David George Gordon, who died at 76, spent his life asking a question most people preferred not to consider: what if the food of the future was already beneath our feet? Through his cookbook and theatrical television appearances, he worked to dissolve the cultural disgust surrounding insect consumption, positioning entomophagy not as novelty but as necessity. He did not live to see the world fully converted, but he lived long enough to watch a fringe idea become infrastructure.
David George Gordon, Bug-Eating Pioneer, Dies at 76
He made it possible to imagine a future where the squeamishness was gone
Mark
What made Gordon different from other people talking about sustainable food?
Mimi
He didn't just write about it. He got on television with live tarantulas. He made it a performance, not a lecture.
Luke
Do we know how much his TV appearances actually changed people's minds? Or did they mostly just get ratings?
Mimi
That's fair. The source doesn't quantify the impact. But he was visible in a way most food scientists aren't.
Mark
Why insects specifically? Why not just eat less meat?
Mimi
Insects need almost no water, no land, no feed compared to cattle or chickens. The math is different.
Luke
And yet most Americans still won't eat them. So how much did his work actually move the needle?
Mimi
He opened the door. Whether people walk through it is a different question.
Mark
Did he live to see insect proteins become commercial products?
Mimi
The source says companies are now building facilities to farm them at scale. So yes, he saw the beginning.
Luke
But we don't know if he saw it as success or as still incomplete.
Mimi
No. We only know he spent his life on it.
The Pulse
- Gordon's death closes the chapter on a singular career spent fighting one of the most visceral forms of human resistance — the refusal to eat what repulses us.
- His 'Eat-a-Bug Cookbook' and televised tarantula demonstrations were deliberate provocations designed not to shock, but to slowly dismantle a disgust that he believed was learned and therefore reversible.
- The urgency behind his work was never theatrical — it was mathematical: a growing global population, a finite planet, and a protein source that requires a fraction of the resources of conventional livestock.
- Insect-based proteins are now entering mainstream food products and industrial farming operations, suggesting the conversion Gordon sought is underway, even if incomplete.
- The question his legacy leaves open is not whether insects can feed the world, but whether cultural acceptance will arrive before the window of necessity closes.
David George Gordon, who died at 76, spent his life asking a question most people preferred not to consider: what if the food of the future was already beneath our feet? Through his cookbook and theatrical television appearances, he worked to dissolve the cultural disgust surrounding insect consumption, positioning entomophagy not as novelty but as necessity. He did not live to see the world fully converted, but he lived long enough to watch a fringe idea become infrastructure.
David George Gordon, who died on September 21 at 76, was a pioneer in a field most people preferred to ignore — the promotion of insects as food. He approached the work with the energy of a showman and the conviction of someone who believed he was solving a real problem.
His most enduring contribution was 'The Eat-a-Bug Cookbook,' which treated crickets, grasshoppers, and mealworms not as a dare but as legitimate ingredients, offering recipes alongside the environmental and nutritional rationale for eating them. Gordon understood, however, that a book could only reach so far. So he took to television, handling tarantulas and crickets on camera with practiced ease, staging demonstrations designed less to shock than to normalize — to suggest that the disgust people felt was cultural, not biological, and therefore could be overcome.
The arithmetic behind his advocacy was straightforward: insects require far less water, feed, and space than conventional livestock, produce less waste, and deliver comparable protein. A cricket, pound for pound, matches chicken. These were not arguments for the adventurous — they were arguments for the practical.
Gordon did not live to see full conversion. Most Americans still recoil at the thought. But the conversation he helped start has quietly become infrastructure — insect proteins are appearing in mainstream products, and companies are building cricket and mealworm farms at scale. The question is no longer whether insects could be food. It is whether the world will accept them quickly enough to matter.
David George Gordon, the man who spent decades trying to convince Americans that bugs belonged on the dinner plate, died on September 21 at the age of 76. He was a pioneer in a field that most people didn't know existed—the promotion of insects as food—and he approached the work with the energy of a carnival barker and the conviction of a true believer.
Gordon's most visible contribution to this cause was "The Eat-a-Bug Cookbook," a book that presented insects not as a dare or a stunt but as a legitimate answer to questions about protein, sustainability, and the future of food. The cookbook offered recipes and rationales, treating crickets and grasshoppers and mealworms as ingredients worthy of serious consideration. But Gordon understood that a book alone would not shift American attitudes. He needed to show people. He needed to put the bugs in front of them, alive and undeniable.
So he took to television. His cooking demonstrations became a fixture of the media landscape—boisterous, theatrical affairs where he would handle tarantulas and crickets with the casual confidence of someone who had made peace with the idea that insects were food. These appearances were not meant to shock, though shock was often the initial reaction. They were meant to normalize, to suggest that the disgust people felt was learned, not innate, and therefore could be unlearned.
Gordon's work arrived at a moment when the world was beginning to grapple with the arithmetic of feeding a growing population on a finite planet. Insects offered a solution that seemed almost too simple: they required far less water and feed than conventional livestock, they produced less waste, and they could be raised in small spaces. A cricket contains as much protein as a piece of chicken, pound for pound. A mealworm is efficient. These were not metaphors. They were facts.
What Gordon did was make those facts accessible. He translated the language of entomophagy—the eating of insects—from academic papers and development reports into something that could be discussed over dinner, or at least considered while watching television. He made it possible for people to imagine a future in which the squeamishness was gone and the practicality remained.
His legacy extends beyond the cookbook and the television appearances. He helped establish a conversation that is still unfolding. Insect-based proteins are now appearing in mainstream food products. Companies are building facilities to farm crickets and mealworms at scale. The idea that Gordon spent his career promoting—that insects could be part of the solution to global food security—is no longer fringe. It is becoming infrastructure.
Gordon died knowing that the world had not yet fully embraced his vision. Most Americans still recoil at the thought of eating bugs. But the conversation has shifted. The question is no longer whether insects could be food. The question is how quickly they will become food, and whether the world will accept them in time.
Notable Quotes
A cricket contains as much protein as a piece of chicken, pound for pound— Nutritional fact Gordon promoted
Want the full story?
Read the original at The New York Times ↗
Media & Entertainment