Collingwood's alarm bells ring as form slump threatens top-four finish

It's Nick Daicos or bust at the moment
Collingwood's over-reliance on their star midfielder has become a structural vulnerability as other players' form has declined.
Mark

So Collingwood looked like they had it all figured out for most of the season. What actually changed?

Mimi

Their two biggest strengths just vanished. They were first in the league at converting chances inside 50 and second at stopping the other team from doing the same. Since round 18, they're 13th in both. It's not gradual—it's a cliff.

Luke

But we should note that's a four-week sample. One month of data. That matters for context.

Mark

And the Nick Daicos thing—is it really that bad, or are people overreacting?

Mimi

Forty-three percent of their scores in six weeks have gone through him. When he touches it seven times in a quarter, they win that quarter 77 percent of the time. When he gets four or fewer, it's 30 percent.

Luke

Those are real numbers, but they're also describing what happens when your best player is on the ball versus off it. That's not unique to Collingwood. The question is whether it's *worse* than it should be.

Mark

What about the way they're moving the ball? That seemed like a strength.

Mimi

It was. But now they're predictable. Against Brisbane, they kept trying the same long kick down the line, and it kept failing. They used to adjust, take risks, play different ways. Now they seem stuck.

Luke

The source doesn't say whether that's a coaching choice or a player execution issue, though. That's worth knowing.

Mark

Can McRae actually fix this in three games?

Mimi

He has options. Pendlebury back at half back for creativity, using Josh Daicos more in the midfield, moving McStay to defense. But time is the real problem.

Luke

And we don't know if those changes would work. They're possibilities, not solutions. The Hawks game this week will tell us a lot.

  • Collingwood have fallen from premiership favourites to fourth in the betting after losing three of their last four matches, including defeats to Brisbane, Gold Coast, and Fremantle.
  • The statistical collapse is stark — a team that ranked first in forward efficiency and second in defensive stinginess through round 17 now sits 13th in both categories, a deterioration that cuts to the core of what made them formidable.
  • Nick Daicos accounts for 43% of Collingwood's scores over the past six weeks, and the Pies win just 30% of quarters when he manages four or fewer disposals — a dependency that opposing coaches are already weaponising.
  • Ball movement has grown rigid and predictable, with the team repeating the same patterns under pressure rather than adapting, a far cry from the creative, risk-taking side that dominated the early season.
  • The worst-case scenario is now live: if results fall the wrong way, Collingwood could finish fifth with 17 wins — potentially the unluckiest team ever to miss the top four — with only three home-and-away games left to arrest the slide.

For much of 2025, Collingwood carried the quiet authority of a team that seemed to have already decided the season's outcome. Yet sport, like all human endeavour, resists inevitability — and three losses in four weeks have exposed the fragility beneath the Pies' dominance, revealing a side whose brilliance has grown dangerously concentrated in a single player. What was a coronation is now a reckoning, with the margin between a top-four finish and an early exit narrowing with each passing week.

Three losses in four weeks have transformed Collingwood's season from a procession into a genuine crisis. The Pies, who looked untouchable for the better part of 2025, have fallen to Brisbane, Gold Coast, and Fremantle in recent weeks, watching their grip on the ladder loosen with the finals approaching fast.

The numbers reveal a sudden and sharp decline. Through round 17, Collingwood ranked first in the competition for forward efficiency and second for defensive stinginess — clinical at both ends. Since round 18, they have ranked 13th in both categories. Their ability to transition from defence to attack, once a hallmark of their play, has also eroded; against Brisbane they managed just three successful transitions from 34 attempts. Individual form has followed the same downward curve, with Jamie Elliott, Steele Sidebottom, Jack Crisp, and Dan McStay all rating significantly lower than they did earlier in the season.

The most structural concern, however, is the team's reliance on Nick Daicos. The Brownlow Medal favourite is extraordinary, but 43 percent of Collingwood's scores over the past six weeks have flowed through him. The Pies win 77 percent of quarters when he accumulates seven or more disposals, and just 30 percent when he is held to four or fewer. Brisbane's game plan — keeping Dunkley and others focused on Daicos throughout — exposed exactly how little Collingwood can generate without him.

