Across Australia, a quiet but telling shift is underway: one million single people have turned to AI chatbots not merely for conversation, but for something they are willing to call romance. Driven by exhaustion with conventional dating and the appeal of connection without conflict, they are choosing designed companions over unpredictable ones. The phenomenon raises an ancient question in modern dress — whether intimacy requires another consciousness, or whether the feeling of being understood is enough.
1 Million Aussies Report Romantic Relationships With AI Chatbots
How are you ever going to date normally if you're dating Khaleesi?
Mark
So one million Australians are in romantic relationships with chatbots. That's a real number?
Mimi
According to YouGov, yes—four percent of single Australians self-reported that. It's not a small survey artifact.
Luke
But what does "romantic relationship" mean to them? Did YouGov define it, or did each person interpret it differently?
Mimi
That's the gap. The reporting doesn't specify YouGov's exact wording. We know people said they had one, but the definition could range from casual flirtation to something more sustained.
Mark
Why is this happening now? Is it just loneliness, or is something else shifting?
Mimi
Dating app fatigue is the main driver cited. People have been on too many disappointing dates. They're looking for something easier, and chatbots don't argue or judge.
Luke
But easier isn't the same as better. Are these people actually lonely, or are they just exhausted by the performance of dating apps?
Mimi
Probably both. The research suggests younger people find chatbots less demanding than other people. That appeal is real, whether it's healthy is another question.
Mark
What's the actual risk here? Is it that people stop dating, or that they can't date anymore?
Mimi
Hocking's concern is behavioral—people are choosing to stay home with their AI companion instead of going out. If that becomes habitual, the skills and confidence needed for human connection atrophy.
Luke
But we don't have data on how many people are actually doing that, or for how long. The warning is reasonable, but it's not yet a documented epidemic.
Mark
So what's the honest takeaway?
Mimi
Chatbots can be useful tools for dating skills. But if they become a substitute for human connection, they're a problem. The line between tool and trap is thin and personal.
Der Puls
- Dating app fatigue has reached a tipping point, with Australians reporting so many fruitless encounters that a non-human alternative has begun to feel like relief rather than compromise.
- One million people now claim romantic bonds with AI chatbots — and another eight percent say they can imagine following — suggesting the trend is still accelerating, not plateauing.
- The chatbot's core appeal is its architecture of frictionlessness: no judgment, no arguments, no demands, and a personality users can sculpt to their own specifications, including modeling it after fictional or celebrity figures.
- Experts warn of a compounding feedback loop — the more someone retreats into frictionless AI companionship, the more the ordinary turbulence of human relationships feels intolerable rather than normal.
- The advised path forward is narrow: use AI as a training ground for real-world dating skills, not as a destination — but that line is proving difficult to hold as the technology grows more convincing.
Across Australia, a quiet but telling shift is underway: one million single people have turned to AI chatbots not merely for conversation, but for something they are willing to call romance. Driven by exhaustion with conventional dating and the appeal of connection without conflict, they are choosing designed companions over unpredictable ones. The phenomenon raises an ancient question in modern dress — whether intimacy requires another consciousness, or whether the feeling of being understood is enough.
One million Australian singles — four percent of the country's unattached population — have reported romantic relationships with AI chatbots, according to YouGov data released this week. Another eight percent say they could imagine developing such feelings. The numbers land at a moment when dating fatigue has become something close to a recognized condition.
Dating expert Jana Hocking, speaking on the Today show, traced the appeal directly to accumulated disappointment. People have endured too many bad dates, she argued, and AI offers what the conventional dating world does not: a companion whose personality can be designed from scratch, whose appearance can be chosen, and who can be programmed to send good morning texts or speak in the voice of a beloved fictional character. Hocking offered her own hypothetical — a chatbot styled after Brad Pitt in Legends of the Fall — and nine.com.au confirmed the technical ease of the concept by generating a Tom Holland persona through Google's Gemini in a matter of moments.
Among Gen Z and millennial daters, roughly two in five cited the chatbot's inability to judge, argue, or make demands as its most attractive quality. More than one in five believed AI relationships could be just as meaningful as human ones — a statistic Hocking found troubling. She described users who are skipping real dates entirely, preferring to remain home with their AI companion, and identified the underlying risk: each frictionless interaction makes the unpredictability of human connection feel less worthwhile, not more.
Hocking stopped short of condemning the technology outright. Chatbots, she acknowledged, can serve genuine purposes — helping someone practice flirting, refine a message, or gain perspective on a relationship dynamic. But she drew a firm line between AI as a tool and AI as a substitute, and posed the question she believes cuts deepest: how does someone return to ordinary human dating after they have been partnering with a perfectly responsive, endlessly patient, custom-built companion? As the technology grows more sophisticated, she warned, that return becomes harder to make.
One million Australian singles have admitted to romantic relationships with AI chatbots. That's four percent of the country's unattached population, according to YouGov data released this week. Another eight percent say they could imagine developing romantic feelings for a chatbot sometime in the future.
The numbers arrive at a moment when dating fatigue has become a recognized condition among single Australians. Dating expert Jana Hocking, speaking on the Today show, framed the phenomenon plainly: people have been on too many bad dates. They're searching for something the conventional dating world isn't delivering, and they're finding it—or something that feels like it—through AI interfaces. The appeal is architectural. Users can design their chatbot's personality from scratch. They can choose its appearance. Some have modeled their AI partners after fictional characters like Game of Thrones' Khaleesi. The chatbot can be programmed to send good morning texts, to engage in emotional conversation, to respond as if it were a specific actor or public figure. Hocking offered her own example: she said she would create an AI companion styled after Brad Pitt in Legends of the Fall, and the chatbot would speak to her as that version of him would.
When nine.com.au tested this capability using Google's Gemini, the process proved straightforward. A prompt requesting a Tom Holland-style Peter Parker persona generated a semi-believable characterization—though the actual appeal of developing romantic feelings for it remained questionable. The ease of the technical execution, however, underscored why the concept might attract people seeking connection without friction.
The YouGov research identified what makes chatbots appealing relative to human partners. Among Gen Z and millennial daters particularly, roughly two in five cited the chatbot's inability to judge them, argue with them, or make demands on them as the most attractive feature. More than one in five of those respondents believed relationships with AI could be just as meaningful as relationships with people. Hocking called that statistic concerning. She noted that some users are abandoning real dates altogether, choosing instead to stay home with their AI companion. The behavior pattern suggests a feedback loop: the more someone interacts with a non-judgmental, demand-free chatbot, the less appealing the unpredictability and friction of human dating becomes.
Hocking stopped short of condemning AI use in dating entirely. She acknowledged that chatbots could serve as practical tools—helping someone learn to flirt, offering feedback on messages before they're sent, or providing perspective on relationship dynamics. But she issued a stark warning about the technology's addictive potential. The critical distinction, she argued, is between using AI as a tool to improve your dating life and using it as a substitute for one. "How are you ever going to date normally," she asked, "if you're dating Khaleesi?" The question cuts to the heart of what concerns her: that as AI companions become more sophisticated and responsive, the gap between what they offer and what human relationships demand will widen, making the return to actual dating harder, not easier.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Everyone's gone on one too many bad dates. They're looking for something a little bit more that they're not finding in the dating world, and they're finding it through these chatbots.— Jana Hocking, dating expert
They can become addictive, and you've got to remind yourself they aren't real. Use it as a tool, not a companion.— Jana Hocking, dating expert
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Nine.com.au ↗
Technology