China, Philippines clash over ramming incident in disputed South China Sea

China keeps pushing. The Philippines keeps pushing back.
The confrontation near Second Thomas Shoal reflects a deepening stalemate over territorial control in the South China Sea.
Mark

Why does China care so much about this particular reef? It's just a submerged rock.

Mimi

Because it's not really about the rock. It's about the claim. If China can control the waters around Second Thomas Shoal, it strengthens its argument that it controls the entire South China Sea. That's three trillion dollars in commerce passing through every year.

Mark

But the Philippines got there first, in 1999. Doesn't that count for something?

Mimi

In international law, yes—it should. The arbitration court said so in 2016. But Beijing doesn't recognize that ruling. For China, this is about power, not precedent. The Philippines is much smaller, much weaker. China is testing whether it can simply outlast them.

Mark

So why does the Philippines keep sending supply boats if it knows China will harass them?

Mimi

Because if they stop, they lose the claim. The moment those soldiers leave the ship, China moves in. It's a stalemate held together by stubbornness and risk. Every resupply mission is an act of defiance.

Mark

What does the water cannon actually do?

Mimi

It's humiliation wrapped in physics. It doesn't sink the boat, but it damages equipment, it's dangerous, and it sends a message: we can hurt you whenever we want. It's aggression that stays just below the threshold of actual warfare.

Mark

Will this escalate?

Mimi

That's the real question. Both sides are locked in a pattern. China keeps pushing. The Philippines keeps pushing back. The U.S. is watching. At some point, someone miscalculates, and a water cannon becomes something worse.

  • A Chinese coast guard vessel fired water cannons at a smaller Philippine patrol boat and allegedly rammed a resupply ship called the Unaizah Mae 1, leaving another Philippine vessel with serious engine damage.
  • Both governments insist the other provoked the collision — Beijing says the Philippines ignored warnings and steered deliberately into a Chinese ship; Manila calls China's actions illegal aggression in a pattern of escalating intimidation.
  • The flashpoint is Second Thomas Shoal, where the Philippines has kept a deliberately grounded warship and a small garrison since 1999, running regular supply missions that China treats as trespassing in its claimed waters.
  • The U.S. ambassador to Manila publicly condemned China's conduct as destabilizing, signaling that the confrontation carries weight well beyond the two nations directly involved.
  • With a 2016 international arbitration ruling already dismissing China's sweeping territorial claims — a ruling Beijing ignores — no legal or diplomatic mechanism has yet broken the cycle of collision and counter-accusation.

In the contested waters of the South China Sea, Chinese and Philippine vessels collided near Second Thomas Shoal in December 2023, each nation placing the blame squarely on the other. The encounter — involving water cannons, ramming, and a damaged Philippine vessel — is not an isolated incident but a recurring chapter in a longer struggle over sovereignty, commerce, and the meaning of international law. At stake is not merely a submerged reef, but the question of who holds authority over waters that carry three trillion dollars in annual trade and the competing ambitions of an entire region.

Near Second Thomas Shoal, a submerged reef in the South China Sea claimed by multiple nations but occupied by the Philippines, Chinese and Philippine coast guard vessels collided in December 2023. Video released by Manila showed a Chinese ship deploying a water cannon against a smaller Philippine patrol boat. The Philippines also reported that Chinese vessels made direct contact with its resupply ships, including one called the Unaizah Mae 1, and that another vessel, the M/L Kalayaan, sustained serious engine damage. Manila characterized the actions as illegal aggression.

Beijing told a different story. Chinese authorities said the Philippine vessel had ignored repeated warnings before making a sudden, dangerous maneuver and deliberately ramming a Chinese coast guard ship. In China's framing, the water cannon was a routine enforcement measure, not an act of hostility.

The shoal has been a pressure point since 1999, when the Philippines intentionally grounded an aging warship on the reef and stationed sailors aboard it. China views the regular resupply missions to those troops as provocations within waters it claims as its own. The broader South China Sea dispute involves Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines — all holding competing claims over a body of water that carries more than three trillion dollars in annual maritime commerce.

A 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration found China's expansive claims had no basis in international law. Beijing has disregarded it. The U.S. ambassador to Manila weighed in publicly, calling China's conduct a threat to regional stability and the principle of a free and open Indo-Pacific. As long as the Philippines holds its position on the shoal and China refuses to recognize competing claims, these collisions — literal and diplomatic — are unlikely to stop.

On a stretch of shallow water in the South China Sea, two coast guard vessels collided. The confrontation unfolded near Second Thomas Shoal, a submerged reef positioned west of the Philippines and south of Hong Kong, in waters claimed by multiple nations but occupied by Manila. What happened in those moments—who rammed whom, who was at fault—depends entirely on which government you ask.

The Philippine Coast Guard released video footage showing a Chinese vessel deploying a water cannon against a much smaller Philippine patrol boat. The spray of high-pressure water struck the smaller vessel as it moved through the contested waters. According to Manila's account, Chinese ships also made direct contact with Philippine resupply vessels, including one called the Unaizah Mae 1. The Philippine Coast Guard characterized these actions as illegal and aggressive, part of what it described as a pattern of Chinese intimidation.

Beijing offered a different narrative. China's coast guard said the Philippine vessel had ignored repeated warnings and entered waters without permission. According to the Chinese account, the Unaizah Mae 1 made an abrupt and dangerous maneuver, deliberately ramming into a Chinese Coast Guard ship numbered 21556. In this telling, the Philippines bore full responsibility for the collision. China framed its use of the water cannon not as aggression but as a legitimate control measure—a standard tool in its maritime enforcement toolkit.

Second Thomas Shoal sits at the center of this dispute. The Philippines has maintained a presence there since 1999, when it deliberately ran an aging warship aground on the reef and left it there with a small contingent of sailors. That vessel remains, and the Philippines regularly sends supply missions to keep those troops provisioned. China views these resupply runs as provocations in waters it claims as its own. The shoal is part of the Spratly Islands, a collection of reefs and small landmasses scattered across the South China Sea that multiple nations contest.

The stakes extend far beyond this single reef. China claims nearly the entire South China Sea, viewing it as essential to its interests and security. The waters carry more than three trillion dollars in annual maritime commerce. Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and the Philippines all hold competing claims to parts of the sea. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled that China's expansive territorial claims had no legal foundation under international law. Beijing has largely disregarded that ruling.

What unfolds in these waters is a careful, dangerous choreography. The Philippines sends boats to resupply its soldiers. China sends its coast guard to obstruct, harass, and now, according to Manila, to ram. Each side accuses the other of provocation. Each side claims it is merely defending its legitimate interests. The Philippine Coast Guard reported that one of its vessels, the M/L Kalayaan, suffered serious engine damage in the encounter. The U.S. ambassador to Manila, MaryKay Carlson, weighed in on social media, characterizing China's actions as aggression that undermines regional stability and contradicts the principle of a free and open Indo-Pacific.

These confrontations have become routine. They are the visible manifestation of a deeper territorial contest that shows no sign of resolution. As long as the Philippines maintains its foothold on Second Thomas Shoal, and as long as China refuses to acknowledge the validity of competing claims, these moments of collision—literal and diplomatic—will likely recur. The question is not whether another incident will happen, but when.

China's actions amount to illegal and aggressive behavior that undermines regional stability
— Philippine Coast Guard and U.S. Ambassador MaryKay Carlson (paraphrased)
The Philippine vessel ignored warnings and deliberately rammed the Chinese Coast Guard ship; the Philippine side bears full responsibility
— China's coast guard (paraphrased)
Contact Us FAQ