Twenty-five years after September 11th reshaped the world, and five years after America's longest war quietly concluded, the Taliban once again governs Afghanistan — a full circle that forces a reckoning with what two decades of sacrifice, strategy, and nation-building ultimately produced. The movement that sheltered the architects of 9/11 now holds the ministries, the borders, and the presidential palace in Kabul, not as a transitional force but as a consolidated government. History rarely delivers endings this symmetrical, and rarely are they this sobering.
CBS News
· Sep 07, 2026
· security
· 1 min read
High
Sourcing: Verified
25 Years After 9/11: Taliban Reasserts Control in Afghanistan
◉
War & Conflict
9303 related articles
Ukrainian drones strike Moscow hours after CIA director's visit
Google News · 100% match
Polish PM: Russian Kh-101 missile likely struck eastern Poland near Uk…
BBC News · 99% match
Trump announces Gaza ceasefire deal as Israel, Hamas agree to hostage …
Birmingham Live · 99% match
Russia pivots to air war as ground offensive stalls, Ukraine tests hom…
The Guardian · 99% match
Trump Claims Gaza Ceasefire as Eighth Conflict Resolved, Targets Ukrai…
Agencia EFE · 99% match
Related Coverage
Al Jazeera · Sep 09
Lebanon's schools face dual crisis: reopening classrooms while sheltering displaced families
Lebanese schools prepare to reopen September 15 while still sheltering over one million displaced people from Israeli mi…
NPR · Sep 09 U.S. military destroys 5 Iranian oil tankers in response to warship attacksThe U.S. military destroyed five Iranian oil tankers Tuesday in response to attacks on American Navy warships, escalatin…
The Guardian · Sep 09 Europe's ambition-reality gap fuels far-right rise as voters lose faith in unityA major study reveals Europeans overwhelmingly support a strong, united Europe but lack confidence it can be achieved, c…
Reuters · Sep 09 Russian drones strike Ukraine-Moldova border crossing, killing and injuring civiliansRussian drones struck a Ukraine-Moldova border crossing, killing and injuring civilians in the attack. The incident mark…
Bias & Framing
⚖
CBS frames Taliban's return as inevitable consequence of US withdrawal, emphasizing geopolitical shift without substantial analysis of competing interpretations or policy alternatives.
Bias Direction
center-left
Confidence
MED
Retrospective framing that emphasizes America's 'longest war' and its end-state failure, positioning the Taliban's return as the primary narrative outcome rather than exploring complex causation or strategic debates.
America's longest war
firmly back in control
significant geopolitical shift
Voices from Afghan civilians, particularly women and minorities affected by Taliban rule
Counterterrorism experts' assessments of security implications
Perspectives from US military/policy officials defending withdrawal rationale
Regional stakeholders (Pakistan, China, Russia) and their strategic interests
Afghan government-in-exile or resistance movement perspectives
Analysis of whether alternative withdrawal strategies existed
Geopolitical Impact
🌎
Taliban's complete reassertion of control in Afghanistan post-2021 US withdrawal represents a major geopolitical realignment, signaling American strategic retreat and potential regional power consolidation by Taliban-aligned actors.
Escalation Risk
moderate
Confidence
HIGH
Afghanistan
United States
Pakistan
Iran
Central Asia
South Asia
Middle East
Significant shift favoring Taliban and regional powers (Pakistan, Iran, China, Russia) who have engaged with Taliban governance. Diminished US influence in Central/South Asia. Potential power vacuum attracting non-state actors and rival regional powers seeking influence. China and Russia expanding strategic positioning in Afghanistan.
Similar to Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan (1989), which created power vacuums, enabled extremist networks, and reshaped regional alignments for decades. Taliban's return mirrors post-Soviet mujahideen fragmentation patterns.
Economic Lens
📈
Taliban's reassertion of control in Afghanistan post-US withdrawal creates geopolitical instability with implications for regional trade, defense spending, and energy markets, though direct economic impact on US economy is limited.
Market Signal
neutral
Confidence
MED
Defense and military contracting
Energy and natural resources
International trade and commerce
Refugee services and humanitarian aid
Regional banking and finance
Minimal direct impact on US consumers. Potential indirect effects include: slightly elevated defense spending through government budgets (affecting tax policy), possible energy price volatility if regional instability affects oil markets, and increased humanitarian aid costs reflected in government spending.
Likely triggers increased defense budget allocations, potential sanctions regimes, heightened border security investments, and expanded refugee resettlement programs. May influence US foreign policy toward China and Russia in Central Asia. Could prompt review of military intervention strategies and international alliance commitments.