At a Toronto cancer centre, researchers are asking whether a vial of blood might one day quiet the deepest fear a cancer survivor carries — the fear that the illness never truly left. The SHERLOCK trial, enrolling 7,000 patients at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, is testing liquid biopsy technology capable of detecting tumour DNA fragments too small for conventional imaging to find, potentially allowing doctors to intervene before recurrence becomes visible or to offer patients the rare gift of genuine certainty. It is a methodical, years-long undertaking, grounded in the understanding that m
Blood test could detect cancer recurrence before CT scans, Toronto researchers find
Most patients, even after curative treatment, carry fear in their eyes
Why does a blood test matter more than the CT scans doctors already use?
Because CT scans can only see tumours that have grown to a certain size. A blood test can detect cancer DNA in amounts so small the tumour hasn't formed yet—sometimes years before it would show up on imaging.
So if the blood test finds cancer DNA, the patient definitely has cancer coming back?
Not necessarily. The research shows that people with positive tests have a very high chance of recurrence, but it's not a certainty. That's why they're offering experimental immunotherapy—to try to stop it before it becomes a full tumour.
And if the test is negative?
That's where the psychological relief comes in. A negative test could mean the cancer is truly gone, and doctors could stop giving patients more chemotherapy or radiation. Those treatments have serious side effects, and if you don't need them, you shouldn't have them.
Why does it take five years to know if this works?
Because you need to follow patients long enough to see whether the blood test actually predicted who got cancer back and who didn't. One year isn't enough time. Cancer can recur years later.
Is this ready to use in hospitals now?
Not yet. It's still experimental. The SHERLOCK trial is trying to build the evidence needed to make it standard practice, but there's more work to do first.
What makes Paul Lonergan's story significant?
He's proof that the concept works. He had cancer DNA in his blood after treatment, got an experimental drug, and three years later he's still cancer-free. But one success story isn't enough—that's why they need 7,000 patients in the trial.
Le Pouls
- Cancer survivors face a relentless psychological cycle — scans come back clear, relief arrives, then dread quietly rebuilds before the next appointment.
- Standard CT scans cannot detect the microscopic tumour DNA that may still circulate in a patient's blood after treatment ends, leaving a dangerous blind spot in post-treatment care.
- The SHERLOCK trial is enrolling 7,000 patients to determine whether liquid biopsies can reliably identify this molecular residual disease across multiple cancer types and populations.
- A positive result could unlock preventive immunotherapy before any tumour becomes visible; a negative result could spare patients from unnecessary chemotherapy or radiation and their serious side effects.
- Researchers and outside experts caution that this remains an observational study — promising, but years of follow-up data are still required before liquid biopsies can enter routine clinical practice.
At a Toronto cancer centre, researchers are asking whether a vial of blood might one day quiet the deepest fear a cancer survivor carries — the fear that the illness never truly left. The SHERLOCK trial, enrolling 7,000 patients at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, is testing liquid biopsy technology capable of detecting tumour DNA fragments too small for conventional imaging to find, potentially allowing doctors to intervene before recurrence becomes visible or to offer patients the rare gift of genuine certainty. It is a methodical, years-long undertaking, grounded in the understanding that medicine must earn its promises before it can keep them.
At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Dr. Lillian Siu and her team are running a trial called SHERLOCK, enrolling 7,000 patients who have completed cancer treatment. They are searching for something CT scans cannot see: fragments of tumour DNA circulating in the bloodstream in quantities so small they are invisible to standard imaging. This approach — known as a liquid biopsy — has shown promise in smaller studies, but SHERLOCK is designed to provide the large-scale validation needed to prove it works across different cancer types and patient populations.
The stakes are significant in both directions. If the blood test detects these microscopic remnants — what researchers call molecular residual disease — patients could receive experimental immunotherapy designed to prevent recurrence before any tumour appears on a scan. If the test returns negative, it could offer something equally powerful: genuine confirmation that the cancer is gone, sparing patients from additional rounds of chemotherapy or radiation. Siu is clear that the trial must follow patients for at least five years before meaningful conclusions can be drawn.
The psychological dimension of this work is not abstract. Siu has watched the fear in her patients' eyes at follow-up appointments, a cycle of temporary relief and returning dread that persists even after successful treatment. A reliable blood test could interrupt that cycle in ways that scans alone cannot.
