Swedish court hears case of man accused of forcing wife into sex trafficking

Woman subjected to systematic sexual exploitation and coercion with approximately 120 forced sexual encounters over 27 months, causing severe psychological and physical harm.
He treated her like an ATM and sold her like merchandise
The victim's lawyer describing how the defendant weaponized his marriage for profit and control.

Em uma cidade do norte da Suécia, um tribunal examina o caso de um homem de 62 anos acusado de transformar o vínculo mais íntimo — o casamento — em instrumento de exploração sistemática. Durante mais de dois anos, segundo a promotoria, ele teria submetido a própria esposa a encontros sexuais pagos com cerca de 120 homens, lucrando sobre o sofrimento dela. O caso coloca em evidência como a violência doméstica pode assumir formas calculadas e invisíveis, escondidas atrás de portas fechadas e relações de confiança corrompidas.

  • A promotora pediu dez anos de prisão, descrevendo o esquema como cruel e metódico — anúncios online, encontros organizados, supervisão direta e coerção para atos sexuais filmados.
  • A vítima teria sido forçada a se envolver com aproximadamente 120 homens ao longo de 27 meses, acumulando danos psicológicos e físicos profundos enquanto o marido lucrava com cada encontro.
  • A advogada da vítima requereu indenização de 1,1 milhão de coroas suecas, afirmando que o réu tratou a esposa como um caixa eletrônico e a vendeu como mercadoria.
  • O réu nega todas as acusações — incluindo lenocínio qualificado e oito contagens de estupro — e a defesa apresenta seus argumentos finais em 26 de maio, com veredicto esperado logo em seguida.

Um tribunal na cidade de Härnösand, no norte da Suécia, analisa o caso de um homem de 62 anos acusado de explorar sexualmente a própria esposa de forma sistemática e lucrativa. Na segunda-feira, a promotora Ida Annerstedt pediu uma pena de dez anos de prisão, descrevendo o esquema como implacável e calculado.

Segundo as acusações, o réu criou anúncios online para atrair clientes, organizou e supervisionou os encontros sexuais, e pressionou a esposa a se expor em câmera para ampliar os negócios. O esquema teria gerado renda considerável ao longo de mais de dois anos — entre agosto de 2022 e outubro de 2025 — durante os quais a mulher viveu em estado de vulnerabilidade constante.

O homem responde por lenocínio qualificado e oito acusações de estupro. A advogada da vítima, Silvia Ingolfsdottir, solicitou indenização de 1,1 milhão de coroas suecas, declarando à emissora SVT que o réu tratou a esposa como um caixa eletrônico. Grande parte do julgamento ocorreu a portas fechadas, para preservar a privacidade da vítima.

A defesa, representada por Martina Michaelsdotter, nega todas as acusações e apresenta seus argumentos finais na terça-feira. O veredicto é esperado em breve. O caso expõe um padrão perturbador em que a pessoa mais próxima da vítima se torna o principal agente de seu sofrimento.

A Swedish court in the northern city of Härnösand is hearing the case of a 62-year-old man accused of systematically exploiting his wife for sex and profit. On Monday, the prosecutor asked for a ten-year prison sentence, alleging that over roughly three years, the defendant forced his wife into paid sexual encounters with approximately 120 different men.

Prosecutor Ida Annerstedt described the exploitation as ruthless and calculated. According to the charges, the man created online advertisements to solicit clients, organized the encounters himself, supervised the sexual acts, and pressured his wife to perform on camera to attract more business. The scheme generated substantial income. Annerstedt told the court that the scale of the crimes, the profits involved, and the systematic nature of the abuse constituted an act of profound cruelty against the woman.

The defendant faces charges of qualified pimping—a crime involving the exploitation of prostitution for financial gain—as well as eight separate counts of rape. Swedish law treats the buying and facilitating of sexual services as illegal, though selling sex itself is not a crime. The victim's lawyer, Silvia Ingolfsdottir, has requested compensation of 1.1 million Swedish crowns, roughly 580,000 Brazilian reais. In a statement to the state broadcaster SVT, Ingolfsdottir said the defendant treated his wife like an ATM and sold her as if she were merchandise.

The alleged crimes occurred between August 2022 and October 2025—a span of more than two and a half years during which the woman lived in a state of vulnerability, according to prosecutors. Much of the trial has been conducted behind closed doors, a measure often taken in cases involving sexual exploitation to protect the victim's privacy and dignity.

The defendant's lawyer, Martina Michaelsdotter, has maintained that her client denies all charges. The defense is expected to present its closing arguments on Tuesday, with a verdict likely to follow shortly after. The case reflects broader patterns of intimate partner abuse and sexual exploitation, where the person closest to a victim becomes the architect of their harm.

The facts had considerable magnitude, generated significant profits, and constituted ruthless exploitation of the victim
— Prosecutor Ida Annerstedt
He treated her like an ATM and sold her as merchandise
— Victim's lawyer Silvia Ingolfsdottir, to SVT
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does Swedish law make it illegal to buy sex but not to sell it?

Model

It's a deliberate choice—the idea is to criminalize demand rather than the person in the transaction. The thinking is that if you remove the market, you reduce exploitation. But it also means that someone like this man's wife, even though she was being coerced, technically wasn't breaking the law by being forced into it.

Inventor

How does a spouse even do this to another person for over two years without the victim finding a way out?

Model

Control operates on many levels. Financial dependence, isolation, psychological manipulation, the shame victims often internalize. The prosecutor's language—calling it ruthless—suggests this wasn't passive. He was actively managing her, watching her, pushing her to perform. That kind of constant surveillance and coercion is paralyzing.

Inventor

The number 120 men—does that number tell us something specific about the duration or the intensity?

Model

It suggests frequency. Over 27 months, that's roughly four or five encounters per month. Not random. Organized. Advertised. He was running it like a business, which is partly why the charge is qualified pimping rather than something else. The systematization is what makes it so damaging legally and morally.

Inventor

What happens if he's convicted? Is ten years the likely sentence?

Model

The prosecutor asked for ten years, but courts don't always grant what's requested. What matters more is that if convicted, he'll have a record for sexual exploitation and rape. The compensation request—580,000 reais—is meant to acknowledge the harm, though money can't repair what happened to her.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Meio Norte ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