals he kept.
Mark

So he won in court. He had the legal right to keep these tigers. Why did the township even try to ban them in the first place?

Mimi

A ten-year-old was mauled in 2004. Severe injuries to the neck and head. The child had slipped and fallen near a tiger Buwalda had brought out on a chain for photographs. That's what prompted the bylaw.

Luke

But Buwalda was never charged for that attack, right? Because he was legally entitled to own the animals?

Mimi

Correct. The law was on his side even after the child was hurt. So when the township tried to ban exotic animals, he challenged it and won.

Mark

And then six years later, he's killed by the same species of animal. Do we know if it was the same tiger that attacked the child?

Luke

The source doesn't confirm that. We know it was a Siberian tiger in 2004 and a forty-seven-stone tiger in 2010, but there's no explicit statement that they're the same animal.

Mimi

What we do know is that Buwalda had two tigers on the property. One was forty-six and a half stone, another was forty-seven stone. The one that killed him was the heavier one.

Mark

And nobody saw what happened inside the cage?

Mimi

No. A family member found his body and locked the tiger away before calling police. The constable said they don't know what actually took place.

Luke

So we have the outcome—a man dead, mauled—but the specific sequence of events is unknowable. We only know he went in to feed it.

Mimi

That's right. The neighbours had been fighting for years to have the animals removed. All their attempts failed. Buwalda believed he understood these animals better than he understood people.

  • A 10-year-old child was mauled near one of Buwalda's tigers in 2004, prompting local authorities to ban exotic animals from private land — a ban Buwalda refused to accept.
  • Buwalda waged a two-year legal battle all the way to an Ontario Superior Court, ultimately winning the right to keep his two lions, two tigers, and a cougar on his rural property.
  • Neighbours spent years warning that the situation was dangerous, but every complaint and every effort to have the animals removed was blocked by Buwalda's hard-won legal protections.
  • On the morning of January 10, 2010, Buwalda entered the enclosure of a 47-stone tiger to feed it and was killed — his body discovered by a family member who managed to lock the animal away before calling police.
  • In the aftermath, the tiger was rehomed and his entire collection disbanded, erasing in days the collection he had spent years in court fighting to preserve.

In January 2010, Norman Buwalda, a 66-year-old exotic animal enthusiast in Southwold, Ontario, was killed by the tiger he had spent years in court defending his right to keep. His story sits at the intersection of human will and natural law — a man who believed so deeply in his bond with wild creatures that he fought the state for the privilege, only to discover that the animal he championed observed no such agreement. The legal system granted him his victory; nature rendered its own verdict.

Norman Buwalda was sixty-six years old and legally vindicated when he walked into a tiger's cage for the last time. The animal he went to feed that January morning in 2010 was the same one at the centre of a years-long legal fight — and the same one that had mauled a ten-year-old child on his Southwold, Ontario property six years before.

The 2004 attack had occurred when Buwalda led a Siberian tiger out of its compound on a chain leash so a boy could photograph it for a school project. The child suffered severe injuries to his neck and head. The township responded by passing an exotic animal bylaw banning wild beasts from private land. Buwalda, a wealthy Dutch native and chairman of the Canadian Exotic Animal Owner's Association, responded by taking the township to court — and winning. An Ontario Superior Court judge struck down the bylaw as flawed and too broad. His collection of two lions, two tigers, and a cougar remained.

Neighbours had spent nearly half a decade trying to have the animals removed. None of it worked. One neighbour recalled Buwalda insisting his animals wouldn't hurt a fly. Another described him as a lonely man who said he trusted animals more than people. On January 10, 2010, a family member found his body and managed to lock the tiger in a separate section of the enclosure before calling police. Officers arrived to find the animal pacing inside. There were no witnesses to what had happened in the cage.

The tiger was subsequently rehomed. The collection was disbanded. The court victory Buwalda had fought so hard to secure outlasted him by less than a year — ending not in a courtroom, but in the enclosure of an animal that had never agreed to any of the terms.

Norman Buwalda was sixty-six years old when he entered the cage of a tiger weighing forty-seven stone to feed the animal on a January morning in 2010. He did not leave that enclosure alive. The tiger that killed him was the same one he had fought through the courts to keep, the same one he had won the legal right to possess, the same one that had mauled a ten-year-old child six years earlier on his property in Southwold, Ontario.

Buwalda, a wealthy Dutch native, had spent two years battling Southwold Township over an exotic animal bylaw that would have banned wild beasts from private land. The township had passed the ban in response to the 2004 attack on the child, who had slipped and fallen near a Siberian tiger that Buwalda had led out of its compound on a heavy chain leash so the boy could photograph it for a school project. The child suffered severe injuries to his neck and head. But Buwalda challenged the bylaw in court, and an Ontario Superior Court judge ruled it flawed and too broad. He won. The ban was struck down. Buwalda, who served as chairman of the Canadian Exotic Animal Owner's Association, had never faced charges for that first attack—he was legally entitled to own the animals—and he continued to keep his collection: two lions, two tigers, and a cougar, all housed in a screened-in outbuilding on his property near London, Ontario, roughly twenty-eight kilometres southwest of the city.

On January 10, 2010, Ontario Provincial Police arrived at Buwalda's home after a family member discovered his mutilated body and managed to lock the tiger in a separate section of the cage before calling for help. The police found the animal pacing inside its enclosure. Constable Troy Carlson stated that Buwalda had gone to feed the tiger when it attacked and killed him. No one had witnessed what happened inside the cage. The officer noted only that the animal had done what it did.

Neighbours had spent nearly half a decade trying to have the exotic animals removed from Buwalda's property. All their efforts had failed. Joanne Does, who lived nearby, told the Toronto Star that Buwalda had once told her he trusted animals more than people, that he felt closer to them. She described him as appearing like a bully but said he was a very sad man, lonely. Another neighbour, Patricia England, recalled that Buwalda had insisted his animals wouldn't hurt a fly. She said that as beings on this planet, everyone has a place—but Buwalda's home was not the right place for wild animals. It was not the animal's fault, she said. It was just doing what a tiger does.

Following Buwalda's death, the tiger that killed him was taken away and rehomed. His collection was disbanded. The legal battle that had consumed two years of his life, the court victory he had secured, the right he had fought so hard to preserve—all of it ended in the cage where he had gone to feed an animal he believed he understood better than any person.

The owner went out to feed the tiger which was in a cage or large pen and the animal attacked him and killed him. We don't know what actually took place because no one witnessed it.
— Ontario Provincial Police Constable Troy Carlson
It's not the animal's fault. It was just doing what a tiger does.
— Neighbour Patricia England
Contattaci Domande frequenti