Anwar, Putin meet at BRICS summit to strengthen Malaysia-Russia ties

Malaysia signals it is serious about engaging with major emerging economies
Anwar's first bilateral with Putin as BRICS partner country member underscores Malaysia's commitment to high-level engagement with the Global South.
Mark

So why does this meeting matter? It's not like Malaysia and Russia just started talking yesterday.

Mimi

Right, but the timing and the platform do matter. Malaysia just became a BRICS partner country in January, and this is Anwar's first bilateral with Putin in that capacity. It's a signal that Malaysia is serious about engaging with major emerging economies, not just maintaining old relationships.

Luke

But what's actually new here? The source says both countries want to expand cooperation, but it doesn't specify what that looks like. Are we talking about new trade agreements, defence deals, investment commitments?

Mimi

That's fair. The statement is more about intent than concrete deliverables. The meeting affirmed the relationship exists and both sides want to deepen it, but the specifics weren't detailed in the reporting.

Mark

What about the trade numbers? RM8.72 billion sounds significant.

Mimi

It is, in the sense that Russia is Malaysia's ninth-largest European trading partner. But put it in context: that's still a relatively modest share of Malaysia's total trade. The relationship is real but not dominant.

Luke

And we should note that Russia's FDI in ASEAN is only RM367.90 million. That's quite small compared to what China or the US invests in the region. So while the relationship matters diplomatically, economically it's still relatively limited.

Mark

So this is more about Malaysia positioning itself within the Global South than about a major economic pivot?

Mimi

Exactly. Anwar has been articulating a vision of a more balanced international order, and BRICS is one platform for that. Meeting with Putin signals Malaysia is willing to engage with countries that the West has isolated.

Luke

Though we should be careful not to overstate that either. Malaysia has maintained diplomatic relations with Russia since 1967. This isn't a new friendship born from geopolitical realignment; it's a long-standing relationship being refreshed.

Mark

What comes next? Are there follow-up meetings planned, or is this just a one-off at the summit?

Mimi

The reporting doesn't specify. But given that both countries have expressed interest in expanding collaboration, we'd expect to see more bilateral engagement. Whether that translates into actual new agreements or just more meetings is still an open question.

  • Malaysia's first bilateral meeting as a BRICS partner country gave the Anwar-Putin encounter unusual diplomatic weight — this was not routine courtesy but an opening move in a recalibrated foreign policy.
  • With Russia facing Western isolation and Malaysia navigating between traditional partners and the Global South, both leaders arrived in New Delhi with strategic reasons to be seen together.
  • Trade worth RM8.72 billion in 2025 — spanning electronics, petroleum, and chemicals — gives the relationship concrete economic stakes that neither government can afford to treat as symbolic.
  • Both sides are pushing to expand cooperation into energy, education, tourism, and defence, signalling that the relationship has room to grow well beyond its current footprint.
  • Malaysia is using BRICS and multilateral platforms to advocate for a more balanced international order, and this meeting served as a visible marker of that positioning on the world stage.

On the margins of the 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit in New Delhi, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and President Vladimir Putin met to reaffirm a bilateral relationship stretching back to 1967 — one now animated by RM8.72 billion in annual trade and Malaysia's freshly minted status as a BRICS partner country. The encounter was less a turning point than a deliberate signal: that Malaysia's engagement with the emerging world is substantive, not ceremonial. In an era of shifting global alignments, Putrajaya is choosing to be present at every table that matters to the Global South.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim met Russian President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit in New Delhi — a bilateral that carried particular significance as Malaysia's first high-level engagement since formally joining the bloc as a partner country at the start of 2025. That it was Anwar's opening move at the summit was itself a signal: Malaysia intends its BRICS membership to be active, not ornamental.

The two countries share a diplomatic relationship dating to 1967, built across trade, energy, education, tourism, and defence. In 2025, bilateral trade reached RM8.72 billion, with Malaysia exporting electrical and electronic goods, machinery, and processed food, while importing petroleum products, minerals, and chemicals from Russia. Russia ranks as Malaysia's ninth-largest European trading partner — flows substantial enough that both governments have clear incentive to protect and expand them.

