The US must choose—ceasefire or continued war via Israel
In the span of a single day, a fragile hope was born and nearly extinguished. Hours before a military deadline expired, the United States and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire — a rare diplomatic reprieve brokered by Pakistan — only to watch it fracture almost immediately as Israel launched its largest strikes yet on Lebanon, killing hundreds of civilians and prompting Tehran to close the Strait of Hormuz once more. The episode reveals an enduring tension at the heart of modern conflict: that agreements between great powers mean little when smaller actors retain the will and the weapons to act independently, and that the architecture of peace is only as strong as the restraint of those not seated at the table.
- A last-minute ceasefire between the US and Iran — brokered by Pakistan with just minutes to spare before a military strike deadline — briefly calmed global markets and reopened the Strait of Hormuz, offering a rare moment of relief.
- Within hours, Israel launched its largest coordinated assault of the conflict on Lebanon, killing over 254 civilians in a single day and striking journalists on the ground, shattering the fragile calm before it had taken hold.
- Iran responded by closing the Strait of Hormuz again and issuing a stark ultimatum: Washington must choose between the ceasefire and continued war through Israel — it cannot have both.
- A fundamental dispute over whether Lebanon was ever part of the agreement has become the fault line threatening the entire deal, with the US denying it and Iran insisting it was a core condition.
- Drones and missiles struck Gulf states, explosions were heard in Iranian cities, and 800 vessels remained trapped in the Strait as both delegations prepared — uncertainly — to meet in Islamabad on Saturday.
With less than an hour before Trump's strike deadline expired on Tuesday, the United States and Iran announced a two-week ceasefire that sent immediate shockwaves through global markets — oil prices fell, stock exchanges surged, and the Strait of Hormuz, choked off for weeks, was set to reopen. Pakistan had brokered the deal, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif preparing to host both delegations in Islamabad for talks aimed at a permanent settlement.
The reprieve lasted only hours. Before dawn on Wednesday, Israel launched what it described as its largest coordinated strike of the conflict, hitting residential and commercial areas across Beirut and Lebanon. Lebanese officials counted 254 dead in a single day. An Al Jazeera correspondent was killed in Gaza; two Lebanese journalists died in the strikes. Israel claimed it was targeting Hezbollah commanders, but the scale of the assault raised immediate questions about its scope.
Iran's response was swift. Tehran announced it was closing the Strait of Hormuz again, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a blunt ultimatum: the US must choose between the ceasefire and continued war through Israel. Revolutionary Guards warned their "hand is on the trigger." State media reported Iran would withdraw from the deal entirely if strikes on Lebanon continued.
The central dispute was over Lebanon's inclusion. Iran insisted a Lebanese ceasefire was a core condition of any agreement — part of its ten-point framework. Vice President JD Vance flatly denied Washington had ever agreed to this. Prime Minister Netanyahu declared the ceasefire explicitly excluded Hezbollah and that Israel would continue striking them.
The diplomatic structure began to buckle. France's Macron called both Trump and Iran's president, insisting any credible ceasefire must cover Lebanon. European leaders issued a joint demand. Pakistan's Sharif pleaded for restraint. But drones and missiles were already striking Gulf states — Qatar intercepted fire, Kuwait reported attacks on petroleum facilities, Saudi Arabia shot down nine drones. Eight hundred vessels remained trapped in the Strait, with shipping sources reporting threatening messages from those claiming to represent the Iranian Navy.
Both delegations remained scheduled to meet in Islamabad on Saturday, but the trust that had barely existed before the ceasefire was already in tatters. What had seemed like a breakthrough just hours earlier had become something else entirely: a test of whether any diplomatic framework could survive the first real crisis — and whether either great power could actually enforce restraint on the allies it could not fully control.
The clock was running out. With less than an hour to spare before Trump's deadline to strike Iran expired on Tuesday, the United States and Iran announced a two-week ceasefire. It was a last-minute reprieve that sent shockwaves through global markets—oil prices plummeted, stock exchanges surged, and for a brief moment, the region exhaled. As part of the agreement, Tehran committed to reopening the Strait of Hormuz, the critical waterway that had been choked off for weeks, strangling global commerce. Pakistan had brokered the deal, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif hosting delegations from both sides for talks scheduled to begin in Islamabad on Friday, aimed at hammering out a permanent settlement.
But the ceasefire lasted only hours. On Wednesday morning, before dawn had fully broken, Israel launched what it called its largest coordinated strike of the entire conflict, hammering Lebanon with waves of attacks across residential neighborhoods and commercial districts in and around Beirut. The death toll climbed quickly—254 people killed in a single day, according to Lebanese officials. An Al Jazeera correspondent was struck down in Gaza. Two Lebanese journalists were killed. The strikes came without warning, hitting dense civilian areas. Israel claimed it was targeting Hezbollah commanders, but the scale and indiscriminate nature of the assault suggested something broader was underway.
