Blood tests reveal dangerously high cancer-causing chemical levels in Lancashire factory residents

Residents face elevated health risks including cancer, thyroid dysfunction, and kidney disease; families experiencing psychological distress and property devaluation; pregnant women and children particularly vulnerable.
Something seriously wrong has happened to that community
A university researcher's reaction to blood test results showing PFOA levels far exceeding general population norms.
Mark

So these are people who've been living near this factory for years, and they only just found out their blood levels were this high?

Mimi

Right. The factory stopped using PFOA in 2012, but the chemical doesn't break down. The Environment Agency investigation started in 2024, and residents kept asking for blood tests. The health authority said tests wouldn't be useful, so independent testing was funded by journalists and an environmental law group.

Luke

But we should be clear: the UK Health Security Agency said PFAS monitoring isn't currently recommended because tests are unlikely to provide clear information for individuals. That's their official position. The independent tests were done outside that framework.

Mark

What does "off the scale" actually mean in practical terms?

Mimi

Seventy percent of the forty-nine people tested exceeded the safety guidelines that the US and Germany use. So we're talking about levels that those countries would flag as requiring further screening.

Luke

Though it's worth noting the UK doesn't have its own guidelines. We're using other countries' thresholds. And elevated risk doesn't mean certain harm—Dr. Hajioff said if you increase the risk of a rare disease by thirty percent, the actual chance an individual gets it is still pretty low.

Mark

What about the children?

Mimi

One woman talked about breastfeeding her children and passing the chemical to them. Another resident said he now has to keep his children out of his own garden. There's real distress there.

Luke

The source material doesn't give us numbers on how many children were tested or what their specific levels were, beyond one parent's description of her son's result as "ridiculously off the scale." We know the chemical can affect thyroid function and other things, but we don't have data on actual health outcomes in this community yet.

Mark

Is the factory responsible?

Mimi

The investigation concluded PFOA likely came from the factory, carried in the air. The factory used it until 2012. But AGC Chemicals says the site was manufacturing chemicals long before they took over, and they're not speculating on outcomes while the investigation is ongoing.

Luke

The legal case would be the first of its kind in the UK for forever chemical contamination. There's precedent in the US—DuPont and Chemours settled for over six hundred million dollars—but that's a different context. We don't know yet what a UK court would find or award.

Mark

What happens now?

Mimi

Over a hundred residents are considering group legal action. The factory is closing later this year. Researchers want more blood testing in the wider community.

Luke

The council said it will press for updated guidance from health agencies. But there's no treatment protocol in place yet in the UK. Jersey recommended cholesterol medications and blood letting for elevated cases, but that's not standard here.

  • Blood tests reveal that nearly three in four residents tested near a Lancashire chemical factory carry PFOA levels high enough to trigger mandatory health screening in other countries — yet the UK has no official threshold at all.
  • The contamination is not abstract: one mother described the anguish of realising she may have passed the chemical to her children through breastfeeding, while another resident feels unable to let his children play in his own garden.
  • The factory at the centre of the crisis — which used PFOA in non-stick coatings until 2012 — has announced it will close later this year, leaving residents with elevated health risks, devalued properties, and no clear path to remediation.
  • Over one hundred residents are now pursuing what lawyers describe as a potentially groundbreaking UK legal action against AGC Chemicals, seeking damages for health risk, property loss, and the loss of ordinary life on their own land.
  • Researchers and public health advocates warn that Thornton-Cleveleys may be only the most visible case in a far wider national problem, calling for expanded blood testing and urging authorities to establish formal guidance that currently does not exist.

In the Lancashire village of Thornton-Cleveleys, forty-nine residents have learned that their blood carries a banned, cancer-linked chemical called PFOA — a substance so persistent it has earned the name 'forever chemical' — traced to decades of industrial activity at a nearby factory. The results, gathered not by official health authorities but by university researchers funded through investigative journalism, reveal that seventy percent of those tested exceed safety thresholds used in the United States and Germany. This is a story about what accumulates quietly in bodies and communities when industrial convenience outpaces accountability — and about a village now asking who is responsible for what cannot be undone.

On a Wednesday afternoon in Thornton-Cleveleys, forty-nine Lancashire residents opened blood test results that told them something their local authorities had not: their bodies contained dangerous levels of PFOA, a forever chemical banned in the UK since 2020 and classified by the World Health Organisation as a definitive human carcinogen. The tests were not commissioned by the government. They were funded by investigative journalists and an environmental law organisation, conducted by Manchester Metropolitan University — because residents who had been asking for answers for years had stopped waiting.

The contamination leads back to a factory that has stood near the village since the 1950s, first under ICI and then under AGC Chemicals, which used PFOA to manufacture non-stick coatings until 2012. Investigations begun in 2024 found the chemical in local soil, eggs, and homegrown vegetables, most likely carried through the air from the site. Two allotments were closed. Residents within a kilometre were told to peel anything they grew at home.

Seventy percent of those tested exceeded the safety guidelines applied in the United States and Germany — thresholds that trigger recommendations for further health screening. The associated risks include thyroid dysfunction, kidney and testicular cancer, elevated cholesterol, and pre-eclampsia. The UK, unlike those countries, has no official guidance on acceptable PFAS levels in blood, leaving residents with alarming numbers and nowhere official to take them.

For those who received results, the clinical data carried a deeply personal weight. One mother was shaken by how far her son's levels exceeded normal ranges, and spoke of guilt over breastfeeding. A man whose home was built on former factory land had expected to be unaffected; he now plans to ask his GP simply to record the result. Another resident, among the highest readings, described feeling trapped — unable to let his children use their own garden. The scientist who ran the tests said the results made him feel sick.

