Less than a year after aligning Africa's premier football tournament with a four-year global calendar, the Confederation of African Football finds itself reconsidering whether that alignment came at too great a cost to the continent's own sporting identity. CAF president Patrice Motsepe, speaking at a strategy conference in Cape Verde, signaled openness to restoring the Africa Cup of Nations to its traditional biennial rhythm — a quiet acknowledgment that decisions made in the name of global harmony can quietly erode local sovereignty. The episode raises an enduring question in world sport: wh
CAF may reverse four-year AFCON cycle, return to biennial format
We're going to fight on this issue when we have to
So CAF announced a major change—moving AFCON from every two years to every four years—and now, less than a year later, they're saying they might undo it. What actually changed?
The backlash was immediate and loud. When the tournament happened in Morocco in 2025, people were openly saying CAF had made the decision to please Europe, not Africa. Motsepe felt that pressure enough to signal they're reconsidering.
But did he actually commit to reversing it? He said they're "looking at everything, including" going back to biennial. That's not the same as announcing a reversal. We should be careful not to overstate what he said.
Fair point. So what was the original reasoning for the four-year cycle?
It was supposed to align AFCON with FIFA's international calendar and reduce the strain on host nations. Fewer tournaments means less disruption to club schedules, less infrastructure burden.
And the criticism is that this alignment primarily benefits European clubs and leagues, which have more leverage over player availability. African interests got secondary consideration.
Motsepe said it's "nonsense" that CAF takes orders from FIFA or UEFA. Do we have evidence they actually did?
Not explicit evidence. But the timing—announcing alignment with FIFA's calendar right after Infantino took heat—and the fact that European leagues benefit most from fewer African tournaments... it's suggestive.
It's suggestive, but we should name what we don't know. We don't have internal CAF communications showing FIFA pressure. We have criticism and inference. Motsepe's defensiveness is real, but defensiveness isn't proof of wrongdoing.
What about the 2027 tournament in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda? Is that actually happening?
Motsepe said yes, despite reports that construction is behind and some members want to move it. He was pretty emphatic about it.
He was emphatic, but those French media reports about construction delays—we haven't independently verified those either. We're taking Motsepe's word against unnamed reports. Both could be true, or one could be overstated.
Der Puls
- A decision made just last December — shifting AFCON from every two years to every four — has already generated enough backlash to force a public reconsideration by CAF's own president.
- Critics at the 2025 AFCON in Morocco argued loudly that the change served European scheduling interests rather than African football's natural rhythms, and that pressure appears to have landed.
- Motsepe pushed back hard against accusations of bowing to FIFA or UEFA, calling such claims 'absolute rubbish' — yet his own language on the schedule was notably open-ended rather than defensive.
- CAF is now actively reviewing a full return to biennial AFCON, though no formal reversal has been announced, leaving the confederation suspended between two calendars.
- Separately, Motsepe moved to quiet fears about the 2027 tournament in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda, dismissing reports of construction delays and insisting the three-nation host plan remains firmly on track.
Less than a year after aligning Africa's premier football tournament with a four-year global calendar, the Confederation of African Football finds itself reconsidering whether that alignment came at too great a cost to the continent's own sporting identity. CAF president Patrice Motsepe, speaking at a strategy conference in Cape Verde, signaled openness to restoring the Africa Cup of Nations to its traditional biennial rhythm — a quiet acknowledgment that decisions made in the name of global harmony can quietly erode local sovereignty. The episode raises an enduring question in world sport: who ultimately decides the pace at which a continent celebrates itself?
The Confederation of African Football is reconsidering one of its most significant recent decisions. Less than a year after announcing that the Africa Cup of Nations would move to a four-year cycle beginning in 2028 — aligning with FIFA's international match calendar — CAF president Patrice Motsepe signaled on Friday that the organization is actively reviewing whether to reverse course and restore the tournament's traditional two-year format.
Motsepe made the remarks on the final day of a three-day CAF strategy conference in Cape Verde. The four-year shift, announced last December, had been designed to ease the burden on host nations and synchronize with global football's scheduling architecture. But when AFCON was held in Morocco in 2025, the backlash was immediate and pointed — many officials and observers argued the change had been made to accommodate European interests rather than African football's own needs.
