When a major broadcast network publishes a story inflating a family's business dealings by a factor of fifty, then quietly removes it without explanation, the episode raises questions that reach beyond a simple factual correction. ABC News finds itself at the center of a federal inquiry call after a report linking the Trump sons to billions in Pentagon contracts was retracted, rewritten, and stripped of its original byline — a sequence of events that Senator Bernie Moreno and Eric Trump argue demands more than an internal editorial review. At stake is not merely journalistic accuracy, but the
Eric Trump backs FCC probe into ABC's retracted Pentagon contracts story
delete it under the cover of darkness with no explanation
Mark
So what's the actual factual error here? Is it just that they got a number wrong?
Mimi
It's bigger than that. They said 1789 Capital invested $2.5 billion in Anduril. That $2.5 billion was the entire fundraising round. 1789 Capital actually put in about $50 million. That's a fifty-to-one difference.
Luke
Right, but we should be clear: the source material doesn't say whether that was a typo, a misunderstanding of the financing structure, or something else. We know the error existed and was corrected. We don't know how it got there.
Mimi
Fair. What we do know is that the story disappeared for a day and came back rewritten. And there's reporting suggesting the editors defended it before it was pulled.
Mark
Why does that matter? Isn't that just how corrections work sometimes?
Luke
It matters because Moreno is asking whether this was negligence or something more deliberate. If editors stood by the story initially, then it wasn't obviously broken to them at the time.
Mimi
And Eric Trump is saying you can't just delete something that went viral and republish it quietly. There's a public trust question underneath.
Mark
Does the FCC actually have the power to do what Morero is asking?
nLuke: That's the thing—the letter frames it as a broadcaster licensing question. ABC is owned by Disney, which holds broadcast licenses. Whether the FCC would actually open an investigation, and what they'd be investigating, is still unclear.
Mimi
The real pressure point is the question Moreno keeps asking: who approved this? If no one can answer that, it looks worse.
Mark
And ABC hasn't answered?
Mimi
Not yet. They haven't commented on any of it.
Il Polso
- A story claiming Trump family ventures secured billions in Pentagon contracts turned out to have inflated the actual investment figure by roughly fifty times, transforming a $50 million stake into a $2.5 billion headline.
- ABC News deleted the article without explanation, then republished a rewritten version with a new byline and buried corrections — a sequence critics say looks less like a correction and more like damage control under pressure.
- Internal emails obtained by Semafor suggest ABC editors initially defended the story to Anduril's spokesperson rather than acknowledging errors, directly contradicting the network's later claim that the piece had simply been published 'prematurely.'
- Senator Bernie Moreno has formally asked FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to investigate who approved the story, whether the reporter faced discipline, and whether ABC violated its obligations as a licensed broadcaster.
- Eric Trump amplified the probe publicly, arguing that a network cannot publish a damaging falsehood, allow it to spread virally, and then erase it quietly — and that someone inside ABC must be held accountable.
When a major broadcast network publishes a story inflating a family's business dealings by a factor of fifty, then quietly removes it without explanation, the episode raises questions that reach beyond a simple factual correction. ABC News finds itself at the center of a federal inquiry call after a report linking the Trump sons to billions in Pentagon contracts was retracted, rewritten, and stripped of its original byline — a sequence of events that Senator Bernie Moreno and Eric Trump argue demands more than an internal editorial review. At stake is not merely journalistic accuracy, but the accountability structures that govern licensed broadcasters and the public trust they are meant to steward.
Eric Trump this week backed a federal investigation into ABC News, lending his voice to Senator Bernie Moreno's call for the Federal Communications Commission to examine how the network published — and then silently erased — a story claiming his family's venture capital firm had secured billions in Pentagon contracts through defense contractor Anduril Industries.
