In Tasmania's quiet agricultural north-west, a technology company building artificial intelligence data centres has revealed — and then hastily concealed — plans to draw cooling water from a state-owned irrigation network designed to sustain farms. The episode surfaces a tension as old as settlement itself: who holds prior claim to a shared resource when new industries arrive with urgent needs and quiet intentions. Firmus Technologies' deleted disclosure has prompted farming groups to ask whether the digital economy's thirst will be weighed against the seasons that farmers must plan years in a
AI company Firmus quietly planned to tap Tasmania's farm irrigation water
Irrigation water is for irrigating farmland
So Firmus accidentally revealed something they didn't want public yet. What exactly did they say about the water?
They posted on their FAQ that they'd be drawing cooling water from Tasmania's state irrigation system—the one that supplies farmers. Then they deleted it after the ABC asked about it.
But did they actually apply for that water, or were they just exploring the idea?
They told the ABC they hadn't made a formal request yet. It sounds like contingency planning at this stage.
Why would an AI company need irrigation water in the first place?
Data centres generate enormous heat. They need cooling systems running constantly. Firmus says it'll use rainwater as the primary source, but in dry seasons or if that's insufficient, they were considering tapping the irrigation network.
And how much water are we talking about?
Firmus claims the Wesley Vale facility at full capacity would use about as much annually as a restaurant. Though that's their estimate, not independently verified.
What's the actual problem here, then?
Irrigation water is legally restricted to agriculture and hydrogen production. Farmers depend on that supply, especially in dry years. If Firmus diverts it without proper consultation, it could threaten agricultural security.
Has anyone actually stopped them from doing this?
Not yet. Tasmanian Irrigation said any request would require government consideration and community engagement. But Firmus hasn't formally asked.
What do the farmers say?
The farming body says it would be highly unusual and concerning. They want to be consulted if this moves forward, and they're questioning whether Firmus has even started that conversation.
So this is really about process—whether Firmus is trying to bypass the normal channels?
Exactly. The farming representative said if Firmus invests in new infrastructure, there's room to talk. But right now, it looks like they were hoping to quietly tap an existing system.
Il Polso
- Firmus Technologies published — then scrubbed — a FAQ revealing plans to tap Tasmania's farm irrigation system for AI data centre cooling, only after ABC journalists made direct inquiries.
- Tasmanian Irrigation's own legislation confines its water supply to agriculture and hydrogen production, meaning any data centre request would legally require government deliberation and public consultation.
- Farming peak body TasFarmers warned that irrigation water is already stretched during dry seasons, and that planning around it without farmer consultation undermines the confidence growers depend on.
- Firmus insists rainwater harvesting is its primary strategy and frames irrigation access as contingency only, comparing its annual water use at full capacity to that of a single restaurant.
- No formal request from Firmus has reached Tasmanian Irrigation, and the only precedent for non-agricultural supply — the Tamar Scheme — involved years of legislation, negotiation, and agreed community benefit.
- TasFarmers says it remains open to dialogue, but only if Firmus is willing to invest in new water infrastructure — a conversation, they note, that has not yet begun.
In Tasmania's quiet agricultural north-west, a technology company building artificial intelligence data centres has revealed — and then hastily concealed — plans to draw cooling water from a state-owned irrigation network designed to sustain farms. The episode surfaces a tension as old as settlement itself: who holds prior claim to a shared resource when new industries arrive with urgent needs and quiet intentions. Firmus Technologies' deleted disclosure has prompted farming groups to ask whether the digital economy's thirst will be weighed against the seasons that farmers must plan years in advance.
Firmus Technologies, which is developing three artificial intelligence data centre facilities across Tasmania, briefly published information on its website indicating it was in discussions to draw supplementary cooling water from Tasmanian Irrigation — the state-owned network that supplies water to farmers. The disclosure appeared in a frequently asked questions section tied to community sessions for its proposed Wesley Vale site in the state's north-west. After the ABC made inquiries, Firmus removed the section, saying it had been inadvertently published from an internal document.
The company maintains that rainwater captured from rooftops remains its primary water solution, and that any connection to Tasmanian Irrigation was being explored only as a contingency. If that connection proved unavailable before the facility became operational, Firmus said it would rely on water carts. The company also noted its cooling systems only activate above 26 degrees Celsius, and claimed annual water consumption at full capacity would be comparable to a restaurant.
