Pentagon releases fourth batch of UFO files, including Navy pilot's unexplained sighting

Unlike anything I had seen in 28 years of service
A Navy pilot describing an object with unprecedented flight characteristics observed over the Eastern United States in 2019.

For the fourth time under a formal declassification mandate, the Pentagon has drawn back the curtain on decades of military encounters with phenomena that resist explanation — releasing forty files spanning agencies, continents, and eras, from Cold War physicists puzzling over luminous objects above nuclear laboratories to present-day aviators watching something rectangular vanish faster than their cameras could follow. The accounts share a quiet, unsettling consistency: experienced observers, controlled conditions, and an absence of answers. Whether these disclosures ultimately illuminate something genuinely unknown or simply map the outer edges of human perception, they mark a rare institutional acknowledgment that some things witnessed in the sky remain, officially, unexplained.

  • A Navy pilot with 28 years of flight experience filed a report he could not explain — a rectangular object tracked for seconds over the Eastern U.S. before it accelerated beyond the reach of his camera and his comprehension.
  • In 2015, a nuclear weapons facility in Texas went into lockdown as two officers pursued a silent, propulsion-less object through the night sky above one of America's most sensitive installations — and watched it drift north and disappear.
  • The files stretch across time and geography, from 1949 Los Alamos physicists debating 'green fireballs' to 2025 sensor readings over the Yellow Sea, suggesting these encounters are neither new nor confined to any single era or region.
  • The Pentagon has posted all material to its official UAP website and confirmed that more releases are coming, signaling that this is not a one-time gesture but a sustained, structured process of institutional disclosure.
  • The cumulative weight of the batch — forty files, multiple agencies, decades of data — shifts the conversation from isolated anomaly to documented pattern, leaving the question of what that pattern means conspicuously open.

On Friday, the Pentagon released forty files drawn from the archives of the Defense Department, NASA, the CIA, the FBI, and the Energy Department — the fourth batch of unidentified anomalous phenomena records made public under a presidential executive order. The material spans decades and includes documents, videos, audio recordings, and photographs.

Among the most striking accounts is a 2019 report filed by a Navy aviator with nearly three decades of experience. Flying over the Eastern United States with four crew members, he observed an object below his aircraft moving in the opposite direction at high speed. He tracked it for ten to fifteen seconds before activating his recorder. When he zoomed in, the object accelerated out of frame so rapidly he couldn't follow it even at lower magnification. On the ground, the crew reviewed the footage together. The object appeared rectangular. None of them — people with decades of flight experience between them — could identify it.

A separate incident from September 2015 involved Pantex, a Department of Energy nuclear weapons facility near Amarillo, Texas. Two officers on patrol observed an unidentified object enter the airspace above the site. The facility went into lockdown. The officers pursued it by vehicle but couldn't close the distance. When they stopped and observed through binoculars, the object made no sound and showed no visible propulsion system. After one to two minutes, it moved north and vanished.

Other files include a 2020 encounter over the Atlantic, where a Navy weapons systems officer described a dark maroon object roughly twelve to fifteen feet tall that structurally resembled a large, misshapen balloon — though the crew passed it too quickly to confirm. The report was filed using a standardized Navy form for recording unauthorized intrusions into controlled military airspace.

The historical material reaches back to 1949, when physicists and scientists — many of them Manhattan Project veterans — convened in Los Alamos to discuss 'green fireballs' observed over the nuclear laboratory. One theory held they were meteors, but a prominent astronomer present argued that nothing matching the descriptions had ever appeared in documented meteorite cases.

About half the files date from 2010 or later, consisting largely of infrared military footage from locations across the western Pacific, the Atlantic, and the Middle East. The Pentagon confirmed that additional files are being prepared for future release.

The Pentagon opened another window into its archives of unexplained military encounters on Friday, releasing forty files that span decades and agencies—documents, videos, audio recordings, and photographs collected by the Defense Department, NASA, the CIA, the FBI, and the Energy Department. Among them was an account from a Navy aviator with nearly three decades of flight experience who described seeing something that broke the pattern of everything he had encountered in his career.

