US, Iran trade conflicting claims as nuclear deal talks stall

The war launched February 28 killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, several top officials, and hundreds of civilians; ongoing blockade of Strait of Hormuz fuels global inflation.
Iran cannot out-wait him, Trump insisted, even as the blockade holds.
Trump framed the standoff as a test of will, dismissing concerns that the economic pain might weaken his political position.

Three months after a war that killed Iran's supreme leader and sealed one of the world's most vital waterways, Washington and Tehran find themselves locked in a contest of competing truths as much as competing demands. The United States insists Iran must surrender its enriched uranium and accept no relief in return, while Iran denies ever agreeing to such terms and proposes arrangements the White House calls fabricated. What began as cautious optimism about a possible deal has hardened, by Wednesday's cabinet meeting, into a tableau of irreconcilable positions — each side broadcasting a different version of reality to a world already paying the price in rising energy costs and unresolved war.

  • A ceasefire since April 8 has produced no breakthrough, and Trump's Wednesday cabinet remarks made clear the US position has only hardened — no sanctions relief, no unfrozen assets, no easing of the naval blockade.
  • Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which more than a fifth of global oil flows, continues to drive inflation and energy instability worldwide, raising the stakes of every failed negotiating session.
  • The two sides cannot even agree on what they have discussed: Iran's state television described a draft memorandum on lifting the blockade, which the White House dismissed as 'a complete fabrication' without offering a counter-account.
  • Trump has floated military force as the alternative to diplomacy — threatening action against Oman if it cooperates with Iran, and warning he may 'finish the job' if current offers remain unsatisfactory.
  • Despite US claims that Iran is weakened and desperate, the Islamic Republic has not collapsed; Khamenei's son Mojtaba has assumed leadership and the Revolutionary Guard remains intact, complicating Washington's leverage calculus.

The negotiating table between Washington and Tehran exists in name only. When Trump met with his cabinet on Wednesday, he made the American position unambiguous: Iran must hand over its roughly 440 kilograms of enriched uranium, and it will receive nothing in exchange — no sanctions relief, no unfrozen assets, no end to the naval blockade strangling its ports. Tehran has flatly refused, insisting it will not relinquish its nuclear material under any terms resembling those the US has described.

The uranium dispute is only one dimension of a broader impasse. Iran sealed the Strait of Hormuz when the war began in late February — a closure that has sent energy prices climbing and fueled inflation across the globe. Iran proposed joint management of the waterway with Oman; Trump rejected the idea outright and suggested military force might be used against Oman itself if it cooperated with Tehran. The White House also dismissed Iran's account of a draft memorandum on lifting the blockade as 'a complete fabrication,' offering no alternative version of what is actually being negotiated.

The war began on February 28 without direct provocation from Iran. American and Israeli strikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, several senior officials, and hundreds of civilians. Iran responded with missile and drone attacks and closed the strait — yet the government did not fall. Khamenei was succeeded by his son Mojtaba, and the Revolutionary Guard remains the backbone of Iranian power.

A ceasefire took effect on April 8 but has yielded nothing concrete. Trump claimed over the weekend that a deal was nearly finalized; by Wednesday he was saying Iran's offers still fell short. 'We're not satisfied with it, but we will be,' he said, adding that the alternative was to 'finish the job.' Whether either side has genuinely moved toward compromise remains obscured by the competing narratives both are broadcasting to the world.

The negotiating table between Washington and Tehran remains empty in all but name. On Wednesday, as Donald Trump sat down with his cabinet, he made clear that the United States would not budge on what it sees as non-negotiable: Iran must surrender its stockpile of enriched uranium, and it will receive nothing in return—no sanctions relief, no unfrozen assets, no easing of the naval blockade that has choked off its ports.

This hardening of the American position came even as both sides had suggested, just days earlier, that a deal might be within reach. The gap between those optimistic signals and the reality of the negotiating room reveals how far apart the two countries remain on nearly every substantive question. Trump told PBS News that Iran would hand over its roughly 440 kilograms of highly enriched uranium—not as a concession to be rewarded, but as a condition of any agreement at all. He suggested the material would either be shipped to the United States for destruction or, less preferably, destroyed in Iran under joint supervision. Tehran has flatly rejected this demand, insisting it will keep its nuclear material.

