In the long and troubled reckoning between martial valor and moral accountability, Australia now confronts one of its most consequential moments: Ben Roberts-Smith, the nation's most decorated living soldier, has been arrested and charged with five counts of war crime murder for allegedly killing unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012. The charges emerge from a years-long investigation into the conduct of elite SAS troops, and they arrive after civil courts already found it probable that unlawful killings occurred — yet the criminal threshold demands something harder to establish: cert
Decorated Australian veteran charged with five war crime murders in Afghanistan
Five unarmed Afghan civilians were allegedly killed while detained and under control of Australian Defence Force members.
detained, unarmed, and under control when they were killed
Mark
So he's been charged with five murders, but the civil courts already found he likely killed four people unlawfully. Why does it matter that the standard is different now?
Mimi
Because "likely" and "beyond reasonable doubt" are worlds apart legally. Civil courts use a balance of probabilities—basically, is it more likely than not? Criminal courts need near certainty. The same facts might not be enough to convict him.
Luke
Right, and we should be clear: the civil court found he likely killed four. The criminal charges are for five. So there's at least one victim not covered by the earlier ruling.
Mark
Who were these five people? Are they named anywhere?
Mimi
The source doesn't name them. We know they were unarmed, detained, and under ADF control. But their identities aren't in the reporting.
Luke
That's a real gap. These are specific people who died. The fact that we don't know their names says something about how this story has been told so far.
Mark
What about the other soldier, Schulz? Is his case moving forward?
Mimi
He's pleaded not guilty to one count of war crime murder. The victim there is named—Dad Mohammad—shot three times in the head in a wheat field in 2012. But we don't know how far along his trial is.
Luke
And we should note: the 2020 military report found 39 unlawful killings total, but only two soldiers have been charged so far. That's a huge gap between what the military found and what's being prosecuted.
Mark
Why would that be?
Mimi
The source doesn't say. Could be evidentiary issues, could be command structure questions, could be ongoing investigations. But it's worth asking.
Luke
Exactly. And the Office of the Special Investigator looked at 53 alleged war crimes and closed 39 without charges. We don't know why those closed. That matters for understanding what this prosecution actually represents.
O Pulso
- Australia's most celebrated living veteran was arrested at Sydney Airport and now faces five charges of war crime murder, each carrying a potential life sentence.
- The alleged victims were unarmed Afghan detainees — not combatants — shot while under the control of Australian Defence Force members, making the moral weight of the charges especially grave.
- Roberts-Smith has already lost a civil defamation case in which three federal judges unanimously found it probable he unlawfully killed Afghan noncombatants, but criminal conviction demands proof beyond reasonable doubt — a far steeper climb for prosecutors.
- His case is the second war crimes prosecution to emerge from a sweeping 2020 military report that documented 39 unlawful killings by elite Australian troops, with 53 alleged war crimes investigated in total.
- Authorities have been careful to frame the charges as targeting individual conduct, not the broader military — but the shadow over Australia's two-decade Afghanistan campaign grows darker with each proceeding.
In the long and troubled reckoning between martial valor and moral accountability, Australia now confronts one of its most consequential moments: Ben Roberts-Smith, the nation's most decorated living soldier, has been arrested and charged with five counts of war crime murder for allegedly killing unarmed Afghan detainees between 2009 and 2012. The charges emerge from a years-long investigation into the conduct of elite SAS troops, and they arrive after civil courts already found it probable that unlawful killings occurred — yet the criminal threshold demands something harder to establish: certainty beyond reasonable doubt. What unfolds next will test not only one man's legacy, but Australia's willingness to hold its heroes to the same standards it asks of others.
Ben Roberts-Smith, 47, holder of the Victoria Cross and Australia's most decorated living veteran, was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday after arriving on a flight from Brisbane. He faces five counts of war crime murder, each punishable by life imprisonment, and was expected to appear in court the following day.
