Two Italian divers recovered from Maldives cave after deadly accident

Five people died in the diving accident including four Italian divers and one Maldivian rescue diver; two bodies remain unrecovered.
No one knew anything? It makes me laugh.
The father of one deceased diver challenges the university's claim it didn't authorize the cave expedition.

In the waters off Vaavu atoll in the Maldives, five lives were lost when a team of Italian researchers descended into an underwater cave system that plunged beyond the boundaries of their authorized mission. Two of the four Italian divers have now been recovered from the cave's deepest chamber by Finnish specialists, while questions surface about the line between scientific ambition and institutional accountability. The tragedy asks an ancient question anew: when knowledge is pursued at the edge of the known world, who bears responsibility for what lies beyond?

  • Five people are dead — four Italian researchers and a Maldivian rescue diver who lost his life trying to save others — after a dive into a 60-meter cave system went catastrophically wrong.
  • Finnish specialist divers completed a grueling two-hour operation to extract two bodies from the cave's third and deepest chamber, with two more still entombed inside.
  • The dive exceeded its authorized scope: the team held a permit for 50-meter depths but never disclosed plans to enter a cave system, and the University of Genoa says it sanctioned no deep-sea diving at all.
  • Rough seas and a yellow weather warning were in effect the day of the accident, adding environmental pressure to an already high-risk operation.
  • The deceased researcher's husband has publicly challenged the university's distancing, suggesting the institution was well aware of the work being conducted in its name.
  • Recovery efforts resume Wednesday, with investigators still working to determine the precise cause and to untangle where personal initiative ended and institutional responsibility began.

Two Italian divers have been brought to the surface from the depths of an underwater cave in the Maldives, following a technically demanding two-hour recovery operation conducted by specialist divers from Finland. The two were retrieved from the third and innermost chamber of a cave system known locally as "shark cave," which descends to 60 meters near Vaavu atoll. Two more bodies remain inside, with recovery efforts set to resume Wednesday.

The accident last Thursday claimed five lives in total. The first victim, identified as diving instructor Gianluca Benedetti, was recovered shortly after the initial incident. A Maldivian rescue diver then died during the search operation on Saturday. The remaining four missing divers were located by the Finnish team on Monday in the cave's deepest chamber. The two now recovered are being transported to the capital, Malé, for identification.

The dive was led by Monica Montefalcone, an associate professor of ecology at the University of Genoa, alongside research fellow Muriel Oddenino. Also in the cave were Montefalcone's daughter Giorgia Sommacal and recent graduate Federico Gualtieri — all part of a mission studying climate change's effects on tropical biodiversity. The group held a permit for dives to 50 meters, but their proposal made no mention of cave exploration.

The University of Genoa has stated it did not authorize deep-sea diving for this mission, describing the dive as conducted "in a personal capacity" and outside the scope of the approved research. The university had suspended authorization for scientific dives in early 2024 following new ministerial guidelines. Maldivian authorities confirmed the permit did not cover cave diving, and rough weather conditions on the day of the accident may have been a contributing factor.

Montefalcone's husband, Carlo Sommacal — who lost both his wife and daughter — has contested the university's account, arguing that the institution was long aware of and reliant upon her fieldwork in the Maldives. His grief-stricken challenge to the official narrative captures the painful complexity at the heart of this tragedy: the difficulty of drawing clean lines of responsibility when lives are lost in the pursuit of science.

The bodies of two Italian divers have been brought to the surface after a recovery operation in the Maldives that took two hours and required specialist divers from Finland to navigate one of the world's most challenging underwater environments. The two were pulled from the third chamber of an underwater cave system known locally as "shark cave," which plunges to depths of 60 meters. They are among five people who died in the accident that occurred last week near Vaavu atoll, and two bodies remain inside the cave.

The first recovery came shortly after the initial accident on Thursday, when a diver identified by Italian media as Gianluca Benedetti, a boat operations manager and diving instructor, was brought to the surface. Then on Saturday, the tragedy deepened when a Maldivian rescue diver died during the search operation itself. The four missing divers were eventually located by the Finnish team on Monday, positioned in the chamber furthest from the cave's entrance. The two bodies now recovered are being transported to Male, the capital, for identification.

