Private lobby linked to TotalEnergies targets Brazil's strategic energy auction

A billion-dollar struggle over the shape of Brazil's energy future
The dispute over the capacity auction has evolved from technical debate into a high-stakes battle between government and private interests.

No coração do debate energético brasileiro, o governo Lula defende um leilão de capacidade como escudo contra apagões em uma era de renováveis intermitentes, enquanto interesses privados bilionários — reunidos em torno de Casa dos Ventos e TotalEnergies — trabalham para redirecionar o país rumo ao armazenamento em baterias. O que parece uma disputa técnica sobre estabilidade da rede é, em essência, uma batalha sobre quem molda — e quem lucra com — a transição energética do Brasil. Cada civilização que expande sua capacidade produtiva enfrenta este momento: quando o futuro ainda não chegou, mas o presente já não basta.

  • O sistema elétrico brasileiro depende cada vez mais de fontes renováveis que somem ao anoitecer ou oscilam com o vento, tornando o risco de apagões uma ameaça concreta sem capacidade firme de reserva.
  • Empresas como Casa dos Ventos sofrem perdas crescentes com o corte forçado de geração renovável, e a TotalEnergies — que investiu US$ 550 milhões no setor — vê suas projeções financeiras se deteriorarem a cada curtailment.
  • Um lobby bem articulado, com presença no Congresso por meio do deputado Danilo Forte, pressiona para bloquear ou atrasar o leilão de capacidade e abrir caminho para um leilão de baterias mais favorável ao setor renovável.
  • Um tribunal federal rejeitou pedido de suspensão do leilão, dando ao governo Lula uma vitória provisória — mas novos recursos no Tribunal de Contas mantêm a disputa juridicamente viva.
  • O desfecho desta batalha definirá não apenas a matriz elétrica do Brasil, mas a distribuição de poder e lucro em uma economia que se eletrifica aceleradamente.

O governo brasileiro se prepara para um confronto em torno de um leilão que considera indispensável para o futuro energético do país. O Leilão de Reserva de Capacidade de 2026 foi concebido para garantir estabilidade à rede elétrica em um momento em que usinas solares e eólicas se multiplicam — mas não entregam energia de forma constante. Sem fontes despacháveis que possam ser acionadas sob demanda, o sistema corre o risco de colapsar nos momentos de pico. O Ministério de Minas e Energia e o Operador Nacional do Sistema defendem que o país precisa contratar capacidade firme agora, antes que a demanda supere a oferta.

Do outro lado da disputa está um lobby privado poderoso. O bilionário Mário Araripe, à frente da Casa dos Ventos, e a gigante francesa TotalEnergies — que pagou US$ 550 milhões por uma fatia da empresa em 2022 — têm razões financeiras concretas para preferir um caminho diferente. O curtailment, prática que força o desligamento de usinas renováveis quando a rede não absorve toda a geração, corrói diretamente os retornos do setor. A solução que defendem são as baterias de armazenamento em larga escala, capazes de absorver o excesso de energia renovável e liberá-lo quando necessário — e um leilão de baterias seria muito mais lucrativo para esses atores do que um leilão de capacidade térmica.

A oposição ao leilão ganhou forma no Congresso, com o deputado Danilo Forte intensificando críticas ao projeto governamental. Dentro do setor, a percepção é de que sua atuação está alinhada aos interesses econômicos das empresas renováveis. O governo, porém, não recuou: um tribunal federal rejeitou o pedido de suspensão do leilão, o que o Palácio do Planalto interpretou como uma vitória para a segurança energética. Ainda assim, novos recursos tramitam no Tribunal de Contas, mantendo a incerteza sobre a realização do certame.

O que começou como um debate técnico sobre a estabilidade da rede tornou-se uma disputa de bilhões sobre quem define — e quem lucra com — a transição energética brasileira. De um lado, um governo convicto de que a capacidade térmica é necessária para evitar apagões. Do outro, um setor privado apostando que as baterias são o futuro — e que bloquear o leilão forçará a mão do Estado.

Brazil's government is bracing for a fight over an energy auction it considers essential to the country's future. The 2026 Capacity Reserve Auction, or LRCAP, is meant to secure the grid against blackouts as solar and wind farms proliferate across the nation. But a well-funded private lobby—led by billionaire Mário Araripe and backed by French energy giant TotalEnergies—is working behind the scenes to block or delay it, pushing instead for battery storage solutions that would benefit their own bottom line.

