Across the borders that once divided them on cricket fields, twenty-one former captains of the game have found common cause in a quieter arena — the question of what a civilization owes even to those it has imprisoned. Imran Khan, seventy-three years old and held in a Pakistani cell since August 2023, is reportedly losing sight in his right eye while a Supreme Court order for proper medical assessment goes unfulfilled. The letter these former rivals signed together is not a political document so much as a moral one: a reminder that the obligations of basic decency do not pause for legal comple
Cricket captains urge Pakistan to provide proper medical care for jailed Imran Khan
Imran Khan, age 73, has spent over three years in custody with reported vision loss in his right eye and restricted access to medical care and family visits.
The basic decency of ensuring a court order is completed
Mark
Why did cricket captains feel they had to step in? This is a legal and political matter, not a sports issue.
Mimi
Because Imran Khan was one of them. He captained Pakistan to a World Cup victory. When you've competed against someone at that level, you know them differently than the public does. And when someone you know is seventy-three and losing his vision in prison, the legal arguments fade into the background.
Mark
But couldn't this be seen as interference in Pakistan's internal affairs?
Mimi
That's what makes the letter careful. They're not arguing about whether he's guilty or innocent. They're not taking a political side. They're simply saying: the court ordered this. The government should do it. That's not interference—that's asking for the rule of law to function.
Mark
What does the vision loss tell us about his condition?
Mimi
It tells us that time in custody is taking a physical toll, and that the authorities aren't treating it as urgent. Fifteen percent vision in one eye at seventy-three isn't something that reverses itself. Every week that passes without proper care is permanent damage.
Mark
Why did they emphasize that they were rivals?
Mimi
Because it matters. These are people from countries that have real tensions, real disputes. If they can set that aside to say something needs to be done, it carries weight. It says this isn't about geopolitics. It's about a basic standard of human treatment.
Mark
What happens if the government ignores this letter?
Mimi
The pressure doesn't disappear. The Supreme Court's order still stands. And now there's international attention from people who have credibility and no obvious political axe to grind. That makes it harder to ignore.
El Pulso
- Pakistan's Supreme Court ordered Khan transferred to a private hospital for independent medical evaluation — but he was returned to his cell within hours, the court's directive effectively ignored.
- Khan's lawyers report he has lost roughly 85% of vision in his right eye, a deterioration that prison authorities have failed to address despite repeated legal pressure.
- Twenty-one former cricket captains — rivals from India, Australia, England, and beyond — signed a joint letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif demanding compliance with the court's own ruling.
- The demands are precise: a Supreme Court-appointed medical board including Khan's personal physicians, weekly family visits as already ordered, and the simple completion of a process the court has already mandated.
- Khan's party has filed a contempt petition, and the international cricket community's intervention is amplifying pressure on a government that has so far declined to fully comply with its own judiciary.
Across the borders that once divided them on cricket fields, twenty-one former captains of the game have found common cause in a quieter arena — the question of what a civilization owes even to those it has imprisoned. Imran Khan, seventy-three years old and held in a Pakistani cell since August 2023, is reportedly losing sight in his right eye while a Supreme Court order for proper medical assessment goes unfulfilled. The letter these former rivals signed together is not a political document so much as a moral one: a reminder that the obligations of basic decency do not pause for legal complexity or state convenience.
In August 2023, Imran Khan — former Prime Minister, former cricket captain, seventy-three years old — was imprisoned on charges of corruption, leaking state secrets, and selling state gifts. He has denied all of it. His party calls the more than one hundred cases filed against him politically motivated. What is less disputed is what has happened to his body in the years since: his right eye is failing, with lawyers reporting he retains only fifteen percent of his vision there.
Pakistan's Supreme Court issued a clear directive — transfer Khan to a private hospital for a proper medical assessment, one that would include his own physicians. He was taken to a hospital. He was there for only a few hours, examined by a state-appointed team, and returned to his cell. The court's order, in any meaningful sense, was not fulfilled.
That gap between what a court ordered and what a government did is what moved twenty-one former cricket captains to write a letter. The signatories span generations and nations: Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Dev from India, Greg Chappell and Steve Waugh from Australia, Alastair Cook and Michael Atherton from England, among many others. They described themselves as former colleagues and rivals bound by something forged on cricket fields — a bond, they wrote, that transcends the borders and disputes that divide countries.
Their demands were three: a proper medical board as the court ordered, weekly family visits as the court ordered, and the basic completion of a process that should not, in their words, be controversial. Fourteen of them had signed a similar appeal in February. They were signing again.
Khan's party has filed a contempt petition arguing the government is in violation of the Supreme Court's directive. The cricket world, watching from outside the politics, has framed its appeal simply — whatever the legal arguments, a seventy-three-year-old man losing his sight in a cell deserves the medical care a court has already said he should receive.
On a Tuesday, Pakistan's Supreme Court issued an order: transfer the prisoner to a private hospital for medical examination. The prisoner was Imran Khan, seventy-three years old, who had been locked away since August 2023. The charges against him—leaking state secrets, selling state gifts, corruption—he has consistently denied. More than a hundred cases have been filed. His party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, calls them politically motivated.
What happened next is why twenty-one former cricket captains felt compelled to write a letter to Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. Khan was taken to the hospital, they learned, but only for a few hours. A state-appointed medical team examined him. Then he was returned to his cell. The court had ordered a proper assessment. It did not happen.
The signatories read like a roll call of cricket's modern history. Sunil Gavaskar, India's batting legend. Sir Alastair Cook, who captained England longer than almost anyone. Michael Atherton, Michael Brearley, Nasser Hussain, Andrew Strauss, David Gower. From Australia came Greg Chappell, who initiated the letter, along with Steve Waugh, Adam Gilchrist, Belinda Clark, and Kim Hughes. India sent Kapil Dev and Dilip Vengsarkar. These were not activists or politicians. They were men and women who had spent their lives competing against one another on cricket fields, and they were now united by something else entirely.
The letter made three specific demands. First: Khan must be assessed by a medical board appointed by Pakistan's Supreme Court, one that would include his own physicians. The reason was urgent and concrete. Khan's right eye was failing. Lawyers claimed he had retained only fifteen percent of his vision there, a deterioration that prison authorities had failed to address. Second: his family must be allowed to visit him weekly, as the court had ordered, without the interruptions and delays that had been happening. Third: the basic decency of completing a court-ordered medical process should not be controversial.
"Imran Khan is 73 years old and has now spent more than three years in custody," the letter read. "Whatever the legal and political arguments surrounding his case, the basic decency of ensuring a court-ordered medical process is actually completed is not, in our view, a controversial request." Fourteen of these same former captains had signed an earlier appeal in February, calling for humane treatment and proper medical care. Now they were signing again.
Khan's own party had filed a contempt petition, arguing that the government was violating the Supreme Court's directive by denying him access to his personal doctors. The court had ruled. The government had not complied. And now the cricket world was watching.
The signatories described themselves as "former colleagues and rivals who share a bond forged on the cricket field," a bond that "transcends the borders and disputes that too often divide countries." It was a deliberate statement. They were not speaking as Indians or Australians or English people. They were speaking as people who had known Khan as a competitor, as a captain, as someone who belonged to a world larger than any single nation's politics. What they were asking for—medical care, family visits, compliance with court orders—seemed, to them, to belong to that world too.
Citas Notables
Whatever the legal and political arguments surrounding his case, the basic decency of ensuring a court-ordered medical process is actually completed is not, in our view, a controversial request.— Letter from 21 former cricket captains, initiated by Greg Chappell
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en BBC ↗
Health & Medicine