One patient, 68-year-old Paul Lonergan, has already lived a version of this story. Diagnosed with throat cancer three years ago after symptoms were initially dismissed, he was enrolled in a related trial after treatment and told that while his tumour was gone, cancer fragments remained in his blood. He received immunotherapy, and it worked. He still relies on smoothies rather than solid food, but he has returned to playing hockey — not to compete, he says, but simply for the joy of being on the ice.
The SHERLOCK trial is backed by a $50-million donation from the Peter Gilgan Foundation. Researchers elsewhere, including liquid biopsy specialists at the University of British Columbia, have welcomed its broad scope while echoing Siu's caution: this is observational science, not yet a clinical standard. The evidence must be built carefully, and the field will need to see the results before this becomes a routine part of cancer follow-up care.
At Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, researchers are testing whether a simple blood draw could answer one of the most haunting questions a cancer survivor faces: Is it really gone?
Dr. Lillian Siu and her team are running a trial called SHERLOCK, enrolling 7,000 patients who have finished their radiation, chemotherapy, or other cancer treatments. The researchers are looking for something invisible to standard imaging—fragments of tumour DNA circulating in the bloodstream in quantities so small that CT scans cannot detect them. This approach, known as a liquid biopsy, has shown promise in smaller studies around the world, but Siu's team is conducting the large-scale validation needed to prove it works across different cancer types and patient populations.
The logic is straightforward but powerful. If a blood test finds these microscopic remnants of cancer—a condition researchers call molecular residual disease—patients could receive experimental immunotherapies designed to prevent recurrence before any tumour becomes visible on imaging. If the test comes back negative, it could offer something equally valuable: confirmation that the cancer is truly gone, allowing doctors to spare patients from additional rounds of chemotherapy or radiation that carry their own serious side effects. Siu emphasizes that the trial will follow patients for at least five years. "You need to have the long-term followup to know whether the test is actually predicting longer-term outcome(s)," she said. "Just stopping at one year is not going to be sufficient."
The psychological weight of cancer recurrence anxiety is real and persistent. Siu has watched it play out in her clinic countless times. Patients arrive for follow-up appointments carrying visible fear. When their scans come back clear, there is relief—but temporary. The anxiety returns at the next appointment, and the cycle repeats. "Most patients, even after curative treatment, whenever they come back to the clinic for a followup, I can see that they have fear in their eyes," Siu said. Many wonder when they will finally be free from the constant dread that their cancer will return.
The SHERLOCK trial has already attracted attention from researchers studying liquid biopsies in other countries. Gillian Vandekerkhove, an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia who studies bladder cancer and liquid biopsies, welcomed the trial's broad scope across multiple cancer types. "They're going to provide a wealth of information and biobank samples that researchers can continue to explore," she said. But Vandekerkhove also sounded a note of caution. This is an observational study designed to help researchers understand the technology and identify its best applications, not a definitive proof that it should move into routine clinical practice. Additional trials will be needed before that happens.
Paul Lonergan, a 68-year-old Toronto man, has already experienced the potential benefit firsthand. Three years ago, he was diagnosed with throat cancer after initially being told by his family physician that he had a virus. The symptoms escalated—he began coughing up blood while playing hockey, his lifelong passion. After treatment at Princess Margaret with radiation and chemotherapy, Lonergan was enrolled in a different trial called MERIDIAN, which tested for residual cancer DNA in head and neck cancer patients. The results changed his trajectory. "The doctor said, 'I've got good news and a little bit of bad news. The tumour's gone. There's fragments of cancer in your blood, which is the bad news, but we have a trial drug that can probably help you,'" he recalled. He received several months of immunotherapy treatment. "Sure as heck it worked," he said. After three consecutive six-month checkups, his doctors cleared him. He still struggles with swallowing and relies on smoothies rather than solid food, but he has returned to the ice. "I don't care now about being one of the better players or not. I just go out and have fun and exercise and it's just good to be out and doing that."
The SHERLOCK trial is funded by a $50-million donation from the Peter Gilgan Foundation and represents a significant institutional commitment to validating this technology. But Siu is careful to manage expectations. Blood tests for predicting cancer recurrence are not yet standard of care. The research is promising, but the evidence must be built methodically. The trial will take years to complete, and the field will need to see the results before this becomes a routine tool in cancer follow-up care.
Citations marquantes
Most patients, even after curative treatment, whenever they come back to the clinic for a followup, I can see that they have fear in their eyes.— Dr. Lillian Siu, lead investigator at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Sure as heck it worked. I've done three six-month checkups and I just finished my third one and they said I'm good.— Paul Lonergan, throat cancer survivor enrolled in MERIDIAN trial