The technical argument for the auction is straightforward. Brazil's electrical system has grown dependent on intermittent renewable sources. Solar generation vanishes at dusk. Wind output fluctuates. Without reliable baseload power sources that can ramp up quickly when demand spikes, the grid risks instability. The Ministry of Mines and Energy and the National System Operator both argue that the country needs to contract for firm, dispatchable capacity—thermal plants and other sources that can be called upon on demand—to maintain stability over the next several years. The government views the auction as central to that strategy.

But the renewable energy sector faces a different problem: curtailment. When the grid has too much power flowing in, or when transmission lines can't handle the load, the system operator orders wind and solar farms to shut down, even when the sun is shining and wind is blowing. This happens with increasing frequency, especially in the Northeast, where renewable capacity has exploded. For companies like Casa dos Ventos, curtailment cuts directly into revenue and investor returns. The solution they champion is battery storage—massive installations that can absorb excess renewable generation and release it when needed, eliminating the need for forced shutdowns.

The financial stakes are enormous. In 2022, TotalEnergies paid $550 million for a 34 percent stake in Casa dos Ventos, with additional payments tied to how well the company's renewable assets perform. As curtailment has worsened, those financial projections have darkened. Inside the energy sector, people understand that reducing the damage from curtailment has become a strategic priority for both TotalEnergies and Casa dos Ventos. Battery storage is their answer—and a battery auction scheduled for 2026 would be far more lucrative than a capacity auction that brings thermal plants online.

The opposition has taken shape in the halls of Congress. Deputy Danilo Forte, a longtime ally of the wind energy sector from Ceará, has intensified his criticism of the capacity auction, working against what the Ministry of Mines and Energy considers a cornerstone of national energy strategy. Sector insiders see his efforts as aligned with the economic interests of Casa dos Ventos and other renewable companies. The perception is that the goal is to weaken or delay the capacity auction to accelerate battery storage solutions that would benefit the renewable sector.

The government has not backed down. Officials argue that while batteries will play a role in Brazil's energy future, the country cannot wait for storage technology to mature. Electricity demand is growing rapidly. The economy is electrifying. Renewable capacity keeps expanding. Without additional firm capacity contracted now, the risk of power shortages during peak hours grows real. A federal court recently rejected a request to suspend the auction, a decision the Lula administration interpreted as a victory for energy security and regulatory predictability. But the fight is far from over. Other legal challenges are being pursued through institutions like the Court of Accounts, threatening to derail the auction even after the court's ruling.

What began as a technical debate about grid stability has become something larger: a billion-dollar struggle over the shape of Brazil's energy future. On one side, a government convinced that thermal capacity is necessary to prevent blackouts. On the other, a powerful private sector betting that batteries are the answer—and that blocking the auction will force the government's hand. The outcome will determine not just how Brazil generates electricity, but who profits from the transition.

The government considers the LRCAP essential to guarantee safe expansion of energy supply and prevent future blackout risks in the interconnected national system
— Ministry of Mines and Energy and National System Operator
TotalEnergies executives have declared publicly that batteries are essential to reduce curtailment effects in Brazil
— TotalEnergies
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why does the government think thermal plants are necessary if Brazil has so much renewable capacity?

Model

Because renewables are intermittent. Solar stops at sunset. Wind fluctuates. When demand peaks in early evening and solar generation collapses, you need something that can turn on instantly. Thermal plants do that. Batteries could eventually, but they're not deployed at scale yet.

Inventor

So the auction is about buying that reliability?

Model

Exactly. The government wants to contract for firm capacity now—thermal, hydro, whatever is dispatchable—to keep the grid stable while renewables continue expanding. It's a transition strategy.

Inventor

And Casa dos Ventos opposes this because?

Model

Because curtailment is already cutting into their profits. When the grid is oversupplied, the system operator orders them to shut down. They lose revenue even though the wind is blowing. Battery storage would solve that problem—store the excess, release it later, no forced shutdowns.

Inventor

TotalEnergies is involved because they own part of Casa dos Ventos?

Model

They own 34 percent, with payments tied to how well the assets perform. As curtailment worsens, those financial projections suffer. So TotalEnergies has a direct financial interest in promoting battery storage over thermal capacity.

Inventor

Is battery storage a bad solution?

Model

No, it's probably part of the answer. But the government's point is that batteries aren't ready at scale yet, and the grid can't wait. You need firm capacity now. The battery auction can happen later, in parallel.

Inventor

So this is really about timing and money?

Model

It's about both. The government sees a grid stability problem that needs solving immediately. The renewable sector sees a revenue problem that batteries would solve, and they have the resources to lobby against the auction. The government won in court, but the fight isn't over.

Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Brasil 247 ↗
Contáctanos FAQ