The original article, posted last Wednesday, asserted that 1789 Capital had made a $2.5 billion investment in Anduril. The figure was wrong by an order of magnitude: that sum represented Anduril's entire fundraising round, while 1789 Capital's actual stake was approximately $50 million. Within a day the story disappeared without comment. By Friday, ABC had republished a substantially rewritten version under a new headline, with the byline reassigned to the generic 'ABC News' and corrections folded quietly into the text.
What elevated the episode beyond a routine correction was the question of internal conduct. Emails reviewed by Semafor show ABC editors initially defended the published story to an Anduril spokesperson rather than conceding errors — a posture that sits uneasily alongside the network's later characterization of the piece as having been published 'prematurely,' language that implies accident rather than a deliberate editorial stance that was subsequently reversed.
In his letter to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, Moreno demanded to know who approved the story, whether the original reporter had faced any discipline, and whether ABC had breached its broadcaster obligations — framing the episode as a 'political hit job.' Eric Trump echoed those demands on social media, arguing that a network cannot publish a damaging falsehood, let it spread, and then delete it under cover of darkness with no apology. ABC News did not respond to requests for comment, leaving the central questions — honest mistake or managed retreat — unanswered as the prospect of a formal FCC review takes shape.
Eric Trump threw his weight behind a federal investigation into ABC News this week, backing a call from Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio to have the Federal Communications Commission examine how the network published and then scrubbed a story about his family's business ties to defense contractor Anduril Industries.
The original article, posted to ABC's website last Wednesday under the headline "Trump sons' investments have won billions in Pentagon contracts since his election," made a straightforward claim: companies connected to Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump had secured billions in government contracts through their venture capital firm, 1789 Capital. Within a day, the story vanished from the site without explanation. On Friday, ABC republished a substantially rewritten version with a new headline, a corrected byline credited to "ABC News" rather than the original reporter, and a series of factual corrections buried inside.
The core error was a matter of scale and attribution. The original story had stated that 1789 Capital, where Trump Jr. serves as a partner, had made a $2.5 billion investment in Anduril. In reality, that $2.5 billion figure represented Anduril's entire fundraising round. 1789 Capital's actual stake in the company was approximately $50 million—roughly fifty times smaller than what the article claimed. The revised version also clarified that Trump Jr. does not sit on the firm's investment decision-making committee, a detail the original story had left ambiguous.
In his letter to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, Moreno demanded to know who approved the story for publication, whether the author had been disciplined, and whether ABC News had violated its obligations as a licensed broadcaster. He framed the episode as a "political hit job" and called for a formal investigation. Eric Trump responded on social media Monday with enthusiasm for the probe, writing that ABC could not simply "publish a bullshit hit-piece, let it spread and go viral, then delete it 24 hours later, under the cover of darkness with no explanation or apology." He pressed the network to answer who had signed off on the story and whether anyone had been held accountable.
What complicates the narrative of a simple mistake is the question of how the story was handled internally. According to reporting from Semafor, emails between the original reporter, Nathan Lee, and an Anduril spokesperson show that ABC News editors initially defended the published story rather than acknowledging errors. A source connected to 1789 Capital told Fox News Digital that an ABC journalist involved with the story had defended it over the phone before the article was deleted. This contradicts ABC's public characterization to other news organizations that the story had been published "prematurely"—a framing that suggests an accident rather than a deliberate editorial choice that was later reconsidered.
ABC News did not respond to requests for comment on the specifics of the investigation call or the internal editorial process. The network's silence on these points leaves open the question of whether the deletion and revision represent a good-faith correction of honest mistakes, or something closer to damage control after the errors were challenged. Moreno's letter signals that at least one senator believes the FCC should examine not just what went wrong, but who knew what and when they knew it.
Citazioni salienti
You can't publish a bullshit hit-piece, let it spread and go viral, then delete it 24 hours later, under the cover of darkness with no explanation or apology.— Eric Trump, on social media
We must know who signed off on the publication of this false story, who may have asked to profit from the attack, and whether ABC News's conduct violated its obligations as a licensee.— Sen. Bernie Moreno, in letter to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su Fox News ↗
Politics & Governance