Berlin pool row exposes enduring racism tied to swimming access across Europe

Black and African American children face a fatal drowning rate three times higher than white children in the US; children from minority ethnic communities in England are 3.5 times more likely to drown than white counterparts.
They're intimate spaces that pique people's social anxieties
Why swimming pools have become flashpoints for racial conflict across generations and continents.
Mark

Why did a theatre in Berlin think it was necessary to offer an exclusive pool afternoon for Black children in the first place?

Mimi

Because barriers exist that keep these children away. The theatre wasn't inventing a problem—they were responding to one that's documented across Europe and America. Other groups had been offered the same exclusive time without incident. The theatre saw an opportunity to create a space where these children could simply swim without the weight of being watched or unwelcome.

Mark

But the politicians who opposed it said Berlin is already diverse and free. Isn't that true?

Mimi

It's true that Berlin is diverse. But diversity and freedom don't automatically mean access. A city can be colourful on the surface while still having invisible walls. The fact that the same offer to other groups caused no uproar tells you something about whose presence in public space is assumed to be natural and whose is questioned.

Mark

The drowning statistics are shocking. Why is there such a gap between Black and white children?

Mimi

It traces back to the segregation era. When pools were explicitly segregated, Black families were locked out of learning spaces. When desegregation came, white families built private pools in all-white suburbs. That exclusion didn't end—it just became harder to see. Now you have generations where swimming was never taught, where water itself carries anxiety. It's not biology. It's history.

Mark

Katrice Rodrigues says her classes for Black and Asian communities make swimming more inclusive overall. How does that logic work?

Mimi

She's saying that inclusion isn't about erasing difference—it's about meeting people where they are. If 95 percent of Black adults can't swim, you can't include them in a generic pool programme. You have to create a space where the barriers—cultural, social, physical—can be addressed directly. Once people learn, they enter the broader swimming world. The safe space is a bridge, not a destination.

Mark

What does the Berlin cancellation tell us about where Europe is now?

Mimi

It shows that even a modest attempt to address exclusion can be weaponised. The theatre wasn't doing anything radical—just offering a few hours. But the speed with which it became a political flashpoint, the language used (apartheid, reverse discrimination), suggests that conversations about who belongs in public space are still raw and contested. The pool, as always, is where those tensions surface.

  • A Berlin theatre's inclusive pool afternoon for Black children was cancelled after far-right politicians called it 'apartheid,' flooding the venue with racist threats — while identical events for other groups had passed without a word.
  • The incident is not isolated: from a German lake that turned away non-German speakers to Swiss towns restricting asylum seekers, European pools have become recurring flashpoints where racial anxiety surfaces with startling speed.
  • Beneath the politics lies a measurable catastrophe — Black children in the US drown at three times the rate of white children, and 95% of Black adults in England cannot swim at all, a direct inheritance of generations of exclusion.
  • Organisations like Unity Swimming are pushing back, building culturally safe spaces where minority communities can learn — and reframing the argument: a pool that more people can enter is not less inclusive, but more.
  • As summers grow hotter and water becomes both refuge and risk, the question of who is allowed to learn to swim is no longer merely symbolic — it is a question of who survives.

In Berlin, a theatre's modest offer of a few hours of safe water for Black children was dismantled before it began — not by logistics, but by outrage. What followed was neither new nor surprising: swimming pools have long served as mirrors of a society's deepest anxieties about race, belonging, and the body. The cancellation joins a centuries-long pattern in which access to water has been granted or withheld not by ability, but by identity — and where exclusion, left unaddressed, becomes a matter of life and death.

A Berlin theatre arranged something simple: a few hours at a public pool, reserved for Black children and their families. Similar sessions had been offered to other groups without incident. This one never took place. When conservative and far-right politicians discovered the plan, they amplified it as an outrage — one AfD leader called it apartheid — and the theatre, flooded with racist messages and threats, cancelled the event.

The episode is part of a longer, wider pattern. Across Europe, swimming pools have repeatedly become sites where racial tensions erupt into policy and violence. A German lake barred entry to those who couldn't speak German. A Black child was singled out for an identity check in the Netherlands. Switzerland and several Eastern European countries have documented restrictions targeting asylum seekers and Roma communities. In the United States, the history runs deeper: pools were formally segregated for much of the twentieth century, and when desegregation came, white families responded by retreating to private suburban pools built to exclude. In 1964, a pool owner poured acid into water where Black swimmers were present. In 2015, a Texas officer drew his weapon at a Black teenager at a pool party.

Historian Jeff Wiltse argues that pools provoke such intensity because they are intimate — they expose the body, demand trust, and surface anxieties that go far beyond recreation. Access to water has always been about belonging.