The meeting also carried a broader subtext. Anwar has been articulating a vision of global governance more representative of emerging economies, while Putin has his own reasons to cultivate partners who do not treat Russia as a pariah. Their encounter in New Delhi was thus simultaneously bilateral and symbolic — a statement about how Malaysia reads a reconfiguring world order.

Across ASEAN, trade with Russia reached US$18.1 billion in 2024, with Malaysia positioned as a natural hub for Russian engagement in the region. What the New Delhi meeting produced was not a dramatic realignment but a reaffirmation: both nations see value in the relationship and are prepared to deepen it, as Malaysia continues its careful balancing act between Western partnerships and its growing ties with the Global South.

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim sat down with Russian President Vladimir Putin in New Delhi on the margins of the 18th BRICS Leaders' Summit, a meeting that carried particular weight as Malaysia's first bilateral engagement since formally joining the bloc as a partner country at the start of 2025. The conversation between the two leaders touched on economic cooperation, strategic alignment, and the shape of Malaysia's role within an expanding network of emerging economies—a positioning that has become central to how Putrajaya conducts its foreign policy.

The timing mattered. Anwar had arrived in India specifically to participate in the summit, and this bilateral with Putin was his opening move, signaling where Malaysia intended to direct its diplomatic energy. The meeting underscored what both governments see as essential: maintaining regular, substantive contact at the highest levels, particularly as Malaysia works to deepen its foothold among the world's major developing economies. For a country of Malaysia's size and economic weight, such engagement is not ceremonial—it is the machinery through which trade flows, investment decisions get made, and strategic interests align.

Malaysia and Russia have maintained formal diplomatic ties since 1967, a relationship that has accumulated layers over decades. The two countries cooperate across trade and investment, energy, education, tourism, and defence. Neither side has suggested these partnerships are strained; rather, both have signaled interest in expanding what already exists and opening new channels of collaboration. The bilateral meeting in New Delhi was framed as an opportunity to refresh that commitment and explore where mutual benefit might deepen.

The economic picture provides concrete grounding for why such meetings happen. In 2025, Malaysia and Russia traded goods worth RM8.72 billion—approximately US$2.04 billion. Russia ranked as Malaysia's ninth-largest trading partner among European nations. The composition of that trade tells a story: Malaysia ships electrical and electronic products, machinery, equipment and parts, and processed food to Russia. In return, Malaysia imports petroleum products, minerals, chemicals, and chemical-based products. These are not trivial flows; they represent supply chains, employment, and revenue streams that both governments have reason to protect and expand.

The broader context involves Malaysia's deliberate positioning within the Global South. Through BRICS and other multilateral platforms, Anwar has been articulating a vision of international order that is more inclusive and balanced—language that reflects Malaysia's view that the traditional architecture of global governance does not adequately represent emerging economies. Putin, facing Western sanctions and international isolation, has his own reasons to cultivate relationships with countries that do not treat Russia as a pariah. The meeting in New Delhi was thus not merely bilateral; it was also a statement about how Malaysia sees its place in a reconfiguring world.

Regional trade data adds another layer. Across all of ASEAN, trade with Russia in 2024 reached US$18.1 billion, while Russian foreign direct investment in the bloc totalled RM367.90 million (US$92.97 million). These figures are modest compared to ASEAN's trade with China or the United States, but they represent real economic presence and potential. Malaysia, as the largest economy in ASEAN by some measures and a significant trading hub, is a natural focal point for Russian engagement in Southeast Asia.

What emerges from the meeting is not a dramatic shift in Malaysia-Russia relations but rather a reaffirmation of intent: both countries see value in the relationship and want to signal that value to their respective publics and to the international community. For Malaysia, the bilateral with Putin was also a statement about its BRICS membership—that joining the bloc was not a symbolic gesture but a commitment to active engagement with major emerging powers. As Malaysia continues to navigate between its traditional Western partnerships and its deepening ties with the Global South, meetings like this one in New Delhi become the visible markers of that balancing act.

Both countries expressed interest in expanding bilateral economic engagement and exploring new areas of collaboration
— Malaysian government statement
Contact Us FAQ