A large British study tracking nearly 124,000 people over a decade has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions — that choosing diet over regular soda is a meaningful act of self-care. Both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages were found to substantially raise the risk of a serious liver condition, with diet drinks carrying an additional shadow: a measurable link to liver-related death. In a world where 30 percent of people already live with fatty liver disease, the findings invite a deeper reckoning with what we reach for when we reach for some
Both sugary and diet drinks linked to 50-60% higher liver disease risk
Water remains the best choice as it removes the metabolic burden
So both regular soda and diet soda increase liver disease risk by roughly the same amount—50 to 60 percent. That's the headline, right?
That's the finding, yes. But what makes it notable is that people have been told for years that diet drinks are the safer option. This study suggests that's not true, at least when it comes to the liver.
How confident are we in that 50-to-60-percent number? Is that from a single measurement of what people drank, or repeated measurements?
Repeated measurements—24-hour dietary questionnaires done multiple times over the study period. That's stronger than a one-time survey.
And the study followed people for how long?
A median of 10.3 years. Over that time, 1,178 people developed the disease and 108 died from liver-related causes.
That's a real outcome—actual deaths, not just a risk score. But I want to know: did they control for other factors? People who drink a lot of soda might also be overweight, or have poor diets overall.
The study was designed to examine the association between beverage intake and liver disease risk, but the source material doesn't detail what other variables they adjusted for. That's a fair question.
What about the mechanism? Why would diet drinks be worse than regular soda?
The researchers propose that artificial sweeteners might alter gut bacteria, disrupt fullness signals, and even trigger insulin release. Regular soda does its damage through blood sugar spikes and weight gain. Different paths to the same problem.
Those are hypotheses, though. The study shows correlation, not causation. They're planning genetic and microbiome studies to test whether those mechanisms actually hold up.
And the one thing that clearly worked?
Water. Switching to water reduced risk by 12 to 15 percent. Switching from one type of soda to the other did nothing.
Der Puls
- A decade-long study of 123,788 people found that both regular and diet sodas raise the risk of metabolic liver disease by 50–60%, shattering the widely held belief that artificial sweeteners offer a safe escape from sugar's harms.
- Diet drinks emerged as the more troubling option in one critical respect — they were linked to liver-related mortality in ways that regular sugary beverages were not, adding urgency to findings that researchers call unexpected.
- The two drink types appear to damage the liver through entirely different pathways — sugar spikes insulin and promotes fat accumulation, while artificial sweeteners may quietly reshape gut bacteria and distort the body's hunger signals.
- Over the study period, 1,178 participants developed liver disease and 108 died from liver-related causes, giving statistical weight to what might otherwise seem like abstract dietary risk.
- The one clear protective move the data revealed was straightforward: replacing either type of drink with water reduced liver disease risk by 12–15%, while swapping one soda for the other offered no protection at all.
- Researchers are now turning toward genetic and microbiome studies to understand the mechanisms at work, as the condition they studied — once called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease — has become the world's most common chronic liver disease.
A large British study tracking nearly 124,000 people over a decade has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions — that choosing diet over regular soda is a meaningful act of self-care. Both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages were found to substantially raise the risk of a serious liver condition, with diet drinks carrying an additional shadow: a measurable link to liver-related death. In a world where 30 percent of people already live with fatty liver disease, the findings invite a deeper reckoning with what we reach for when we reach for something sweet.
A study presented at UEG Week 2025 has challenged one of the most persistent assumptions in everyday health thinking: that diet soda is a reasonable substitute for the sugary kind. Tracking nearly 124,000 participants from the UK Biobank over more than a decade, researchers found that both types of beverages significantly raise the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease — a condition in which fat accumulates in the liver and can progress to inflammation, organ failure, and death.
The numbers were striking. Consuming more than 250 grams of sugar-sweetened drinks daily — roughly a can and a half — raised MASLD risk by 50 percent. The same quantity of artificially sweetened drinks raised it by 60 percent. More troubling still, diet drinks were uniquely associated with liver-related mortality, a link that did not appear for regular sodas. Over the study period, 1,178 participants developed the disease and 108 died from liver-related causes.
