US launches second day of strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen

Houthis reported five deaths from Thursday's explosions; no confirmed civilian casualties reported in Friday strikes.
We've degraded their capacity. I don't think they can perpetrate strikes the same way.
The Pentagon's assessment of whether Thursday's bombardment actually reduced the Houthis' ability to wage large-scale attacks.

US strikes focused on radar facilities Friday, following Thursday's larger multinational operation that deployed 150 precision munitions across 28 locations in Yemen. Houthis vowed retaliation and fired a missile at a civilian vessel; Pentagon claims strikes degraded their capacity for large-scale missile attacks on commercial shipping.

  • US conducted second strike on Friday targeting radar installations; Thursday's operation deployed 150 precision munitions across 28 locations in Yemen
  • Houthis have harassed Red Sea shipping since October; the waterway carries roughly 15% of global maritime traffic
  • Houthis reported 5 deaths from Thursday's explosions; fired missile at civilian vessel Friday without hitting target
  • Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered the Thursday strike from military hospital while undergoing cancer treatment complications

The US conducted a second consecutive day of military strikes against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen, targeting radar installations after warning of continued response to attacks on Red Sea shipping.

The American military struck Houthi targets in Yemen for a second consecutive day on Friday, this time with a narrower focus and without allied support. The operation targeted radar installations operated by the Iranian-backed militant group, according to military officials. It came twenty-four hours after a far larger coordinated assault involving British forces and support from the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and Bahrain—an action that had struck sixty objectives across twenty-eight locations across Yemen and fired one hundred fifty precision munitions from F-18 fighters launched from the aircraft carrier Dwight Eisenhower, along with Tomahawk missiles from destroyers and a submarine.

President Biden had made clear the previous day that more strikes would follow if the Houthis did not cease their campaign against merchant vessels transiting the Red Sea, a waterway through which roughly fifteen percent of global maritime traffic flows. Speaking in Pennsylvania, he stated flatly that he would order additional attacks if the group continued what he called "indignant" behavior. The warning proved prescient. On Friday, the Houthis fired a missile at a civilian ship, though they missed their target. The group had already vowed retaliation for Thursday's bombardment.

The escalating confrontation traces back to early October, when the Houthis began harassing commercial shipping in the Red Sea. By Tuesday of the week in question, they launched a coordinated barrage of missiles and drones that military officials said crossed a threshold. That strike, directed at American naval vessels positioned to protect commercial transit, prompted Biden to authorize the Thursday operation. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, hospitalized for complications related to prostate cancer treatment, issued the order from his military medical facility.

American officials framed the strikes as purely defensive, designed to degrade the Houthis' capacity to launch large-scale missile attacks without escalating broader regional tensions. General Douglas Sims, director of the Joint Staff, told reporters that the Thursday operation had substantially reduced the group's ability to conduct attacks of the scale they had demonstrated earlier in the week. "We've degraded their capacity," he said. "I don't think they can perpetrate strikes the same way they did the other day." The Houthis reported that five people died in the explosions.

The Pentagon continues assessing the full impact of Thursday's operation, but the calculus driving American strategy extends beyond immediate military effect. Since the crisis began in October, the United States has worked to prevent the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza from spreading across the region. It reinforced military presence in the area as a deterrent and launched an intensive diplomatic campaign, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveling to the Middle East four times in three months. Iran, the Houthis' principal backer, has condemned the strikes as fueling regional instability but has not signaled interest in direct confrontation.

White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby emphasized that the United States harbors no desire for war with the Houthis or broader conflict in Yemen. "We're not interested in a war against the Houthis in Yemen, we're not interested in any kind of conflict," he said. "We want their attacks to cease." The administration maintains that all targeted sites were legitimate military objectives under both American law and international legal standards.

Not all voices in Washington accept this framing. Democratic Representative Elisa Slotkin, a former intelligence official, expressed concern on social media that Iran might be deliberately drawing the United States deeper into the crisis. She warned of regional escalation risk, noting that Iran uses groups like the Houthis as proxies to wage battles while maintaining plausible deniability and avoiding direct confrontation. Yet she also backed Thursday's military action, suggesting the message needed to be clear. The coming days will reveal whether the Houthis interpret the strikes as a sufficient cost to their operations, or whether they continue the harassment that has already disrupted one of the world's most vital shipping corridors.

We're not interested in a war against the Houthis in Yemen, we're not interested in any kind of conflict. We want their attacks to cease.
— John Kirby, White House National Security Council spokesman
We've degraded their capacity. I don't think they can perpetrate strikes the same way they did the other day.
— General Douglas Sims, Director of the Joint Staff
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why did the US wait until Tuesday to strike, if the Houthis had been attacking ships since October?

Model

The Tuesday attack was different in scale and directness. They fired at American military vessels, not just merchant ships. That crossed a line Biden had apparently drawn in his mind—a direct threat to U.S. forces changed the calculus.

Inventor

So this is about protecting American military assets, not merchant shipping?

Model

It's both, but the military threat was the trigger. The merchant traffic matters enormously—fifteen percent of global shipping—but the immediate justification was defensive: protecting the Navy's ability to operate in international waters.

Inventor

Why does Iran matter so much here? The Houthis are doing the attacking.

Model

Because Iran backs them. If you strike the Houthis and Iran retaliates directly, you've got a much bigger war. The U.S. is trying to degrade the Houthis' capability without provoking Tehran into open conflict.

Inventor

Is that working?

Model

Too early to say. Iran says the strikes fuel instability but hasn't moved toward direct confrontation. The Houthis fired a missile on Friday anyway. The question is whether degrading their radar and missile capacity actually stops them, or just makes them angrier.

Inventor

What about the five people who died?

Model

The Houthis reported that. No independent verification. The U.S. calls all the targets legitimate military objectives. But five people is five people, and it's part of why some Americans worry this could spiral.

Inventor

Into what?

Model

A regional war. Israel and Hamas are already fighting in Gaza. If the Houthis keep attacking, the U.S. keeps striking, and Iran decides it needs to defend its allies openly, you've got a much larger conflict. That's what keeps officials up at night.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em El País ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