The uranium question is only one front in a broader diplomatic stalemate. The two nations are also deadlocked over control of the Strait of Hormuz, the waterway through which more than a fifth of the world's oil passes. Iran closed the strait after the war began in late February, a blockade that has rippled through global energy markets and fueled inflation in the United States itself. On Wednesday, Trump rejected any proposal that would give Iran a role in managing the waterway, even in partnership with Oman. When asked about the possibility, he suggested military force might be necessary: "Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we'll have to blow 'em up."

The White House also moved to discredit Iran's account of what a potential agreement might look like. Iranian state television had reported details of a draft memorandum that would lift the American naval blockade in exchange for allowing commercial shipping through the strait at pre-war levels within 30 days. According to the Iranian account, military vessels would be excluded from the arrangement, and Iran would retain control over the waterway's management in coordination with Oman. The Trump administration dismissed this entirely, calling the Iranian report "a complete fabrication" without offering specifics about what was false or providing its own version of the terms under discussion.

The war itself has been running for more than twelve weeks. It began on February 28 without direct provocation from Iran, according to reporting on the conflict. The initial American and Israeli strikes killed Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, along with several other senior officials and hundreds of civilians. Iran responded with waves of missile and drone attacks across the region and by sealing the strait. Yet despite the scale of the military campaign, the Iranian government did not collapse. Khamenei was succeeded by his son, Mojtaba, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps remains a dominant force in Iran's political and military structure.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that Iran is weakened and desperate to make a deal, that it cannot "out-wait" him no matter how long the conflict stretches. He framed the blockade as a political tactic aimed at undermining his standing before crucial midterm elections, then dismissed the concern: "I don't care about the midterms." He also suggested that earlier claims of Iranian agreement to transfer uranium to the United States at a leisurely pace were accurate, though Tehran denied making any such commitment more than a month ago.

A temporary ceasefire took effect on April 8, but it has produced no breakthrough. Trump said on Saturday that a deal was being finalized after conversations with regional leaders, yet by Wednesday the administration was still insisting that Iran's current offers fell short. "We're not satisfied with it, but we will be," Trump said. "Either that or we'll have to just finish the job"—a phrase that hung in the air as a barely veiled threat of renewed military action. The question of whether either side has genuinely moved toward compromise remains unanswered, obscured by the competing narratives each is broadcasting to the world.

We're not talking about any easing of sanctions or giving money. They're going to give up their highly enriched uranium, not for sanctions relief.
— Donald Trump, at cabinet meeting
This report from Iranian controlled media is not true and the MOU they 'released' is a complete fabrication.
— White House statement on Iranian proposal
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does Trump keep insisting Iran will get nothing—no sanctions relief, no unfrozen money—when that's usually what brings countries to the table?

Model

Because he's trying to establish that he's not negotiating from weakness. If he offers concessions, it looks like Iran's blockade of the strait is working, that the war hasn't achieved what he wanted. So he's saying Iran has already lost, and now it just has to accept terms.

Inventor

But Iran is still controlling the strait. Oil prices are still high. How is that a position of strength for the US?

Model

It isn't, really. That's the contradiction. He's claiming victory while the blockade persists and the global economy is feeling the pain. The harder he talks, the more it seems like he's trying to convince people—maybe himself—that he's winning.

Inventor

What about the uranium? Why is that the sticking point?

Model

It's symbolic and practical both. If Iran gives up its enriched uranium, it can't build a nuclear weapon quickly. But asking Iran to surrender it for nothing—not even sanctions relief—is asking them to accept permanent weakness. They're saying no.

Inventor

And the Strait of Hormuz? Why does Trump reject any deal that gives Iran a role?

Model

Because accepting that would mean acknowledging Iran has leverage. If Oman and Iran jointly manage it, that's Iran winning something. Trump wants to control it outright, or at least have the US Navy control it. Anything less feels like defeat to him.

Inventor

Is there any actual negotiation happening, or is this just theater?

Model

It's hard to tell. Both sides are broadcasting their positions to domestic audiences and regional allies. The White House calls Iran's proposal fabricated without explaining why. Iran denies agreeing to things Trump says it agreed to. Real negotiators usually work quietly. This is all public contradiction.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Al Jazeera ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