Lead author Lihe Liu noted that the two drink types likely harm the liver through different mechanisms. Sugary beverages drive rapid spikes in blood glucose and insulin, promote weight gain, and elevate uric acid — all roads that lead to fat buildup in the liver. Artificially sweetened drinks may work more subtly, potentially altering gut bacteria, blunting the body's sense of fullness, amplifying cravings, and triggering insulin responses despite containing no sugar.
The study's most actionable finding was also its simplest: water works. Replacing sugary drinks with water reduced MASLD risk by nearly 13 percent; replacing diet drinks with water cut risk by over 15 percent. Swapping one soda for the other, however, offered no benefit at all. 'The safest approach is to limit both,' Liu said, describing water as the only beverage that removes the metabolic burden entirely.
The findings land at a moment when MASLD — formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease — affects an estimated 30 percent of people worldwide and is a rapidly growing cause of liver failure. Researchers plan to pursue randomized trials and genetic studies focused on how sugar and its substitutes interact with the gut microbiome, hoping to understand not just what is happening in the liver, but why.
A study of nearly 124,000 people in the UK has upended a common assumption about diet drinks: that swapping regular soda for artificially sweetened alternatives is a smarter choice for your health. Researchers found that both types of beverages—sugary and sugar-free alike—carry roughly the same risk of developing a serious liver condition, and in some cases, the diet versions posed an even graver threat.
The work, presented at UEG Week 2025, tracked 123,788 participants from the UK Biobank who had no liver disease when the study began. Over a median follow-up of 10.3 years, researchers used repeated 24-hour dietary questionnaires to measure what people drank, then watched to see who developed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, or MASLD—a condition in which fat builds up inside the liver. The numbers were sobering: 1,178 participants developed the disease during the study period, and 108 died from liver-related causes.
When people consumed more than 250 grams of sugar-sweetened beverages daily—roughly a can and a half of soda—their risk of developing MASLD climbed by 50 percent. Those drinking the same amount of artificially sweetened drinks faced a 60 percent increase in risk. What made the diet drinks particularly concerning was their association with liver-related death. No such link emerged for regular sugary drinks. Both types of beverages were also tied to higher fat content in the liver itself.
Lihe Liu, the study's lead author, noted that the findings challenge a widespread belief. "SSBs have long been under scrutiny, while their 'diet' alternatives are often seen as the healthier choice," Liu said. "Both, however, are widely consumed and their effects on liver health have not been well understood." The research suggests that even modest consumption of artificially sweetened drinks—as little as one can per day—carried measurable risk.
The mechanisms behind these dangers appear to differ between the two beverage types. Regular sodas spike blood glucose and insulin levels rapidly, promote weight gain, and increase uric acid—all pathways that lead to fat accumulation in the liver. Artificially sweetened drinks may work differently, potentially by reshaping the bacteria in the gut, disrupting the body's sense of fullness, intensifying cravings for sweet foods, and even triggering insulin release despite containing no sugar.
The study offered one clear protective measure: replacing either type of drink with water. Switching from sugary beverages to water reduced MASLD risk by 12.8 percent; switching from diet drinks to water cut risk by 15.2 percent. Notably, replacing one type of soda with the other offered no protection at all. "The safest approach is to limit both sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened drinks," Liu said. "Water remains the best choice as it removes the metabolic burden and prevents fat accumulation in the liver while hydrating the body."
The findings arrive as MASLD has become a global health crisis. Once known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the condition now affects an estimated 30 percent of people worldwide and represents the most common chronic liver disease. Over time, fat in the liver triggers inflammation, leading to pain, fatigue, and loss of appetite. The disease is also a rapidly rising cause of death from liver failure. Researchers say their work supports a comprehensive rethinking of beverage consumption as part of broader efforts to protect not just liver health but also heart and kidney function. The team plans to pursue deeper investigation through randomized trials and genetic studies, focusing on how sugar and its substitutes interact with the gut microbiome to influence disease development.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Both sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened drinks are widely consumed and their effects on liver health have not been well understood.— Lihe Liu, lead author
The safest approach is to limit both sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened drinks. Water remains the best choice.— Lihe Liu