In a striking reversal of months-long policy, the United States — Israel's most steadfast defender in international forums — submitted a UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, even as Secretary of State Blinken flew to Tel Aviv for a direct and unusually tense meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu. The shift signals that Washington's patience with the conduct of the war has reached a threshold, and that the bonds of alliance, while not broken, are under visible strain. At stake is not only the fate of hostages and a ceasefire, but the deeper question of how
Blinken presses Netanyahu on Gaza ceasefire as US tables UN resolution
Gaza's only partially functioning northern medical facility under sustained attack for four days, threatening civilian healthcare access.
A mistake and unnecessary to defeating Hamas
Mark
So the US is now submitting a ceasefire resolution after spending months blocking the same thing. What changed?
Mimi
The pressure became unsustainable. The humanitarian toll in Gaza kept mounting, and the Biden administration decided the cost of defending Israel's every move was too high politically and diplomatically.
Luke
But we should be careful here—we don't know what negotiations happened behind closed doors. The resolution could be worded differently, or there could be conditions attached that make it more palatable to Israel. The headline makes it sound like a complete reversal, but it might be more tactical than that.
Mark
Fair point. So Blinken is going to tell Netanyahu what, exactly?
Mimi
That a Rafah assault is a mistake. That the US wants a ceasefire tied to hostage releases. That the relationship is strained and something has to give.
Luke
And Netanyahu will say what he's been saying—that Hamas is using civilians as shields, that the operation is necessary, that international pressure is interference. We don't actually know if Blinken can move him.
Mark
What about the hospital?
Mimi
It's the last major medical facility in northern Gaza. If it falls, there's essentially no healthcare infrastructure left in that part of the enclave.
Luke
Israel claims Hamas is there. Hamas denies it. We have reports of tanks and gunfire, but we don't have independent verification of who's actually inside the building or what's happening room by room. That's the fog of war—and it's where the real disagreement lives.
Mark
So this whole thing hinges on whether the US can actually persuade Netanyahu?
Mimi
Yes. And on whether the ceasefire resolution has any teeth, or whether it's just a symbolic gesture.
Luke
And whether Qatar and the mediators can actually broker something. Blinken and Barnea both moving at the same time suggests coordination, but coordination doesn't guarantee success.
El Pulso
- The US has reversed months of vetoing ceasefire resolutions, now drafting and submitting one itself — a diplomatic about-face that reframes America's role from Israel's shield to a voice of restraint.
- Al-Shifa hospital, the last partially functioning medical facility in northern Gaza, has been under sustained Israeli assault for four days, with tanks, gunfire, and flames reported — its survival hanging on disputed claims about Hamas's presence inside.
- Blinken warned in Cairo that a major Israeli ground offensive on Rafah — where hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians are sheltered — would be 'a mistake,' marking one of the sharpest public rebukes Washington has issued to Jerusalem since the war began.
- Israel's spy chief simultaneously traveled to Qatar for back-channel mediation talks, suggesting a dual-track pressure campaign aimed at unlocking a hostage deal and a pause in fighting.
- The outcome of Blinken's sixth Middle East visit since October may determine whether the US-Israel relationship bends under the weight of disagreement — or breaks.
In a striking reversal of months-long policy, the United States — Israel's most steadfast defender in international forums — submitted a UN Security Council resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, even as Secretary of State Blinken flew to Tel Aviv for a direct and unusually tense meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu. The shift signals that Washington's patience with the conduct of the war has reached a threshold, and that the bonds of alliance, while not broken, are under visible strain. At stake is not only the fate of hostages and a ceasefire, but the deeper question of how far a patron nation will go before it redirects the hand it has long shielded.
Antony Blinken arrived in Israel carrying a message Washington had never quite delivered in this form: the United States was tabling a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. For months, the US had used its veto to shield Israel from exactly this kind of international pressure. Now it was the one applying it.
The visit — Blinken's sixth urgent trip to the region since October — came as tensions between the Biden administration and Prime Minister Netanyahu had grown openly strained. A day earlier in Cairo, Blinken had called a threatened Israeli ground assault on Rafah a 'mistake,' warning it was unnecessary to defeating Hamas and would cause enormous harm to the hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians sheltering there.
While Blinken pressed Netanyahu directly, Israel's spy chief David Barnea traveled to Qatar for back-channel ceasefire mediation — a parallel track suggesting a coordinated push to break the deadlock over hostages and a pause in fighting.
Meanwhile, the war's human cost was crystallizing at al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City — the only partially functioning medical facility left in the north. Under sustained Israeli assault for four days, with tanks and gunfire reported outside its walls, the hospital's fate embodied the central dispute: Israel maintained it was a legitimate military target harboring Hamas fighters; Hamas denied it. The difference between those two claims was the difference between a military operation and the destruction of the last healthcare infrastructure serving northern Gaza's civilians.
What emerged from Blinken's talks with Netanyahu would likely shape not just the immediate conflict, but the trajectory of one of America's most consequential alliances.
Antony Blinken was on his way to Israel on Friday with a message the Israeli government had not expected to hear from Washington in quite this form: the United States, Israel's closest ally and most consistent defender in international forums, was about to table a UN Security Council resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The move marked a sharp reversal. For months, the US had wielded its veto power to block similar resolutions, protecting Israel from international pressure. Now it was submitting one itself.
The timing was deliberate and pointed. Blinken's visit—his sixth urgent trip to the Middle East since the war began in October—came as tensions between the Biden administration and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had grown visibly strained. In Cairo the day before, Blinken had been blunt about one particular concern: a major Israeli ground assault on Rafah, the southern Gaza town where hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians had gathered. Such an operation would be "a mistake," he said, and unnecessary to defeating Hamas. The statement, reported by the Associated Press, underscored how far the relationship had deteriorated.
Israel's leadership was not sitting idle. Netanyahu's office announced that David Barnea, the country's spy chief, would travel to Qatar on Friday to meet with ceasefire mediators. The parallel moves—Blinken pressing Netanyahu in person while Barnea engaged in back-channel negotiations—suggested a coordinated push from multiple angles to break the deadlock over hostage releases and a pause in fighting.
On the ground in Gaza, the immediate crisis was unfolding at al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City. The facility was the only partially functioning medical complex in the northern part of the enclave, and it had been under sustained Israeli attack for four days. Residents reported tanks, gunfire, and flames on Thursday. Israel said it expected the assault to continue for several more days, claiming that Hamas gunmen were using the hospital as a position. Hamas denied the allegation. The distinction mattered enormously: if true, it meant a military target; if false, it meant the destruction of Gaza's last significant medical infrastructure in the north, with all the civilian consequences that entailed.
The hospital's fate crystallized the larger dispute between Washington and Jerusalem. The US had grown increasingly concerned that Israel's military operations were causing disproportionate civilian harm and were counterproductive to the stated goal of eliminating Hamas. Netanyahu's government, by contrast, maintained that such operations were necessary and that international pressure was undermining its ability to prosecute the war effectively. These disagreements were no longer abstract policy debates—they were playing out in real time, with Blinken en route to confront them directly and the UN Security Council preparing to vote on a ceasefire resolution that the US itself had drafted. What emerged from those talks would likely determine whether the US-Israel relationship could be repaired or whether the fracture would deepen.
Citas Notables
A major Israeli ground assault on Rafah would be a mistake and unnecessary to defeating Hamas— Antony Blinken, US Secretary of State
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The Guardian ↗
War & Conflict