Business groups push Ottawa to finalize India trade deal after 12 years of stalled talks

India represents one of Canada's largest untapped trade opportunities
Business councils argue India's economy resembles where China stood two decades ago, making it strategically vital.
Mark

Why does this trade deal matter now, after twelve years of nothing?

Mimi

Because the geopolitical landscape shifted. Western countries are trying to build alternatives to China, and India is the world's fastest-growing major economy. Canada doesn't want to miss that window.

Luke

But India is only Canada's thirteenth-largest trading partner. How much economic impact are we actually talking about?

Mimi

The report estimates $8.8 billion in additional annual trade and a 0.25 percent GDP boost by 2035. That's meaningful but not transformative for Canada's overall economy.

Mark

What's holding up the deal if both sides want it?

Mimi

Historically, India has been protective of its markets. But they're opening up now—they're negotiating with the UK and EU too. The plan is to do a smaller early agreement first, then tackle the harder issues.

Luke

What are the harder issues they're avoiding?

Mimi

The report doesn't specify, but Dehejia hints at things like labor standards, environmental rules, intellectual property—the usual friction points in trade deals.

Mark

Is there a political angle here?

Mimi

Absolutely. Canada's Indian diaspora is concentrated in swing ridings like the Greater Toronto Area. A trade deal is a political win for Trudeau.

Luke

But there's the human rights problem. Modi's government has been criticized for surveillance, suppressing dissent, and refusing to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Mimi

Right. Trudeau tried to speak up for Indian farmers in 2020 and India accused him of interference. So now the thinking is to keep trade separate from values—let the deal stand on its own.

Luke

Can you actually separate those things, or is that just diplomatic theater?

Mimi

That's the real question. Dehejia says both governments need to compartmentalize, but it's unclear whether that's sustainable or just a way to avoid the conversation.

  • Twelve years of stalled negotiations have left billions in potential trade on the table, and Canadian exporters have been quietly losing market share even as bilateral trade grew.
  • Business councils released a commissioned report in August 2022 warning that inaction carries a real cost — a finalized deal could add $8.8 billion in annual trade and lift Canada's GDP by 0.25% by 2035.
  • Talks have quietly resumed: Minister Mary Ng traveled to India, monthly ministerial calls are now underway, and an interim 'early progress' agreement is expected within months.
  • Canada's Indo-Pacific strategy is reframing India as a strategic counterweight to China, but human rights concerns about Modi's government and India's refusal to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine complicate the path forward.
  • A shadow from Trudeau's troubled 2018 India visit still lingers, while Canada's large and politically influential Indian diaspora gives the government a domestic incentive to claim a trade win.

For more than a decade, a trade agreement between Canada and India has lingered just beyond reach — a promise deferred by politics, diplomatic friction, and competing priorities. Now, as the world reconfigures its economic alliances in the shadow of China's dominance, Canadian business councils are urging Ottawa to finally act on what analysts describe as one of the country's most significant untapped opportunities. The case is both strategic and human: India's trajectory echoes China's rise a generation ago, and the window, history suggests, does not stay open forever.

For twelve years, a trade agreement between Canada and India has existed mostly as an aspiration. Talks launched in 2010 under Stephen Harper produced nothing concrete, and the relationship drifted — cordial but underperforming. In early August 2022, the Business Council of Canada and the Canada India Business Council released a report making the case for urgency: India is the world's fastest-growing major economy, bilateral trade has expanded at nearly 12 percent annually for two decades, yet Canada has steadily lost ground. A comprehensive deal, the report argues, could add $8.8 billion in annual two-way trade and boost Canada's GDP by 0.25 percent by 2035.

The moment carries strategic weight beyond economics. Canada is preparing an Indo-Pacific strategy designed to expand its regional presence, and the very language of that framing — Indo-Pacific rather than Asia-Pacific — signals a deliberate effort to elevate India as a counterweight to China. Carleton University economist Vivek Dehejia notes that India's trajectory today resembles China's two decades ago, and that the opportunity is real but not permanent.

After years of stagnation, talks resumed in 2022. International Trade Minister Mary Ng visited India and met with her counterpart Piyush Goyal, and the two agreed to pursue a smaller interim agreement first — sidestepping the hardest issues while building toward a fuller deal. Monthly ministerial calls have followed, and a senior government official suggested an early progress agreement could arrive within months.