The operation itself presented extraordinary technical challenges. The cave entrance sits at 47 meters depth, but the various internal chambers exist at different depths, creating a complex three-dimensional maze in near-total darkness. The Finnish specialists brought the two bodies to a depth of 30 meters, at which point local coastguard divers took over the final stages of the ascent. Officials have described the recovery as complex not only because of the depth but because of the confined spaces and severely limited visibility inside the cave system. The mission to retrieve the remaining two bodies is scheduled to resume on Wednesday, with officials expressing hope they will be brought up the same day.

What emerges from the details of the dive is a picture of scientific work conducted outside its authorized parameters. The team was led by Monica Montefalcone, an associate professor of ecology at the University of Genoa, along with research fellow Muriel Oddenino. They were investigating the effects of climate change on tropical biodiversity. Two other divers in the cave were Montefalcone's daughter Giorgia Sommacal, a student at Genoa, and recent graduate Federico Gualtieri. The group held a permit to dive to 50 meters depth, but their proposal made no mention of exploring a cave system.

The University of Genoa has stated that it did not authorize any deep-sea diving as part of the research mission. A university spokesperson told the BBC that requests submitted to Maldivian authorities "were evidently made outside the scope of the mission authorised by the university," and that the dive was carried out "in a personal capacity." The university suspended authorization for all scientific dives in March 2024, following a ministerial decree that month establishing new guidelines for underwater research. Officials are now developing an internal protocol to govern future operations in compliance with those regulations.

A Maldivian government spokesperson confirmed that the team had a permit for 50-meter dives but had not disclosed the cave in their proposal. The weather on Thursday, when the accident occurred, was rough enough that a yellow warning had been issued for passenger boats and fishermen. The conditions may have contributed to what happened, though investigators are still working to determine the precise cause.

Carlo Sommacal, the father of one of the deceased divers and husband of the expedition leader, has pushed back against the university's characterization of the dive as unauthorized. Speaking to La Repubblica newspaper, he pointed out that his wife Monica is recognized internationally for her scientific work on corals in the region. "There are hundreds of graduate students writing theses on the Maldives using the data they gather together with Monica, or that Monica gathered," he said. "And no one knew anything? It makes me laugh." The tension between the university's institutional position and the family's defense of the research underscores the complexity of assigning responsibility when tragedy occurs in the pursuit of scientific knowledge.

The requests submitted to the Maldivian authorities were evidently made outside the scope of the mission authorised by the university.
— University of Genoa spokesperson
Monica is the person who has the most scientific literature on those corals in the world. There are hundreds of graduate students writing theses on the Maldives using the data they gather together with Monica, or that Monica gathered. And no one knew anything?
— Carlo Sommacal, father of deceased diver Giorgia Sommacal
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does it matter that the university says it didn't authorize this dive?

Model

Because it suggests the team may have been operating outside safety protocols and oversight structures that exist for exactly this reason. If the university had known, they might have required additional safety measures or prohibited the cave dive altogether.

Inventor

But the father of one of the victims seems to suggest the university knew what Monica Montefalcone was doing.

Model

He's saying her reputation and work are so well-known that it strains credibility to claim ignorance. But there's a difference between knowing someone's general research interests and formally approving a specific high-risk operation. The university's point is that this particular cave dive wasn't part of what they authorized.

Inventor

What makes this cave so dangerous?

Model

It's 60 meters deep with multiple chambers at varying depths, almost no visibility, and extremely confined spaces. You're essentially navigating a three-dimensional maze in darkness while managing your air supply and decompression. One mistake compounds quickly.

Inventor

The weather was rough that day?

Model

Yes. A yellow warning had been issued for boats and fishermen. That's not a prohibition, but it's a signal that conditions are hazardous. Whether that played a role in what happened, we don't yet know.

Inventor

What will the recovered bodies tell investigators?

Model

They may show signs of what went wrong—equipment failure, disorientation, panic, nitrogen narcosis at depth. The positioning of the bodies might indicate whether they were separated, whether they ran out of air, whether there was a collision. These details could point toward the cause.

Inventor

And the two bodies still inside?

Model

They remain in the deepest chamber. Retrieving them requires the same dangerous operation, which is why it's scheduled to resume Wednesday. Each recovery is a separate mission.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