For a decade, stock markets have climbed to heights once thought impossible, and a quiet theory has taken hold among traders and economists: that governments have made catastrophic crashes a thing of the past. Known as the 'bliss trade,' this belief rests on the observed willingness of central banks and treasuries to rescue institutions too large to be allowed to fail. Yet history reminds us that the very safety net designed to prevent collapse can, by removing the fear of consequence, sow the conditions for a deeper one.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
· Jun 20, 2026
· economy
· 5 min read
Medium
Sourcing: Characterized
Does government safety net make stock markets crash-proof?
◉
Economy & Finance
6268 related articles
Chinese robotics giant Unitree soars 600% in Shanghai debut
BBC News · 100% match
Metals Rally Faces Critical Test as Inflation Data and Hormuz Tensions…
Moneycontrol.com · 99% match
Asia stocks surge on Fed rate-cut bets as inflation data clears path f…
Yahoo Canada Finance · 99% match
Dollar retreats as ECB hawkishness, U.S. inflation data loom
Devdiscourse · 99% match
US Euro Sale to Support Yen Caught ECB Off Guard
Google News · 99% match
Related Coverage
The New York Times · Aug 19
The 'Crack Spread' Is Keeping Gas Prices High Despite Stable Crude
The 'crack spread'—the profit margin between crude oil and refined products—is keeping gas prices elevated despite stabl…
Lowy Institute · Aug 19 Australia can lead Physical AI testing as China, US race for robotics dominanceAs humanoid robotics converge with advanced AI, Australia can capture value by becoming a global testing and validation …
Google News · Aug 19 Trump Pauses 50% Canadian Tariffs for 3 Days Amid Last-Minute DealTrump temporarily halts threatened 50% tariffs on Canadian goods for three days following announcement of a last-minute …
CNA · Aug 19 India's graduates face uncertain futures as universities struggle to keep pace with job marketIndian universities are producing more graduates than ever, but youth unemployment remains high as the economy fails to …
Bias & Framing
⚖
ABC presents balanced analysis of 'bliss trade' theory with expert warnings about moral hazard risks, avoiding strong advocacy while acknowledging both market optimism and systemic vulnerabilities.
Bias Direction
center
Confidence
HIGH
Balanced skepticism: The article frames the 'bliss trade' as a plausible but contested theory by presenting supporting logic alongside expert cautions. Uses rhetorical questions ('But is that nonsense?') to invite critical thinking rather than assert conclusions.
one heck of a run
bliss
lethal for the economy
too big to fail
investment hubris
Perspective from financial institutions or market participants defending current safeguards
Views from economists who believe government intervention has successfully prevented systemic collapse
Retail investor sentiment or experiences
International regulatory perspectives beyond US context
Historical comparison to pre-GFC market dynamics
Geopolitical Impact
🌎
Debate over whether government safety nets have eliminated stock market crash risk reveals systemic moral hazard and concentration vulnerabilities with potential global economic consequences.
Escalation Risk
high
Confidence
HIGH
United States
Australia
Global financial markets
OECD economies
Central banks and governments have consolidated economic control through implicit guarantees to major financial institutions, shifting risk from private actors to public sector. This creates asymmetric power where large corporations gain implicit state backing while retail investors bear disproportionate downside risk. Emerging markets lack equivalent safety nets, widening developed-developing economy divergence.
Similar to pre-1929 market euphoria and the 2008 GFC moral hazard that preceded systemic collapse. The 'Greenspan put' and subsequent TARP bailouts established precedent for state intervention, but concentration in mega-cap indices (S&P 500 concentration at historic highs) mirrors pre-crash conditions.
Economic Lens
📈
Government safety nets may create false market stability through the 'bliss trade,' but moral hazard and index concentration risks could trigger severe crashes despite policy support.
Market Signal
mixed
Confidence
MED
Financial Services
Banking
Superannuation/Pension Funds
Equity Markets
Insurance
Australian households benefit from superannuation gains in the short term, but face elevated crash risk if moral hazard incentivizes excessive risk-taking by financial institutions. Retirement savings could be severely impacted by a concentrated market downturn.
Regulators may need to strengthen capital requirements, limit executive compensation tied to risk-taking, and reduce index concentration to prevent systemic failure. Central banks face pressure to clarify implicit guarantees to avoid encouraging reckless behavior while maintaining financial stability.