Middle East crisis splits African economies between immediate pain and uncertain futures

Widespread fuel shortages and energy rationing affecting millions of African households and businesses; potential food security risks if conflict persists beyond current storage capacity.
hostage to a de-escalation that never seems to arrive
African nations split between those already suffering fuel shortages and those waiting in uncertainty for the conflict to end.

Six weeks into a war reshaping global energy flows, Africa finds itself divided not by choice but by geography and economic structure — oil-importing nations on the Indian Ocean rim already rationing fuel and dimming their streets, while oil exporters watch inflation erode the wealth beneath their feet. The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow passage carrying one-fifth of the world's crude, has become the fulcrum on which the continent's stability now rests. This is not merely a story of rising prices; it is a story of how distant conflicts arrive uninvited into the daily lives of millions who had no hand in starting them.

  • Fuel costs have surged between 30 and 150 percent across Africa, with Somalia bearing the sharpest blow — numbers that translate directly into darkened homes, idled trucks, and governments scrambling for answers they do not have.
  • Egypt has already moved from policy debate to visible scarcity, shutting down street lights and mandating that shops, restaurants, and wedding halls close by 9 p.m. — the quiet architecture of a crisis that has stopped being theoretical.
  • Even oil-producing nations like Nigeria and Angola are not insulated: global energy inflation ripples through every economy regardless of what lies beneath the ground, and their citizens are paying more at the pump despite sitting atop crude reserves.
  • Food security hangs in the balance — fertilizer, like oil, moves through the Strait of Hormuz, and while current storage buys time, a prolonged conflict could exhaust those reserves before the farming season ends.
  • Governments face an impossible arithmetic: expand fuel subsidies to prevent social unrest and risk fiscal collapse, or hold the line on budgets and risk the streets.
  • The crisis is quietly accelerating a longer reckoning — African policymakers are now thinking about energy security in harder, more sovereign terms, with domestic refining capacity and regional infrastructure moving from aspiration to urgent necessity.

Six weeks into the war between the US, Israel, and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz has been closed twice — and the consequences are now reshaping daily life across a continent far from the front lines. One-fifth of the world's crude oil passes through that narrow chokepoint, and a significant share flows toward East Africa and Asia. Countries like Ethiopia, Kenya, and Egypt are already experiencing acute fuel shortages. West African nations have been spared the supply disruption, but not the price shock — fuel costs have risen between 30 and 70 percent across much of the continent, and in Somalia, by 150 percent.

The crisis is splitting Africa into two distinct groups. Oil-importing nations are suffering most visibly. Egypt has implemented energy rationing: street lighting reduced, businesses ordered to close by 9 p.m. These are not emergency gestures — they are the daily shape of scarcity. Oil-producing nations like Nigeria, Angola, and Gabon face a different but real problem. They are not short of crude, yet their citizens pay more for fuel, because global energy inflation does not respect national reserves. When energy costs spike everywhere, every economy absorbs the blow.

There is a temptation to project catastrophe. During the Ukraine war and the Covid-19 pandemic, analysts forecast devastation in Africa that did not fully materialize. The current crisis carries similar risks of overestimation. Fertilizer — another commodity flowing through the strait — is critical for agriculture, but many African nations store it carefully, and existing supplies can sustain the current farming season. Food insecurity is a genuine risk, not yet an inevitability.

What is already clear is that prolonged conflict would force harder choices. Governments would face pressure to expand subsidies at the cost of fiscal stability. Nations without domestic refining capacity — many in West and Central Africa — would grow more vulnerable even if they produce crude, because they depend on imported refined products. But the crisis is also accelerating a longer shift: energy policy in Africa is moving from questions of affordability toward harder questions of sovereignty and resilience, with domestic refining and regional infrastructure now treated as strategic imperatives rather than distant ambitions.

For now, the continent waits in two states at once — some already paying the price in rationing and shortages, others suspended in uncertainty, hostages to a peace that exists only in hope.

Six weeks into the war between the US, Israel, and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz has been closed twice—first by Iran, then by an American blockade on the remaining ships using Iranian ports. The headlines speak of rising fuel costs worldwide. But beneath that familiar story lies something more intricate: a crisis that is splitting Africa into two distinct groups, one already suffering acute shortages, the other waiting in uncertainty for a de-escalation that never quite arrives.

The strait is a chokepoint through which one-fifth of the world's crude oil passes. A significant portion flows toward Asia and East Africa, which means countries positioned near the Indian Ocean—Ethiopia, Kenya, Egypt, and parts of southern Africa—are already experiencing fuel shortages. West African nations facing the Atlantic have been spared the supply disruptions, but the price shock has reached everywhere. Fuel costs have climbed between 30 and 70 percent across much of the continent. In Somalia, the increase has reached 150 percent. These are not abstract numbers. They translate into households paying more for electricity, businesses struggling with transport costs, and governments watching their budgets strain under pressure they did not anticipate.