Complications remain. Prime Minister Modi's government has drawn sustained criticism from human rights organizations, and India's refusal to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine sits uneasily with Canadian foreign policy. A 2020 episode in which Trudeau expressed support for Indian farmers protesting government policy prompted New Delhi to accuse Ottawa of interference. Dehejia's counsel is pragmatic: successful negotiations will require both governments to compartmentalize trade from social policy — a separation that is easier to prescribe than to sustain.

For twelve years, a trade agreement between Canada and India has sat in negotiation limbo. Talks began in 2010 under Stephen Harper's Conservative government and have produced nothing concrete since. Now, as Western nations scramble to strengthen their economic footing in Asia and reduce dependence on China, Canadian business groups are pressing Ottawa to finally seal the deal.

In early August 2022, the Business Council of Canada and the Canada India Business Council released a report commissioned by economic analysts at Ciuriak Consulting. The document makes a straightforward case: India represents one of Canada's largest untapped trade opportunities, with an economy that resembles where China stood two decades ago. The numbers are compelling. While bilateral trade has grown at nearly 12 percent annually over twenty years, Canada has steadily lost market share. A comprehensive economic partnership agreement, the report argues, would reverse that trend—adding $8.8 billion in annual two-way trade and boosting Canada's GDP by 0.25 percent by 2035.

The timing is not accidental. After years of stagnation, Canada and India announced in early 2022 that negotiations were resuming. International Trade Minister Mary Ng traveled to India and met with her counterpart, Piyush Goyal. The two agreed to pursue an early progress trade agreement first—a smaller, interim deal that would sidestep the thorniest issues while both sides worked toward a full comprehensive agreement. Since that visit, the ministers have held monthly calls to advance the talks. According to a senior government official speaking anonymously, an early progress agreement is expected within months.

The push for a deal sits within a larger strategic shift. The federal government is preparing to release its Indo-Pacific strategy, designed to expand Canada's political and economic reach across the region. Vivek Dehejia, an economist at Carleton University who studies India's development, notes that the very term "Indo-Pacific"—replacing the older "Asia-Pacific"—reflects Western efforts to elevate India's profile as a counterweight to China. From a purely economic standpoint, India's status as the world's fastest-growing major economy makes it an obvious target. Yet the relationship remains modest in scale. In 2021, India ranked as Canada's thirteenth-largest trading partner.

Dehejia identifies a more potent force driving the relationship: Canada's Indian diaspora, concentrated in cities like Toronto, which he describes as swing voters with political weight. That demographic reality gives Prime Minister Justin Trudeau an incentive to claim a trade victory. It also explains why the 2018 visit to India—marred by Trudeau's family wearing traditional Indian clothing and the controversial invitation of a convicted attempted murderer to official events—still casts a shadow.

India itself has begun opening to trade negotiations after years of resistance. The country is pursuing agreements with the United Kingdom, expected this fall, and has revived talks with the European Union. Dehejia suggests India has recognized that trade cannot remain sidelined. Yet complications loom. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has faced sustained criticism for human rights abuses, including surveillance of critics, politically motivated prosecutions, and suppression of activist groups, according to Human Rights Watch. India has also refused to condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, citing historical ties to Moscow and dependence on Russian weapons.

Canada's own record on this front complicates matters. In 2020, Trudeau voiced support for Indian farmers protesting government policies, prompting New Delhi to accuse Canada of interference. Dehejia advises that successful negotiations require compartmentalizing trade from social policy—allowing both governments to frame an agreement as a sign of improving relations rather than a capitulation on values. Whether that separation can hold remains an open question as the two nations edge toward a deal.

The best path forward is a comprehensive economic partnership agreement with India, which would increase two-way trade by $8.8 billion a year and bring about an annual GDP boost of 0.25 per cent by 2035.
— Business Council of Canada and Canada India Business Council report
The real driver of the relationship between Canada and India is no longer the economy—it really is diaspora-driven, particularly among swing voters in metropolitan regions like the Greater Toronto Area.
— Vivek Dehejia, economist at Carleton University
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em GuelphToday ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