The pilot's report came from 2019, filed over the Eastern United States. He was flying with four other personnel when he noticed an object below his aircraft, moving in the opposite direction at high speed. For ten to fifteen seconds he tracked it before switching on the recorder. When he zoomed in to get a clearer picture, the object accelerated out of his field of view so quickly he couldn't follow it even at lower magnification. After landing, the crew reviewed the footage. The object appeared rectangular. The pilot wrote that he and the others—people with equal or greater experience than his own—could not identify what they had seen.

One of the more concrete incidents in the batch involved a nuclear weapons facility. In September 2015, two officers at Pantex, a Department of Energy installation near Amarillo, Texas, were on patrol when an unidentified object entered the airspace above the site. The facility went into lockdown. The officers pursued the object in their vehicle, but couldn't close the distance. They stopped, got out, and watched. The object made no sound. Through binoculars, they could see no propulsion system of any kind. After one to two minutes of observation, it continued north, away from the facility, and disappeared.

The files also included footage from 2020 over the Atlantic Ocean. A Navy weapons systems officer described an object that was dark maroon in color, roughly twelve to fifteen feet tall, and structurally resembled a large, somewhat misshapen balloon—though the crew couldn't confirm that as they passed it. The report was filed using what the Navy calls a "range fouler debrief," a standardized form for recording unauthorized intrusions into controlled airspace during active military operations or training.

More recent incidents appear in the batch as well. In 2025, military sensors near China tracked what was described as an area of contrast resembling a six-pointed star over the Yellow Sea. Another video captured tracking of an object over the East China Sea that persisted for several minutes.

The historical material reaches back further still. Included in the release is a transcript from a 1949 conference held in Los Alamos, New Mexico, where top physicists and scientists—many of whom had worked on the Manhattan Project—gathered to discuss "green fireballs" that had been observed over the nuclear laboratory. They attempted to explain the sightings. One theory proposed they were meteors entering the atmosphere, but a prominent astronomer countered that nothing resembling these observations had ever been documented in cases of meteorite falls.

About half the files in this batch are dated 2010 or later, mostly consisting of infrared video captured by military cameras showing unexplained objects and encounters from locations around the world—the western Pacific, the Atlantic, the Middle East. The Pentagon posted all the material on its UFO website, which was established following an executive order signed by President Trump earlier in the year. A Pentagon spokesman said the releases will continue. More files are being prepared for disclosure.

Unlike anything I had seen in my 28 years of performing for the Air Force and Navy
— Navy aviator, 2019 incident report
The object did not make any sound. Furthermore, they were unable to identify any type of propulsion system on the object while using binoculars
— Energy Department report on Pantex facility incident, 2015
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Inventor

Why does the Pentagon keep releasing these files now, after so long?

Model

The executive order created a mechanism for systematic disclosure. Before, these reports were scattered across different agencies and classification levels. Now there's a process, a website, a timeline.

Inventor

What strikes you most about the Navy pilot's account?

Model

That he couldn't explain it. Twenty-eight years of experience, and he's watching something move in ways that don't match anything in his reference frame. That's not hysteria—that's a trained observer hitting the edge of his own knowledge.

Inventor

The Pantex incident seems significant. A nuclear facility.

Model

It is. Two officers, broad daylight, no sound, no visible propulsion. They had time to observe it carefully. And then it just left. The fact that it happened at a nuclear weapons site adds weight, but also raises questions about why it took a decade to release the report.

Inventor

Could these be classified military technology from other countries?

Model

That's always possible. But the 1949 Los Alamos conference suggests this isn't new. Physicists couldn't explain green fireballs then either. If it's foreign tech, it's been foreign tech for a very long time.

Inventor

What does "more releases forthcoming" actually mean?

Model

It means this isn't the end of the story. There are more files. More incidents. The Pentagon is committing to transparency on a schedule, which is different from what happened before.

Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CBS News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