On one of Britain's most travelled rail corridors, a dispute over pay has placed Avanti West Coast at a crossroads familiar to many institutions caught between the demands of those who do the work and the constraints of those who hold the purse strings. Drivers have rejected a pay offer, leaving the operator — already carrying the burden of Britain's worst punctuality record — to choose between seeking more public money or cutting the very services it only just expanded. The outcome will be watched not only by commuters and unions, but by a government quietly deciding which operators deserve a
Avanti West Coast drivers reject pay offer as strike threat looms
The company can either ask for more money or cut services
Mark
So Avanti's drivers just said no to a pay offer. How serious is this?
Mimi
It's serious enough that the company is now in a real bind. They either need to ask the government for more money or find savings by cutting services. That's not a comfortable position.
Luke
But how imminent is the strike? The source says it's "some way off" and that hopes remain for a deal.
Mimi
Right—it's not happening tomorrow. Talks resume Monday. But the fact that drivers voted to reject the offer means management has to come back with something better.
Mark
Why does Avanti's history with the drivers matter so much here?
Mimi
Because in 2022, the old boss blamed cancellations on the drivers, basically accused them of unofficial strikes. They haven't forgotten that. It poisons the well.
Luke
So is this really about pay, or is it about trust?
Mimi
Both. The pay offer itself wasn't good enough, but the relationship is fractured. That makes negotiating harder.
Mark
And the government is watching this?
Mimi
Absolutely. The government is moving toward public ownership of rail operators. Avanti's already the least punctual operator in Britain. A strike would be terrible optics.
Luke
Though we should note—the managers' strike was called off after a revised offer. So there's a path to settlement here.
Mimi
True. But drivers are a different constituency. They have more leverage and longer memories.
The Pulse
- Avanti's drivers have voted down a pay offer, injecting fresh uncertainty into an operator already struggling to shed its reputation for chronic delays and cancellations.
- With only 58.6% of trains arriving on time, Avanti holds Britain's worst punctuality record — a vulnerability that makes any further disruption politically explosive.
- A separate strike by train managers, threatened for September 28, was narrowly averted, but another walkout remains scheduled for October 5, keeping the pressure relentless.
- The company must now choose between asking the government for additional funding to improve its offer or finding savings by scaling back a timetable expansion that only launched last week.
- Talks resume Monday, but the shadow of 2022 lingers — when Avanti's leadership accused drivers of unofficial action and unions fired back, calling the company a 'lying cheapskate', leaving wounds that still shape the negotiating table.
- The deadlock arrives at a moment when the government is actively weighing which operators deserve to survive the transition to public ownership, making Avanti's every move a test watched far beyond the bargaining room.
On one of Britain's most travelled rail corridors, a dispute over pay has placed Avanti West Coast at a crossroads familiar to many institutions caught between the demands of those who do the work and the constraints of those who hold the purse strings. Drivers have rejected a pay offer, leaving the operator — already carrying the burden of Britain's worst punctuality record — to choose between seeking more public money or cutting the very services it only just expanded. The outcome will be watched not only by commuters and unions, but by a government quietly deciding which operators deserve a future in a renationalised railway.
Avanti West Coast, the operator running Britain's busiest rail corridor, is facing a narrowing set of choices after its train drivers voted to reject a pay offer. The company can either return to the government seeking additional funds to improve the deal, or look for savings elsewhere — potentially by cutting services, despite having only expanded its timetable the previous week.
The rejection arrives at a fraught moment. Avanti is simultaneously managing a separate dispute with its train managers, who had threatened to strike on September 28 before accepting revised terms. That action was called off, but another is still scheduled for October 5 unless members vote to accept the new offer. For Avanti's leadership, the drivers' dispute is the graver concern.
The operator carries an unwelcome distinction: it is the least punctual in Britain, with just 58.6% of services arriving on time. That record has drawn sustained criticism from figures including Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham, who has repeatedly called for the government to strip Avanti of its contract. The government, meanwhile, is already moving toward bringing train operators into public ownership as franchises expire.
Kevin Lindsay, Aslef's lead representative for Avanti drivers, confirmed that members had voted democratically to reject the offer and that talks would resume Monday. Avanti — a joint venture between FTSE 250-listed FirstGroup and Italy's state-owned Trenitalia — said only that discussions with both unions were continuing.
History adds weight to the standoff. In 2022, Avanti's then-chief executive blamed cancellations on the 'industrial relations climate', a remark union leaders interpreted as an accusation of unofficial strike action. The ensuing row, in which unions called Avanti a 'lying cheapskate', left lasting scars that continue to shape how drivers approach negotiations today.
Strike action remains possible but not imminent. If the company is forced to choose between funding a better pay deal and sustaining its expanded service, that decision will be scrutinised not just by unions and passengers, but by the government officials quietly determining whether Avanti deserves to keep running trains on the west coast main line at all.
Avanti West Coast, the operator running Britain's busiest rail corridor, faces a narrowing set of choices after its train drivers voted down a pay offer this week. The company can either go back to the government asking for more money to sweeten the deal, or it can look for savings elsewhere—potentially by cutting services, even though it only expanded its timetable last week. The rejection landed just as the operator was trying to manage a separate industrial dispute with its train managers, who had threatened to walk out on September 28 before accepting revised terms. That strike has been called off, but another is still scheduled for October 5 unless members vote to accept the improved offer.
For Avanti's leadership, the drivers' rejection is the more serious threat. The company has spent the past year fighting a reputation for chaos on the rails. It holds an unwelcome distinction: it is the least punctual operator in Britain, with only 58.6 percent of its services arriving on time according to the Office of Rail and Road. Even with recent improvements, that record haunts the franchise. Greater Manchester's mayor, Andy Burnham, has repeatedly called for the government to strip Avanti of its contract because of the poor performance. The government itself is moving toward bringing train operators back into public ownership as their franchises expire, partly to avoid paying out large compensation packages.
Kevin Lindsay, the lead Aslef representative for Avanti's drivers, said the members had voted democratically to reject the offer and that talks would resume on Monday with the aim of reaching terms the workforce could accept. An Avanti spokesman offered only that discussions with both unions were continuing. The company is a joint venture between FirstGroup, a transport firm listed on the FTSE 250, and Trenitalia, Italy's state-owned rail operator.
The tension between Avanti and its drivers carries particular weight because of history. In 2022, the operator's then-boss Phil Whittingham blamed cancellations on what he called the "current industrial relations climate," a comment that union leaders saw as an accusation of unofficial strike action. The accusation sparked a fierce row. Union leaders responded by calling Avanti a "lying cheapskate." That episode left scars. Many drivers remember it, and the memory shapes how they approach negotiations now.
Strike action by drivers remains a possibility but not an immediate one. The deadlock could still be broken if either side moves. But the timing is awkward for Avanti. The company is already under scrutiny from politicians and the public. A major service expansion came into force only last week. If the company now has to choose between funding a better pay deal and maintaining that expanded service, the choice will be watched closely—not just by the unions, but by the government officials deciding whether Avanti deserves to keep running trains on the west coast main line.
Notable Quotes
Our members have rejected the pay offer. Talks are resuming on Monday and we will endeavour to reach an agreement which is acceptable to our members.— Kevin Lindsay, Aslef lead representative for Avanti West Coast
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Sunday Times ↗
Transportation