The charges allege that between 2009 and 2012, while deployed in Afghanistan, Roberts-Smith killed five unarmed Afghans who were detained and not participating in hostilities. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said it would be alleged that he either fired the shots himself or directed subordinates to do so in his presence.
The criminal case follows a bruising civil defeat. Roberts-Smith had sued Australian newspapers over 2018 reporting that accused him of war crimes, but a federal court found most allegations proven on a balance of probabilities — a ruling upheld unanimously on appeal and later refused review by Australia's highest court. The criminal standard, however, is considerably higher: guilt must be established beyond reasonable doubt.
He is only the second Australian veteran of the Afghanistan campaign to face criminal war crime charges, following former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz, who has pleaded not guilty to a single count of murder.
The charges are part of a broader national reckoning. A 2020 military report found evidence that elite SAS and commando troops unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and civilians. Of 53 alleged war crimes examined by the Office of the Special Investigator, 39 were closed without charges. Around 40,000 Australians served in Afghanistan over two decades, with 41 losing their lives.
Commissioner Barrett was careful to note that the alleged misconduct involves only a small number of soldiers, and that the vast majority of Australian Defence Force members served with honor. The distinction is important — but as Roberts-Smith's case moves into criminal court, the question of what was done in Australia's name, and by whom, will not easily be set aside.
Ben Roberts-Smith, the most decorated living veteran in Australia, was arrested at Sydney Airport on Tuesday after stepping off a flight from Brisbane. The 47-year-old former Special Air Service Regiment corporal now faces five counts of war crime murder, each carrying a potential life sentence. Police say he will appear in court Wednesday and may seek bail, but for now he remains in custody.
The charges allege that between 2009 and 2012, while serving in Afghanistan, Roberts-Smith killed five unarmed Afghans. According to Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett, the victims were not engaged in active hostilities at the time. They were detained, unarmed, and under the control of Australian Defence Force members when they were shot. Barrett stated that it will be alleged the accused either fired the shots himself or ordered subordinate ADF members to do so in his presence.
Roberts-Smith earned both the Victoria Cross and the Medal of Gallantry for his service in Afghanistan, making him one of Australia's most celebrated soldiers. He is only the second Australian veteran of the Afghanistan campaign to face war crime charges. The first is former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz, 44, who has pleaded not guilty to a single count of war crime murder for allegedly shooting an Afghan man named Dad Mohammad three times in the head in a wheat field in Uruzgan province in May 2012.
The criminal charges come after a significant legal defeat for Roberts-Smith. In September of last year, Australia's highest court declined to hear his appeal against a 2023 federal court finding that he likely unlawfully killed four Afghans. Three federal judges had unanimously rejected his earlier appeal. This civil court ruling came after Roberts-Smith sued several newspapers for defamation over 2018 articles accusing him of war crimes. While the civil courts found most of those allegations proven on a balance of probabilities, the criminal standard is far stricter: guilt must be established beyond reasonable doubt.
The charges are rooted in a broader reckoning with Australian military conduct in Afghanistan. A military report released in 2020 found evidence that elite SAS and commando regiment troops unlawfully killed 39 Afghan prisoners, farmers, and other noncombatants. The Office of the Special Investigator, established to investigate war crime allegations, has examined 53 alleged war crimes in total. Of those, 39 investigations concluded without charges being filed. Around 40,000 Australian military personnel served in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021, with 41 killed in the campaign.
Police Commissioner Barrett emphasized that the alleged conduct involves only a small number of soldiers. "The overwhelming majority of our ADF do our country proud," she said, stressing that the charges do not reflect the values or conduct of most service members. The distinction matters: the investigation has cast a shadow over Australia's entire military presence in Afghanistan, yet the charges so far target individuals, not systemic failure. Roberts-Smith's case will now move through the criminal courts, where prosecutors must prove each killing beyond reasonable doubt—a higher bar than the civil courts cleared.
Citações Notáveis
It will be alleged the victims were detained, unarmed and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.— Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett
The alleged conduct related to these charges is confined to a very small section of our trusted and respected ADF.— Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em The Star ↗
Crime & Justice