More than one hundred residents are now considering a collective legal claim against AGC Chemicals — what their lawyers call a potentially groundbreaking case, the first of its kind in the UK over forever chemical contamination. AGC, which announced the factory's closure this month citing market conditions, said the site had a long history before their ownership and that no formal determination of land contamination had yet been made. The factory is expected to close before the year is out.

Public health specialists note that PFOA levels were likely even higher in the past, given the chemical has been slowly breaking down since the factory stopped using it in 2012. They caution that elevated risk does not mean certain illness — but they also acknowledge that for the families of Thornton-Cleveleys, that distinction offers limited comfort. Lawyers and researchers alike warn that this village may not be an exception. It may be the first place the country has looked closely enough to see what has long been there.

In Thornton-Cleveleys, a village in Lancashire, forty-nine residents opened their blood test results on a Wednesday afternoon and learned they were carrying dangerous levels of a chemical that does not break down in the body. The substance, PFOA, is a forever chemical—so named because it resists degradation in water and oil alike. It has been banned in the UK since 2020, classified by the World Health Organisation as a Group 1 carcinogen, meaning there is clear scientific evidence it increases cancer risk. The tests were conducted by Manchester Metropolitan University, funded by investigative journalists and an environmental law organization, after residents had repeatedly asked local authorities to check their blood.

The source of the contamination traces back to a chemical factory that has operated near the village since the 1950s. When ICI first ran the site, it manufactured non-stick coatings for frying pans using PFOA. AGC Chemicals took over in 1999 and continued the practice until 2012, when the company switched to a replacement chemical called EEA-NH4. An investigation by the Environment Agency and Wyre Council, which began in 2024, found PFOA at elevated levels in soil, eggs, and locally grown vegetables. The chemical had likely traveled through the air from the factory. Two allotment sites were closed and designated as contaminated land. Residents within one kilometer of the factory were advised to peel any fruit or vegetables they grew at home.

Of the forty-nine people tested, seventy percent had blood readings that exceeded the safety guidelines used in the United States and Germany. The possible health effects associated with elevated PFOA exposure include reduced thyroid function, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, elevated cholesterol, pre-eclampsia, and ulcerative colitis. Having high levels does not guarantee someone will develop these conditions, but US and German authorities recommend that people with elevated readings receive further health screening. The UK has no official recommendations about acceptable PFAS levels in blood.

For the residents who received their results, the news carried a weight beyond the clinical. One woman described opening her son's test results and being shocked by how far "off the scale" they were. She spoke of the guilt of having breastfed her children, knowing she may have passed the chemical to them. Andrew Molloy, whose home was built on land that once belonged to the factory, said he had expected normal results since he did not eat food grown in his garden. He planned to take his results to his GP to at least have them recorded. Mario Panteli, whose readings were among the highest, said the results were "quite emotional, a shock." He described feeling confined, unable to let his children play in his own garden, front and back. Dr David Megson, who conducted the testing, said the results made him feel sick. "To me, it shows something seriously wrong has happened to that community," he said, noting the levels were far higher than anything expected in the general population.

More than one hundred residents are now considering a group legal action against AGC Chemicals to claim damages. Sarah Moore, a partner at the law firm representing some residents, said compensation could be sought for financial losses on property values and the impact on residents' ability to use and enjoy their land. Damages could also be sought for health risks. She called the potential case "groundbreaking in the UK"—the first time a community has brought a legal claim over forever chemical contamination in the country. The largest comparable case occurred in West Virginia, where DuPont and Chemours settled more than thirty-five hundred PFOA lawsuits for six hundred seventy-one million dollars. Both companies denied wrongdoing.

AGC Chemicals announced earlier this month that the factory would close later this year, citing a volatile and competitive market with no viable solution to keep operations running. A company spokesperson said the site had manufactured chemicals long before AGC took over, and that since the wider investigation was still ongoing with no formal determination of land contamination yet made, they could not speculate on future outcomes. Dr Steve Hajioff, a public health specialist not involved in the testing, noted that PFOA levels could have been even higher in the past, given that the factory stopped using the substance in 2012 and the chemical does break down over time, albeit slowly. He cautioned that while the measured levels are associated with elevated risks of serious health conditions, increasing the risk of rare diseases like kidney cancer by thirty percent still means the chances of an individual being affected remain relatively low.

Moore expressed concern about pregnant women and families in the community, including those whose relatives were refusing to visit their homes over contamination worries. She warned that what is happening in Thornton-Cleveleys might be seen as an outlier but could be "the tip of the iceberg." Researchers recommended that further blood testing be conducted in the wider community to understand the full scale of the issue. A previous report into PFAS contamination in Jersey suggested that residents with elevated levels should be offered treatment, including cholesterol-lowering medications and blood letting, a procedure in which blood is gradually withdrawn to allow the body to naturally replenish it. Wyre Borough Council said it would continue to press for updated advice and guidance from health agencies as evidence emerges.

I feel guilty because I've introduced my children to that way of life. Knowing that I've offloaded what levels I probably had over the years into those children when I breastfed them—that's heartbreaking.
— A resident from Thornton-Cleveleys
To me, it shows something seriously wrong has happened to that community in that area, that the levels were far higher than anything we would have ever expected to see in the general population.
— Dr David Megson, Manchester Metropolitan University
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