Every American president eventually confronts the same ancient paradox: that the capacity to win battles is not the same as the wisdom to win peace. President Trump, now navigating the friction between tactical strikes against Iran and the elusive goal of durable regional stability, finds himself in the long company of predecessors who learned that firepower can topple governments but cannot build them. The lessons of Afghanistan and Iraq — conflicts that began in triumph and ended in exhaustion — hang over the current moment as a reminder that military dominance and strategic transformation a
The New York Times
· Jul 17, 2026
· security
· 1 min de lectura
High
Verificación: Verificado
Trump Grapples With Firepower's Limits in Pursuit of Lasting Victory
◉
Politics & Governance
10062 artículos relacionados
Burnham's first day: Cabinet surprises and policy ambitions unveiled
The Guardian · 100% coincidencia
Johnson's SAVE Act strategy clears House Rules Committee, advancing GO…
Fox News · 99% coincidencia
Lindsey Graham's Sister Enters South Carolina Senate Race With Trump's…
CBS News · 99% coincidencia
Andy Burnham becomes UK's seventh PM in a decade, vows major reforms
Deutsche Welle · 99% coincidencia
Burnham takes office as papers debate Labour's new direction
BBC News · 99% coincidencia
Cobertura Relacionada
The Guardian · Jul 21
Holocaust survivors warn of 'disturbing parallels' as antisemitism rises in Australia
Australian Holocaust survivors' leader George Foster told a royal commission that rising antisemitism shows disturbing p…
The Guardian · Jul 21 Burnham's first day: Cabinet surprises and policy ambitions unveiledAndy Burnham officially became UK prime minister, pledging his government would be a 'circuit breaker for Britain' with …
Deutsche Welle · Jul 21 UK PM Burnham removes VAT from electricity bills, funds move by scrapping Digital IDNew UK PM Andy Burnham cuts VAT on household electricity from October 1, saving households £45 annually. The measure is …
BBC News · Jul 21 Burnham takes office as papers debate Labour's new directionAndy Burnham takes office as UK prime minister, replacing Keir Starmer. Media coverage reflects mixed reactions to his c…
Sesgo y Encuadre
⚖
Article uses measured language comparing Trump to predecessors on military strategy, with neutral framing of a common governance challenge across administrations.
Bias Direction
center
Confidence
MED
Comparative historical analysis that normalizes Trump's challenges by situating them within a pattern of presidential struggles, reducing partisan critique through universalization.
Grapples with
Firepower's Limits
Pursuit of Lasting Victory
Military strategists' specific recommendations
International allies' assessments of strategy
Congressional perspectives on military objectives
Ground-level military personnel experiences
Affected civilian populations' viewpoints
Impacto Geopolítico
🌎
Trump faces the enduring strategic challenge of converting tactical military victories into sustainable geopolitical gains, a pattern consistent with recent U.S. military interventions.
Escalation Risk
moderate
Confidence
MED
Middle East
Afghanistan
Iraq
Iran
United States
The article suggests continued U.S. military engagement without clear strategic resolution, potentially weakening American soft power and credibility while creating vacuums that rival powers (Russia, China) may exploit in contested regions.
Mirrors the post-2003 Iraq War and post-2001 Afghanistan campaigns, where initial military dominance failed to produce stable political outcomes, ultimately requiring costly long-term commitments or withdrawal.
Lente Económico
📈
Military strategy challenges have limited economic returns; sustained conflicts create fiscal burdens without clear strategic/economic gains, affecting defense spending and budget priorities.
Market Signal
bearish
Confidence
MED
Defense and aerospace
Government spending and budgeting
Energy (geopolitical risk)
Financial markets (risk premium)
Infrastructure (domestic investment opportunity cost)
Prolonged military engagements increase government debt and deficit spending, potentially leading to higher inflation, interest rates, and reduced domestic investment in healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Consumer purchasing power may be pressured.
Likely congressional debate over defense budget allocation, potential pressure for fiscal restraint, possible reassessment of military intervention doctrine, and increased focus on exit strategies and cost-benefit analysis for future military commitments.