But the crisis does not affect all African economies equally. The distinction lies in a simple fact: some countries import all the oil they consume, while others produce it. Egypt, which imports its oil, has already moved to ration energy. Street lighting has been reduced. Shops, restaurants, shopping centers, cinemas, theaters, and wedding halls must close by 9 p.m. to conserve electricity. These are not temporary measures—they are the visible architecture of scarcity. Oil-producing nations like Nigeria, Angola, Gabon, and Congo-Brazzaville face a different problem. They are not short of crude, but they are not immune. Nigeria operates one of the world's largest oil refineries, yet its citizens pay more for fuel. The reason is straightforward: energy costs have spiked globally, and that inflation ripples through every economy, whether you pump oil from the ground or not.

Energy touches everything. It powers electricity grids, fuels vehicles, heats homes, runs factories. When energy becomes expensive, inflation follows. Households feel it immediately. Businesses adjust by raising prices or cutting hours. Governments face pressure to subsidize fuel and electricity to prevent social unrest—but subsidies are expensive, and prolonged conflict could force them to choose between fiscal stability and public welfare.

There is a tendency, when discussing poor countries facing global shocks, to assume the worst. During the early days of the Ukraine war, analysts projected widespread hunger across Africa because of disruptions to grain and oil supplies. Those projections did not materialize. The Covid-19 pandemic, similarly, was expected to be catastrophic in Africa but proved less severe than in wealthier nations with more advanced health systems. The current crisis carries similar risks of overestimation. Fertilizer, another critical commodity passing through the strait, is essential for agriculture, but its impact is seasonal. Many African countries with agricultural economies take storage seriously. Even if the conflict drags on, stored fertilizer can sustain farming through the current season. Food insecurity is a real risk, but it is not inevitable—not yet.

What becomes clear, though, is that prolonged conflict would force deeper changes. Governments would need to expand subsidies, straining already fragile budgets. Countries without sufficient refining capacity—and many in West and Central Africa fall into this category—would face supply disruptions even if they produce their own crude, because they must import refined products. But there is also a longer-term shift underway. Before this crisis, energy policy in Africa focused on affordability, reliability, and clean sources. Now, policymakers are rightly thinking about energy security in harder terms: how to reduce vulnerability to external shocks beyond their control. This may mean African nations investing in domestic refining capacity and regional processing infrastructure, moving away from dependence on distant suppliers.

For now, the continent exists in two states simultaneously. Some countries are already paying the price in fuel shortages and rationing. Others remain in limbo, waiting for a de-escalation that seems always imminent but never arrives. If the conflict persists and fertilizer stores deplete before the farming season ends, that second group will join the first. Until then, they are hostages to a peace that exists only in hope.

Energy is needed for daily activities: for electricity, for fuel for your car. In the immediate term, the impact is quite hurtful to households, businesses, and the budgets of governments.
— Dr. Zainab Usman, Centre on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University
Many countries now realise that energy security should be top of mind for them. Before this crisis, energy policy was mostly around how do we make electricity affordable, reliable, accessible. Now, many policymakers are rightly going to focus on energy security that looks beyond developmental goals.
— Dr. Zainab Usman
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does the Strait of Hormuz matter so much to Africa? It's thousands of miles away.

Model

Because one-fifth of the world's crude oil passes through it, and a significant chunk flows to East Africa and Asia. If you're in Kenya or Ethiopia, that strait is your supply line. When it closes, your fuel doesn't arrive.

Inventor

But Nigeria produces oil. Why is Nigeria suffering?

Model

Nigeria has crude, but it doesn't have the refining capacity to turn that crude into the fuel people actually use. So even oil-producing countries have to import refined products. And when global energy prices spike—which they have—everyone pays more, whether they pump oil or not.

Inventor

Egypt has shut down shops at 9 p.m. That sounds extreme.

Model

It is. But when you import all your oil and your supply line is disrupted, you have to ration. Street lighting, commercial electricity—these are the levers governments pull when they're desperate to conserve.

Inventor

Will this cause a food crisis?

Model

Not necessarily. People assume it will, but they assumed the same thing during the Ukraine war and it didn't happen. Fertilizer is important, but its impact is seasonal. Many African countries store fertilizer deliberately. If the conflict ends soon, farming continues normally.

Inventor

What if it doesn't end soon?

Model

Then you're looking at depleted storage, a farming season that needs fertilizer, and real food insecurity. But we're not there yet. Right now, some countries are already hurting, and others are waiting to see what happens.

Inventor

Is there anything positive here?

Model

Yes. Policymakers are now thinking about energy security in ways they weren't before. That might mean investing in regional refining capacity, developing domestic resources, reducing dependence on distant suppliers. The crisis is forcing a reckoning with vulnerability.

Contact Us FAQ