That framing has done little to reassure the farming sector. Tasmanian Irrigation's legislative mandate restricts supply to agriculture and hydrogen production, and any request from outside those categories would require government consideration and community engagement — including consultation with the farmers who are the network's existing customers. A Tasmanian Irrigation spokesperson confirmed no formal request had been received from Firmus.
Neil Grose of TasFarmers described the situation as highly irregular. He stressed that irrigation water exists for farmland, and that farmers require certainty in their supply — especially during dry periods when availability tightens. The only comparable case of Tasmanian Irrigation supplying a non-agricultural user, he noted, was the proposed Tamar Scheme supporting hydrogen development, which had passed through legislation and involved genuine consultation with farming representatives who agreed on shared benefit. Wesley Vale had undergone no such process. Grose said TasFarmers would engage with Firmus, but only if the company was prepared to invest in new water infrastructure — and acknowledged that conversation had not yet started.
Firmus Technologies, a company building artificial intelligence data centres across Tasmania, posted a statement on its website this week that it intended to draw cooling water from the state's farm irrigation system. The company then deleted the disclosure after being contacted by the ABC, saying the information had been inadvertently published as part of an internal note.
The revelation emerged from a frequently asked questions section on Firmus's website, posted alongside announcements of community drop-in sessions for its proposed Wesley Vale facility in the state's north-west. In that section, the company stated it did not plan to rely on Tasmania Water for its cooling needs, noting the utility had no connection to the site. Instead, it said the majority of water for cooling would come from rainwater captured off the roof. But the same section also indicated that discussions were underway regarding supplementary water sources from Tasmanian Irrigation, the state-owned company that supplies water to farmers across the region. After the ABC made inquiries, Firmus removed the section entirely.
Firmus is proposing three AI facilities in Tasmania: one already under construction in the Launceston suburb of St Leonards, another in Bell Bay in the north, and the Wesley Vale site in the north-west. The company has submitted a development application to Latrobe Council for Wesley Vale, though the council is still awaiting additional information before making the application public. These facilities house data centre infrastructure, advanced cooling systems, and graphics processing units that generate the computational tokens required by artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT.
When contacted by the ABC, Firmus said it had not intended to make the irrigation water information public. A company spokesperson stated that rainwater harvesting and on-site storage remained the primary water solution for the facility, designed to meet operational requirements. The company said discussions about supplementary water sources were separate from that primary strategy and related to resilience and contingency planning. If a connection to Tasmanian Irrigation was not available before the facility needed to operate, Firmus said it would use water carts to meet initial cooling requirements. The company also noted that its cooling systems only activate on days when temperatures exceed 26 degrees Celsius, and claimed the Wesley Vale facility at full capacity would use no more water annually than a restaurant.
Tasmanian Irrigation's legislative framework restricts water supply to agriculture and hydrogen production. Any application from industries outside those categories would require consideration by the Tasmanian government and engagement with the community, including the company's existing customers—the farmers who depend on that water. A Tasmanian Irrigation spokesperson said the company had received no formal request from Firmus and made clear that any such request would trigger a process involving government and public consultation.
Neil Grose, chief operating officer of TasFarmers, the peak farming body in the state, said it would be highly unusual for Tasmanian Irrigation to supply water to a data centre. He emphasized that irrigation water exists for irrigating farmland, and expressed concern that Firmus appeared to be planning to use that water without going through proper channels or consulting with farmers first. Grose noted that farmers need confidence in their water supply, particularly during dry seasons when availability becomes constrained. The only precedent for Tasmanian Irrigation supplying water to a non-agricultural user, he said, was the proposed Tamar Scheme, which would support both farmers and hydrogen developments in northern Tasmania. That scheme, he pointed out, had been carefully planned, passed through legislation, and involved consultation with both industry and farming representatives who agreed on the joint benefit. Wesley Vale, by contrast, had undergone no such process. Grose said TasFarmers was open to conversations with Firmus, but only if the company was prepared to invest in new water infrastructure. He suggested that such a conversation had not yet begun.
Citazioni salienti
It would be highly unusual for Tasmanian Irrigation to supply water to a data centre. Irrigation water is for irrigating farmland.— Neil Grose, chief operating officer of TasFarmers
Any application for water from industries outside of agriculture and hydrogen would require consideration by the Tasmanian government and engagement with the community, including our customers.— Tasmanian Irrigation spokesperson