Motsepe rejected that framing forcefully. 'It is nonsense, absolute rubbish,' he said, that CAF had taken direction from FIFA or UEFA, reaffirming that his primary duty was to protect and advance African interests. Yet his words on the schedule itself were notably measured. 'We are looking at everything, including having the AFCON coming back every two years,' he said — leaving the door open to a full reversal without walking through it.
The conference also carried broader diplomatic weight. Motsepe had just reaffirmed CAF's support for FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who is facing mounting global criticism, and Infantino used the occasion to highlight FIFA's decade of investment in African football. The optics of appearing responsive to African concerns about AFCON's cadence may have served multiple purposes at once.
Motsepe also moved to address uncertainty surrounding the 2027 AFCON, set to be hosted across Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Reports of construction delays and quiet internal pressure to relocate the tournament were dismissed outright. 'You have to believe in Africa,' he said, invoking Nelson Mandela. 'There will be problems, there will be failures, fine, but we will be there.'
What remains unresolved is whether CAF will formally announce a return to biennial AFCON or seek some middle path. The decision made last December, once presented as settled, is no longer so.
The Confederation of African Football is reconsidering one of its most consequential recent decisions. Less than a year after announcing that the Africa Cup of Nations would shift from a biennial schedule to a four-year cycle beginning in 2028, CAF president Patrice Motsepe signaled on Friday that the organization is now actively reviewing whether to reverse course and return the tournament to its traditional two-year format.
Motsepe made the statement during the final day of CAF's three-day strategy conference in Cape Verde. The shift to a four-year calendar, announced last December, was designed to align African football's flagship competition with FIFA's international match schedule. But the decision generated immediate friction. When AFCON took place in Morocco in 2025, the backlash was palpable—many observers and officials argued that the change had been made to accommodate European interests rather than serve African football's own rhythms and needs.
The criticism clearly stung. Motsepe, a South African billionaire who also serves as a FIFA vice-president, pushed back forcefully against the suggestion that CAF had capitulated to external pressure. "It is nonsense, absolute rubbish," he said, that the confederation was taking orders from FIFA or UEFA. He reframed the organization's core mission in stark terms: "My No. 1 job, my No. 1 duty is to protect, promote, and advance the interests of Africa." He acknowledged that there are moments when CAF must stand firm and refuse demands from outside bodies.
Yet Motsepe's language about the AFCON schedule itself was notably softer. Rather than defending the four-year decision, he indicated that CAF had spent recent days reviewing the matter comprehensively. "We are looking at everything, including having the AFCON coming back every two years," he said. "We're very clear." The statement left the door open to a full reversal, though he stopped short of announcing one outright.
The timing of this recalibration matters. Motsepe was speaking at a conference where he had just reaffirmed CAF's unanimous support for FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who is facing significant criticism globally. Infantino used the occasion to remind African football leaders of the investments FIFA has directed toward the continent during his decade in office. The optics of appearing responsive to African concerns about AFCON's schedule may have served Motsepe's broader diplomatic interests at that moment.
Motsepe also used the conference to address another source of uncertainty: the 2027 Africa Cup of Nations, scheduled to take place across Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Recent reports from French media had suggested that construction projects were falling behind schedule and that some CAF members were quietly pushing to relocate the tournament. Motsepe dismissed these concerns and reaffirmed the tournament would proceed as planned. "You have to believe in Africa," he said. "There will be problems, there will be failures, fine, but we will be there. That's what Mandela taught us."
The question now is whether CAF will formally announce a return to biennial AFCON or whether the organization will settle on some middle ground. The four-year cycle was meant to reduce the burden on host nations and align with global football's calendar. A reversion to every two years would restore the tournament's traditional cadence but would require renegotiating those same logistical and scheduling concerns that prompted the change in the first place. What remains clear is that the decision made last December is no longer settled.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
My No. 1 job, my No. 1 duty is to protect, promote, and advance the interests of Africa.— Patrice Motsepe, CAF president
We are looking at everything, including having the AFCON coming back every two years. We're very clear.— Patrice Motsepe, CAF president