You said there was chemistry between us. Whoever announced this didn't come from you or me.
USTR recommended 25% tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing concerns over digital commerce policies, illegal deforestation, and unfair trade practices. Lula claims the tariff announcement violates a May agreement with Trump and suggests Bolsonaro family lobbying in Washington influenced the decision.
- USTR recommended 25% tariffs on all Brazilian imports except beef, coffee, certain fruits, spices, oil, and metal ores
- Lula and Trump agreed in May to give their trade ministers 30 days to negotiate
- Public hearings scheduled for July 6, 2026; corrective measures deadline July 15, 2026
- Brazilian government alleges Senator Flávio Bolsonaro's recent Washington visit influenced the tariff recommendation
President Lula demands direct communication with Trump to clarify a proposed 25% tariff on all Brazilian imports, citing a prior agreement for 30-day negotiations between their administrations.
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is waiting for a phone call from Donald Trump. On Tuesday, June 2nd, he said so publicly, standing in Goiás at the inauguration of a university hospital, his frustration barely contained behind the casual phrasing. The call, he explained, is necessary to clear up a mess that arrived the night before: the U.S. Trade Representative had just recommended slapping 25 percent tariffs on virtually every product Brazil ships to America.
Lula framed the problem as a breach of understanding. In May, the two presidents had met and, by his account, agreed to give their trade ministers thirty days to negotiate. That window was supposed to remain open. Instead, someone—not Trump himself, Lula was careful to note, and not Lula either—had announced these tariffs. The Brazilian president invoked the chemistry Trump had spoken of between them, the rapport that supposedly existed. "You said there was chemistry between us," Lula said. "Whoever announced this didn't come from you or me." He demanded an explanation for what had happened in both men's absence from the negotiating table.
The tariff proposal itself was sweeping. The USTR document, released late Monday night, targeted Brazil's policies on digital commerce, electronic payment services, unfair preferential tariffs, anti-corruption enforcement, intellectual property protection, ethanol market access, and illegal deforestation. The agency determined these practices were unreasonable and burdened American trade, making them actionable under Section 301 of U.S. trade law—a tool that allows Washington to investigate and retaliate against what it deems unfair trading. A handful of Brazilian exports would escape the 25 percent hit: beef, coffee, certain fruits and nuts, spices, oil, and metal ores. Everything else faced the full weight of the tariff.
The U.S. government signaled it would not move immediately. Public hearings are scheduled for July 6th. The deadline for implementing what the USTR calls "corrective measures" is July 15th. That timeline gave Brazil a window, however narrow, to make its case.
The Brazilian government responded with a statement that used the word "indignation." Officials alleged that the investigation itself—initiated in July 2025—had been triggered by the Bolsonaro family, Trump's political allies in Brazil. They pointed specifically to a recent trip Senator Flávio Bolsonaro made to Washington to meet with Trump. The government statement suggested this visit had direct influence on the tariff recommendation. It accused what it called "false patriots" holding public office of conspiring against national interests, and it characterized the tariffs as politically motivated punishment designed to damage employment and income generation in Brazil.
The federal government said it hoped the USTR recommendations would not become actual tariffs. But it also made clear it was prepared to take whatever measures necessary to protect the economy and Brazilian workers if the tariffs took effect. The language was measured but the implication was unmistakable: retaliation was on the table.
Lula's public call for Trump to phone him was unusual—a president essentially demanding a direct conversation to resolve a trade crisis, broadcast to journalists rather than conducted in private channels. It suggested that the normal diplomatic machinery had stalled, that something had broken in the relationship between the two leaders, or at least in the understanding they thought they had reached just weeks earlier. The next move, for now, belonged to Trump.
Citações Notáveis
You said there was chemistry between us. Whoever announced this didn't come from you or me. This agreement cannot have your approval, because we both agreed on 30 days to get a response about what we proposed.— President Lula da Silva
This investigation was initiated in July 2025 by provocation from the Bolsonaro family and is associated with an attempt to interfere in our country's internal affairs.— Brazilian federal government statement
A Conversa do Hearth Outra perspectiva sobre a história
Why did Lula choose to make this demand public instead of picking up the phone himself?
Because he needed to signal something to his own audience and to Washington simultaneously. A public statement puts pressure on Trump—it says the Brazilian president is not going to quietly absorb this. It also tells Brazilians that he's fighting for them, not negotiating in the dark.
Do you think the Bolsonaro family connection is real, or is that just Lula deflecting?
The timing is real. Flávio Bolsonaro did visit Washington recently. Whether it directly caused the tariff recommendation is harder to prove. But the USTR investigation started in July 2025, which is well before Lula took office. So there's a longer story here about who's been pushing this.
What does the thirty-day agreement actually mean if the USTR can just recommend tariffs anyway?
It means someone in the Trump administration didn't feel bound by it, or didn't know about it, or disagreed with it. That's the real problem. The agreement existed at the presidential level, but the trade machinery moved independently.
If these tariffs go through, what happens to Brazil?
Beef, coffee, fruit exports take a hit. But more broadly, it signals that Trump's relationship with Lula is transactional and fragile. Other countries will notice. Brazil will have to decide whether to retaliate or absorb the damage.
Is there any chance this gets resolved before July 6th?
Only if Trump calls. And only if he's willing to override his own trade office. That's the real question—whether he sees the political cost of damaging relations with Brazil as worth whatever he thinks he gains from the tariffs.