Iran's response was swift and furious. Within hours of the Israeli strikes, Tehran announced it was closing the Strait of Hormuz again, reversing the reopening it had just agreed to. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a stark ultimatum: the United States had to choose between the ceasefire and continued war through Israel. "The Iran–U.S. Ceasefire terms are clear and explicit: the U.S. must choose—ceasefire or continued war via Israel. It cannot have both," he wrote. Iranian forces began identifying targets for retaliation. State media reported that Iran would withdraw from the ceasefire entirely if the strikes on Lebanon continued. Revolutionary Guards issued warnings that their "hand is on the trigger," ready to respond with greater force.
The disagreement over Lebanon's status became the fault line threatening to collapse the entire agreement. Iran insisted that a ceasefire in Lebanon was a fundamental condition of any deal—it was part of Tehran's ten-point framework for ending the war. The United States, through Vice President JD Vance, flatly denied this. Vance said Washington had never agreed to include Lebanon in the ceasefire, though he added that Israel had agreed to "check itself" in the country. Netanyahu went further, declaring that the ceasefire explicitly excluded Hezbollah and that Israel would "continue to strike them." He said Israel remained prepared to "return to combat at any moment required" and that "our finger remains on the trigger."
The fragile diplomatic structure began to crack under the weight of these contradictions. France's President Macron called both Trump and Iran's President Pezeshkian, insisting that any credible ceasefire must cover Lebanon. European leaders issued a joint statement demanding that the truce apply across all areas of confrontation. Pakistan's Prime Minister Sharif pleaded with all parties to exercise restraint and respect the two-week pause "so that diplomacy can take a lead role." But the damage was already done. Iran's state media reported that air defenses had been activated in Tehran and other cities. Explosions were heard in Isfahan. Drones and missiles were launched at Gulf states—Qatar intercepted incoming fire, Kuwait reported attacks on petroleum facilities, Saudi Arabia said it had shot down nine drones.
Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz remained a flashpoint. Shipping sources reported that vessels had received threatening messages claiming to be from the Iranian Navy, warning that any ship attempting passage without Tehran's permission would be "targeted and destroyed." Eight hundred vessels were still trapped in the waterway, unable to move. The White House demanded that Iran reopen it "immediately, quickly, and safely," calling any closure "completely unacceptable." But Iran's Ports and Maritime Organization made clear that any passage would require coordination with the Revolutionary Guards.
The two delegations were still scheduled to meet in Islamabad on Saturday—Vance leading the American team, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Araghchi heading Iran's delegation. But the trust that had barely existed before the ceasefire was now in tatters. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said he saw no way to bridge the positions of the US and Iran. A senior US official dismissed Iran's published ten-point ceasefire plan as not the actual agreement, saying the real terms would be negotiated "behind closed doors." Trump himself warned of 50 percent tariffs on any country supplying weapons to Iran. The ceasefire, which had seemed like a breakthrough just hours earlier, had become a test of whether either side could actually enforce restraint on its allies—and whether the diplomatic process could survive the first real crisis.
Citas Notables
The Iran–U.S. Ceasefire terms are clear and explicit: the U.S. must choose—ceasefire or continued war via Israel. It cannot have both.— Iran Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi
We are prepared to return to combat at any moment required. Our finger remains on the trigger. This is not the end of the campaign, but a step along the way to achieving all our objectives.— Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Why did the ceasefire collapse so quickly? Was Israel always planning to strike Lebanon?
It's not clear if Israel planned it from the start, but the ceasefire agreement itself was ambiguous about Lebanon. Iran thought it was included; the US said it wasn't. That gap was always going to be a problem.
So both sides signed something they understood differently?
Essentially, yes. And when Israel moved on Lebanon immediately after, Iran saw it as a betrayal of the deal's spirit. They felt the US had lied.
What does Iran actually want from these talks in Pakistan?
A permanent end to the war, but with Lebanon protected. They won't accept a ceasefire that leaves Hezbollah exposed to Israeli strikes. It's a red line for them.
And what does the US want?
Trump wants a deal that constrains Iran's nuclear program and regional activities. But he's also letting Israel do what it wants in Lebanon, which contradicts the ceasefire terms.
Can this be fixed in Islamabad?
Only if someone gives ground. Either Iran accepts that Lebanon isn't covered, or the US forces Israel to stop. Right now, neither side is willing to move.
What happens if the ceasefire breaks completely?
We go back to war. The Strait of Hormuz stays closed. Oil prices spike again. And the region slides back into the cycle that just killed hundreds of people in Lebanon alone.