El Niño does not operate in isolation—its impacts ripple through global commerce, agriculture, and food security.
El Niño probability jumped to 90% for the coming quarter, with WMO warning of extreme weather including intense rainfall, severe droughts, and thermal stress across multiple Argentine regions. The phenomenon could trigger cascading effects on global commerce, fishing industries, water access, and infrastructure like Panama Canal operations, similar to previous extreme episodes.
- WMO raised El Niño probability to 90% for the coming quarter as of early June 2026
- The 2023-2024 El Niño episode made those years the hottest on record
- Northern Argentina, northeastern Argentina, and Uruguay face above-normal rainfall with risks of flooding, severe storms, and landslides
- Previous extreme El Niño episodes have disrupted Panama Canal operations and caused severe water access crises
World Meteorological Organization chief Celeste Saulo warns of 90% probability of El Niño this quarter, predicting severe droughts, floods, and landslides across Argentina and South America with cascading economic impacts.
Celeste Saulo, who leads the World Meteorological Organization, delivered a stark warning in early June: the odds of El Niño arriving in South America within the next three months had climbed to 90 percent. What made her alert urgent was not the phenomenon itself—El Niño is a natural climate cycle that occurs every two to seven years—but what it would likely bring to Argentina and the region: severe droughts in some places, torrential rains in others, and the kind of extreme weather that puts lives and livelihoods at risk.
El Niño works by warming the equatorial Pacific Ocean in ways that ripple through the entire atmosphere. The last time it took hold, in 2023 and 2024, those years became the hottest on record. This time, Saulo warned, the episode could be potent enough to worsen both drought and intense rainfall simultaneously—a paradox that reflects how climate systems can be brutally uneven in their effects. For the three-month period beginning in June, the WMO forecast above-normal temperatures across nearly every region of the planet, with additional risks of heat stress, water scarcity in vulnerable areas, and the kind of flooding and severe drought that can reshape landscapes and economies.
The consequences would not be confined to Argentina. Saulo outlined a map of vulnerability across South America and Central America. In Peru and Ecuador, what locals call the Coastal El Niño would warm ocean waters and swell rainfall, devastating the fishing industry that depends on cooler currents. Northern South America, Central America, and northeastern Brazil faced the opposite threat: below-normal rainfall and drought conditions severe enough to strain water supplies and, in past episodes, to compromise the operational capacity of the Panama Canal itself. But the southeast—southern Brazil, Paraguay, northern Argentina, northeastern Argentina, and Uruguay—would experience above-normal precipitation, bringing three cascading dangers: flooding, severe storms, and landslides.
What made Saulo's warning particularly significant was her emphasis on what scientists call cascading effects. El Niño does not operate in isolation. Its impacts ripple through global commerce, agricultural production, water systems, and food security. The phenomenon can amplify when combined with the broader warming trend from climate change, though scientists have not yet established that climate change makes El Niño itself more frequent or intense. Still, when the two forces converge, the result can be more extreme weather events and, consequently, more natural disasters.
Saulo acknowledged the anxiety such forecasts can generate. She urged the public to place trust in national meteorological services—the institutions equipped to translate global warnings into local action and to provide the most current, authoritative information as conditions evolved. The message was clear: preparation matters more than panic. The data was solid. The threat was real. But the response would depend on how well communities, governments, and individuals heeded the guidance of those trained to read the signals in the sky.
Notable Quotes
We must prepare for a potentially powerful El Niño episode that will worsen both drought and intense rainfall— Celeste Saulo, WMO Secretary General
El Niño will have cascading effects with possible repercussions on global commerce, spanning from climate variability to economics and population security— Celeste Saulo, WMO Secretary General
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Why does a 90 percent probability matter more than, say, 70 percent? Doesn't El Niño happen fairly regularly anyway?
The jump to 90 percent means it's almost certain to arrive. And yes, it happens regularly, but the timing and intensity vary wildly. A weak El Niño might barely be noticed. A strong one reshapes harvests, fishing seasons, water availability. The WMO is saying this one is likely to be potent.
Saulo mentioned cascading effects. What does that actually mean for someone living in Buenos Aires or Rosario?
It means the rain or drought doesn't stay isolated. If northern Argentina floods, crops fail there, prices rise in the city. If the fishing industry collapses in Peru, that affects global food markets and prices Argentines pay. The effects ripple outward and backward.
She also said climate change and El Niño can amplify each other. Are we looking at something worse than either would be alone?
Potentially, yes. El Niño brings natural temperature swings. Climate change is a steady warming trend. When they overlap, you can get heat waves that are more severe, droughts that are more prolonged, storms that are more intense. The baseline is already higher.
Why did she emphasize trusting national meteorological services specifically?
Because there's a lot of misinformation and fear around extreme weather. The WMO can issue global warnings, but each country's meteorological service has the local expertise and real-time data to tell people what to actually do—where to prepare for floods, where to conserve water. She was trying to cut through the noise.
Is there anything Argentina can do now, in June, to prepare?
That's the question. Water management, infrastructure reinforcement in flood-prone areas, agricultural planning. But honestly, much of it depends on decisions made months or years before. What matters now is paying attention to what the meteorological service says next.