Spain's Failed Work-Week Reduction Bill Hits Women, Service Workers Hardest

Three million part-time workers, predominantly women, lose potential wage increases and improved working conditions from the failed legislation.
Three million part-time workers will not see their wages rise.
The rejection of Spain's work-week reduction bill leaves the country's lowest-paid employees without the automatic salary increases the law would have triggered.

Three million part-time workers—73% women—would have received automatic salary increases under the rejected law, making them the most directly affected group. The bill would have benefited workers across construction, hospitality, manufacturing, and retail sectors, with public polling showing 80% of Catalans support the measure.

  • Three million part-time workers in Spain; 73% are women
  • 12 million salaried workers would have benefited from the 37.5-hour cap
  • 80% of Catalans support the measure, even among opposition voters
  • Business groups estimate 6% increase in average labor costs
  • PP, Vox, and Junts have enough votes to block the bill

Spain's Congress is poised to reject a bill reducing maximum work hours to 37.5 weekly, disappointing 12 million workers. Women, service sector employees, and low-wage workers face the greatest losses from the measure's failure.

Spain's Congress is preparing to reject a bill that would have capped the maximum work week at 37.5 hours—a defeat that will reverberate most sharply through the lives of women, service workers, and the lowest-paid employees across the country. The conservative PP, far-right Vox, and the Catalan nationalist Junts party command enough votes to block the measure, dealing a blow to the government, which had positioned this as its flagship labor initiative, and to the unions that backed it. Around 12 million salaried workers stood to benefit from the reduction, but not all would have felt the impact equally.

The three million Spaniards working part-time jobs would have experienced the most direct change. Under the bill as negotiated between the Labor Ministry and unions, lowering the standard reference from 40 hours to 37.5 would have automatically raised hourly wages for these workers—they would have earned more per hour for the same work. Three-quarters of Spain's part-time workforce are women, many of them cleaning office buildings, delivering food, supervising school cafeterias, tutoring students, or working in hospitality. For them, the law represented not just fewer hours but a tangible pay increase without requiring employers to hire additional staff.

The reach of the bill extended far beyond part-time workers. According to Labor Ministry data, 12.6 percent of salaried employees covered by collective agreements already work fewer than 37.5 hours, mostly under company-specific contracts. The remaining workers—across construction, hospitality, manufacturing, retail, and office work—would have seen their hours reduced to varying degrees. In Catalonia alone, roughly two million employees would have been affected. The pattern was uneven across regions: hospitality workers in Navarre and Gipuzkoa already had 37.5-hour weeks locked in, while their counterparts in Barcelona and Girona worked 40. Construction, manufacturing, and communications companies were among the heaviest users of overtime, making them candidates for the most significant adjustments.

Business organizations have greeted the likely rejection with satisfaction. The Spanish Confederation of Business Organizations, along with regional employers' groups, spent months opposing the measure, citing labor cost increases. One small-business association estimated that reducing hours by law would raise average labor costs by six percent—a figure that animated much of the opposition. For large employers, the math was straightforward: fewer hours meant either hiring more workers or paying existing ones more for the same output. Neither option appealed.

Vice President Yolanda Díaz, who leads the left-wing Sumar party and championed the bill as her signature achievement this term, has already signaled that Wednesday's defeat will not be the end. She plans to reintroduce the legislation before the next general election, betting that public opinion will eventually force reluctant lawmakers to reckon with the measure. Polling from the Catalan Studies Center shows that eight in ten Catalans support the reduction, and even among voters of the PP, Vox, and Junts—the parties voting against it—more people favor the bill than oppose it. Díaz has repeatedly said the opposing parties will "expose themselves" by voting no, framing the rejection as a political liability for those who block a popular reform.

What hangs in the balance is not abstract. Three million part-time workers, most of them women, will not see their wages rise. Service workers in hospitality and retail will continue working the hours their employers set. The lowest-paid employees across Spain will not benefit from the automatic wage adjustment the bill would have triggered. The defeat is clean and final for now, but the political battle over whether Spaniards work 40 hours or 37.5 is far from settled.

Vice President Yolanda Díaz plans to reintroduce the legislation before the next general election, betting that public opinion will eventually force reluctant lawmakers to reckon with the measure.
— Yolanda Díaz, Vice President and Sumar party leader
Business organizations have greeted the likely rejection with satisfaction, citing labor cost increases as their primary concern.
— Spanish Confederation of Business Organizations and regional employers' groups
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does this bill matter so much to part-time workers specifically?

Model

Because part-time work is how employers keep wages low. If you're paid by the hour and work 20 hours a week, you earn less than someone working 40. The bill would have changed the hourly rate itself—the reference point would shift down, so employers would have to pay more per hour to maintain the same total. It's a backdoor wage increase.

Inventor

And that's why three-quarters of part-time workers are women?

Model

Part-time work is often where women end up—caregiving responsibilities, inflexible schedules, the jobs that don't demand full-time commitment. Cleaning, food service, school monitoring. So a law that raises part-time wages directly helps women.

Inventor

But the business groups say it costs six percent more. Is that wrong?

Model

It's probably accurate. The question is whether that cost is acceptable. The government and unions said yes—it's an investment in living standards. Business groups said no—it's an unaffordable burden. Both are being honest about the math; they just disagree on the priority.

Inventor

Why does Díaz think she can pass it next time if it's failing now?

Model

Public opinion. Eight in ten Catalans support it. Even voters of the parties blocking it favor the measure. She's betting that if she keeps pushing, the political cost of opposition will eventually outweigh the business lobby's pressure.

Inventor

So this is really about who has power in the room—workers or employers?

Model

Exactly. Right now, employers have the votes. But Díaz is trying to shift the ground so that opposing the bill becomes politically toxic. It's a long game.

Contáctanos FAQ