The consequences are not abstract. In the US, Black children drown at three times the rate of white children. In England, children from minority ethnic communities are 3.5 times more likely to drown, and 95% of Black adults cannot swim. These figures are the legacy of exclusion made physical — written into the body's inability to move through water.

Katrice Rodrigues founded Unity Swimming in 2022 to confront this directly, running weekly classes for Black and Asian communities and dismantling the barriers — structural, cultural, and mythological — that keep people from the water. When critics call her classes exclusionary, she offers a different frame: safe spaces for those who have been kept out make swimming more inclusive overall. As the planet warms and water becomes ever more essential, she insists that swimming is not recreation — it is survival. The Berlin pool that never opened is part of that same story: a question, still unanswered, about who is allowed to belong in public space, and what it costs when the answer is no.

A Berlin theatre's plan to host an exclusive afternoon at a public pool for Black children and their families never happened. The Volksbühne had arranged what seemed like a straightforward gesture—a few hours when these children could swim without the barriers that often keep them away. Other groups had been offered the same arrangement without controversy. But when word spread, rightwing and conservative politicians seized on the idea and turned it into a cause. The theatre received racist emails and threats. The event was cancelled.

A local Christian Democrat politician, Aileen Weibeler, questioned the premise on social media: if Berlin is truly diverse and free, why would such a space be needed? Alice Weidel, co-leader of the far-right Alternative für Deutschland party, went further, calling it apartheid—a temporary denial of access to white people. The language was inflammatory, the intent clear. What the theatre had meant as an attempt to address exclusion became, in the hands of its opponents, evidence of reverse discrimination.

This incident did not emerge in isolation. Across Europe and North America, swimming pools have become recurring sites of racial conflict, each one revealing something about the anxieties and divisions of its moment. In Halle, an eastern German city, a public lake refused entry to anyone who could not speak German. The Netherlands saw a Black child singled out for an identity check at a pool where others were not. Switzerland restricted asylum seekers' access. Bulgaria and Romania have documented discrimination against Roma. A Romanian pool was fined in 2022 for barring Romani children. The pattern stretches back decades—in 2013, a Swiss town moved to limit asylum seekers' pool access. In the United States, the history runs deeper still.

Jeff Wiltse, who has spent years studying American pools as historical documents, traces a direct line from the segregated pools of the twentieth century to the violence that erupted when desegregation began. In 1964, a pool owner poured hydrochloric acid into a pool where Black swimmers were present. In 2015, a Texas police officer pinned an unarmed Black teenager to the ground and drew his gun at a pool party. These were not aberrations. Throughout much of the twentieth century, American public pools were explicitly segregated by race. When desegregation arrived in the late 1940s, white families responded by building private pools in suburbs designed to exclude everyone else. The pool became a symbol of who belonged and who did not.

Wiltse argues that pools carry this weight because they are intimate spaces—visually, physically, socially. They expose the body. They require trust. They trigger anxieties that run deeper than the water itself. The result is that access to pools has never been merely about swimming. It has been about belonging.

The consequences are measurable and severe. In the United States, Black and African American children drown at three times the rate of white children. In England, the disparity is worse: children from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic communities are 3.5 times more likely to drown than white children. Recent data from Sport England shows that 95 percent of Black adults and 80 percent of Black children do not swim at all. These are not coincidences. They are the legacy of exclusion made literal in the body—in the inability to move through water, in the fear that comes from never having learned.

Katrice Rodrigues, who founded Unity Swimming in 2022, has spent the past years trying to reverse this. Her organisation runs weekly classes for Black and Asian communities, confronting not just the structural barriers but the cultural ones: parents terrified of water, concerns about fitting in, the need to protect Black hair, the myth—persistent even among experienced swim teachers—that Black people cannot float. When people object that her classes are not inclusive because they exclude white people, Rodrigues responds with a different logic: by creating safe spaces where minorities can learn, she is making swimming as a whole more inclusive. More people swimming means more people who can save themselves and others.

As the planet warms and more people seek refuge in water, the stakes have only grown. Rodrigues frames swimming not as recreation but as survival—a skill that protects not just individuals but families and communities across generations. The Berlin pool that never opened, the exclusions documented across Europe, the drowning statistics that persist in the present: these are all part of the same story. A story about who gets to belong in public space, and what it costs when the answer is no.

They're visually, physically, and socially intimate spaces, and I think that continues to pique people's social anxieties
— Jeff Wiltse, author of Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America
We're making the whole of swimming more inclusive by creating these safe little spaces, which lead to more people swimming, and that makes swimming, as a whole, more inclusive
— Katrice Rodrigues, founder of Unity Swimming
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en The Guardian ↗
Contáctanos FAQ