The ball movement has grown predictable too, with the team locked into a handball corridor style that opponents have learned to read. Against Brisbane in the final quarter, they attempted the same long kick down the line repeatedly, each time without success, and without the instinct to adjust.

The worst-case scenario is no longer abstract. Should Brisbane, Geelong, and Gold Coast win their remaining matches, Collingwood could finish fifth despite claiming 17 wins — a historically cruel outcome. Coach Craig McRae has options: Scott Pendlebury returning to half-back, Josh Daicos taking a larger midfield role, Dan McStay redeployed in defence. But with three games remaining before finals, the window to rediscover what made this team so compelling is closing quickly.

Three losses in four weeks have turned Collingwood's season from coronation into crisis. The Pies, who looked unbeatable for most of 2025, have stumbled badly—falling to Brisbane by 27 points, losing to Gold Coast and Fremantle in recent weeks, and watching their grip on the top of the ladder slip away with three home-and-away matches still to play. What was supposed to be a march to the finals has become a scramble just to stay in the top four.

The numbers tell a story of sudden, sharp decline. Between the opening round and round 17, Collingwood ranked first in the competition for scoring efficiency inside their attacking 50 and second for defensive stinginess in their own 50. They were clinical going forward and nearly impenetrable at the back. Since round 18, that elite profile has evaporated. Over the past month, they've ranked 13th in both metrics—a collapse in the very areas that had made them seem inevitable. Their ability to transition from defense to attack, a hallmark of recent premiership teams, has also deteriorated. They now rank 11th in that category, and against Brisbane managed just three successful transitions out of 34 attempts, their third-worst performance under Craig McRae.

The decline extends to individual form. Jamie Elliott, who was rated 12.2 through round 17, has dropped to 3.5 since. Steele Sidebottom has slipped from 12.7 to 9. Jack Crisp fell from 13.7 to 10.7. Dan McStay went from 8 to 5.6. Even the midfield mix—Ned Long, Tom Mitchell, Josh Daicos, Jordan De Goey rotating through the engine room—has felt disjointed. The team that was shooting the lights out early in the season has simply stopped executing at the same level, and the margin between their peak and their current form is stark enough to worry even optimistic observers.

But the most troubling problem is structural. Nick Daicos has been extraordinary—he's the favorite for the Brownlow Medal and plays with a class that sets him apart. Yet Collingwood has become dangerously reliant on him. When Daicos has seven or more disposals in a quarter, the Pies win that quarter 77 percent of the time. When he has four or fewer, they win just 30 percent of the time. More alarming: 43 percent of Collingwood's scores in the last six weeks have gone through Daicos. Brisbane's game plan against them was instructive—Josh Dunkley and the entire Lions team kept an eye on him at all times, and when they managed to contain him, Collingwood had no answer. It's a vulnerability that opposing coaches will exploit, and McRae knows it.

The ball movement has become predictable. Collingwood has leaned heavily on a handball corridor game, moving the ball in flow through the middle, but they've lost the chaos and flair that made them dangerous earlier in the season. Against Brisbane in the fourth quarter, they tried the same long kick down the line five or six times in succession, each time watching it come straight back at them. A couple of years ago, they would have adjusted, taken risks, played differently. Now they seem locked into one way of playing, and when it doesn't work, they have no pivot.

The worst-case scenario is no longer theoretical. If Brisbane, Geelong, and Gold Coast win all their remaining games—which they're favored to do—and Collingwood beats Hawthorn and Melbourne but loses to Adelaide, the Pies could finish fifth with 17 wins, the unluckiest team ever to miss the top four. They've gone from clear number one premiership favorites to about fourth in the betting. McRae has levers to pull: Scott Pendlebury could return to half back for creativity, Dan McStay has trained as a defender, Josh Daicos could be used more in the midfield rotation, and Dan Houston could find a different role. But with three games left before finals, the window to fix these problems is closing fast. The Hawks come next, and that game carries massive finals implications for both sides.

There are some alarm bells starting to ring at Collingwood
— Leigh Montagna, St Kilda champion and Fox Footy analyst
It's impossible to tag him, but a team tag is something I think you can explore. I loved what Brisbane did—the entire team was buying into stopping Daicos.
— David King, North Melbourne champion and Fox Footy analyst
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su FOX SPORTS ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti