Across China's cities, a quiet grief ritual has emerged at the intersection of heartbreak and artificial intelligence: young people reconstructing digital echoes of former partners from the intimate residue of shared lives. The technology promises a space to process loss, to speak what went unsaid, to sit with absence in a controlled and responsive form. Yet in offering the comfort of connection without the cost of vulnerability, it raises one of the oldest human questions in a new register — whether we heal by moving through pain, or by finding ever more sophisticated ways to remain inside it
China's AI ex-partner trend raises concerns over emotional dependency and privacy
The virtual ex is always available, never angry, never truly gone
Mark
Why would someone want to talk to an AI version of their ex? Doesn't that just keep them stuck?
Mimi
That's the tension at the heart of it. Some people say it helps them say goodbye—they can have conversations they never got to have, work through what went wrong. But you're right to be skeptical. There's a real risk that instead of moving on, you're just talking to a very convincing mirror of the past.
Mark
What about the privacy angle? These people are uploading incredibly personal data.
Mimi
Exactly. Chat logs, photos, memories of arguments—the most intimate details of a relationship. Once that's on a platform, you've lost control of it. There's no guarantee what the company does with it, who might access it, or how it could be used later.
Mark
Is there any evidence this actually helps people heal?
Mimi
That's the thing—there isn't much yet. The technology is new, and the psychological research hasn't caught up. We don't know if people who use these AI replicas actually recover better, or if they just become more attached to the past.
Mark
So it could actually make things worse?
Mimi
It could. By making it possible to never really leave a relationship, by always having someone to talk to who responds exactly the way you want them to, you might be training yourself to avoid the harder work of actually moving on.
Mark
What would you tell someone considering this?
Mimi
I'd ask them what they're really looking for. If it's a way to process something unfinished, maybe there are better options—a therapist, a trusted friend, time. But if they're looking for a way to keep someone in their life after they're gone, that's a different problem, and an AI isn't going to solve it.
Le Pouls
- A tool called Ex-partner.skill allows users to upload chat logs, photos, and personal memories to generate AI replicas that speak, reason, and remember like a former partner — making the ended relationship feel perpetually accessible.
- The deeper users go — feeding the system shared trips, private arguments, beloved habits — the more convincing the replica becomes, blurring the line between therapeutic revisitation and emotional entrapment.
- Privacy advocates are alarmed: the most intimate data of a relationship — the raw material of knowing another person — is now being surrendered to corporate servers with no clear guarantee of how it will be stored, accessed, or used.
- Psychologists warn that a virtual ex who is always available, never truly angry, and never capable of leaving may not dissolve attachment but calcify it, making genuine closure harder to reach.
- The trend forces a reckoning with what emotional technology is actually for — whether algorithms can facilitate healing or whether they are, at their most seductive, a sophisticated form of avoidance.
Across China's cities, a quiet grief ritual has emerged at the intersection of heartbreak and artificial intelligence: young people reconstructing digital echoes of former partners from the intimate residue of shared lives. The technology promises a space to process loss, to speak what went unsaid, to sit with absence in a controlled and responsive form. Yet in offering the comfort of connection without the cost of vulnerability, it raises one of the oldest human questions in a new register — whether we heal by moving through pain, or by finding ever more sophisticated ways to remain inside it.
In cities across China, a new grief ritual has taken shape. Young people navigating the aftermath of broken relationships are turning to artificial intelligence to reconstruct something of what was lost — not the person, but a digital echo. Using a platform called Ex-partner.skill, they upload months of text conversations, photographs, and social media traces. The system learns to speak in their ex's voice, deploy their particular phrases, and think in recognizable patterns. What emerges is a virtual companion that can discuss shared history as though the relationship never ended.
The process deepens over time. Users refine their replicas with layered memories — vacations, favorite foods, the arguments that finally broke things apart. Each addition makes the digital version more textured, more convincing. Proponents argue the technology fills a genuine need: in a culture where grief is difficult to process openly and therapy access remains uneven, a responsive digital presence might offer space to say what went unsaid and gradually come to terms with absence.
But the fault lines are significant. Privacy advocates point to the extraordinary intimacy of the data being surrendered — the most private details of a shared life, now stored on corporate servers with uncertain futures. And psychologists raise a harder concern: a virtual ex who is always available, always responsive, and never truly gone may not help users move forward so much as make it possible to never truly leave. The technology removes the risk of rejection while preserving the feeling of connection — which may be precisely what makes it dangerous.
As the replicas grow more sophisticated and more widely adopted, the questions they raise will only sharpen. Can an algorithm help someone heal, or does it extend the wound? For now, young people across China continue uploading their memories to machines, searching for closure in conversation with ghosts.
In cities across China, a new way of grieving has taken shape. Young people nursing the wounds of broken relationships are turning to artificial intelligence to resurrect what was lost—not the person, but a digital echo of them. They feed the algorithm their most intimate data: months of text conversations, photographs, social media posts, the small details of a life shared. The system, powered by a tool called Ex-partner.skill, learns to speak in their ex's voice, to use their particular phrases, to think in patterns that feel familiar. What emerges is a virtual companion that can talk back, remember shared moments, and offer the illusion of connection to someone who is no longer there.
The process begins simply enough. A user uploads the raw material of a relationship—chat logs, images, the digital footprints two people leave behind. The AI platform processes this data and generates a basic version of the replica. But the real work comes after. Users then feed the system deeper memories: vacations they took together, the foods their ex loved, the anniversaries that mattered, even the arguments that ended things. Each addition makes the digital version more convincing, more textured, more like the person it claims to represent. The result is a virtual ex-partner that can engage in conversation using familiar tones and thought patterns, capable of discussing shared history as though the relationship never ended.
Proponents of the technology argue it serves a genuine purpose. They contend that these AI replicas offer emotional comfort to people working through the aftermath of loss. In a culture where processing grief can be difficult and therapy access uneven, a digital version of an ex-partner might provide a space to revisit what happened, to say things left unsaid, to gradually come to terms with absence. The technology, in this framing, becomes a tool for healing—a way to move forward by moving through the past.
But the trend has also opened a fault line in how people think about technology, emotion, and what it means to recover from heartbreak. Privacy advocates worry about the data being uploaded to these platforms. Intimate conversations, photographs, personal habits—the material that makes someone knowable—now exists in digital form, stored on servers, processed by algorithms. There is no guarantee what happens to it, who might access it, or how it could be used. The very act of creating these replicas means surrendering some of the most private details of a relationship to a company's infrastructure.
There is also the question of what this technology does to the person using it. Creating an AI version of an ex-partner means spending time in conversation with something that mimics intimacy without being intimate. It means revisiting a relationship that has ended, again and again, in a controlled environment where the outcome never changes. Some psychologists worry this could deepen emotional dependency rather than resolve it—that users might find themselves unable to move forward because the technology makes it possible to never truly leave. The virtual ex is always available, always responsive, never angry, never truly gone. It offers the comfort of connection without the risk of rejection, which might be precisely the problem.
The trend raises harder questions about what technology should do in the realm of human emotion. Can an algorithm help someone heal, or does it simply extend the pain? Does creating a digital replica of an ex-partner represent a healthy way to process loss, or a way of avoiding it? These questions have no easy answers, and they will likely intensify as the technology becomes more sophisticated and more widely adopted. For now, in China, young people continue uploading their memories to machines, hoping to find closure in conversation with ghosts.
Citations marquantes
Advocates claim these AI replicas offer emotional solace and aid in overcoming past regrets— Proponents of the technology
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur South China Morning Post ↗
Technology