NASA rebrands lunar missions, unveils rovers and drones for Moon Base

marking what NASA is calling the base perimeter
Three Moonfall drones will be positioned at the corners of the lunar base's operational area, raising questions about territorial control.

Three robotic missions already in development are now branded as Moon Base 1-3, with Blue Origin, Astrobotic, and Intuitive Machines launching through 2026. NASA contracted Astrolab and Lunar Outpost to build rovers capable of 200km range and remote operation, partnering with General Motors for advanced lunar terrain vehicles.

  • Three robotic missions rebranded as Moon Base 1-3, launching through end of 2026
  • Rovers capable of 200km range and 10 km/h speed, four times farther than any previous lunar vehicle
  • Moonfall drones—experimental reusable rockets—will mark the base perimeter starting in 2029
  • Phase 1 includes 25 missions with 21 landings through 2029
  • Artemis 3 targeted for mid-2027, but contractors say late 2027

NASA rebranded existing commercial lunar missions as part of its Moon Base program and announced contracts for advanced rovers and experimental drones to support future crewed lunar operations.

NASA held a press conference on Tuesday at its Washington headquarters to announce the next phase of its lunar base program, and what emerged was a careful blend of genuine new contracts and strategic rebranding of work already underway. The message was clear: development of an outpost in the Moon's south polar region is moving forward, and the agency is moving fast.

Administrator Jared Isaacman opened the briefing by announcing that three robotic missions previously contracted with private companies would now carry the Moon Base designation. The first, Moon Base 1, will use Blue Origin's Blue Moon Mark 1 lander, scheduled to launch in the Northern Hemisphere's spring—a critical test for the company's crewed lunar landing system, which NASA has also contracted for future astronaut missions. Two additional missions, Moon Base 2 and 3, involve landers from Astrobotic and Intuitive Machines, both companies with prior lunar experience, though neither without complications. Astrobotic's first attempt ended in failure shortly after launch; Intuitive Machines achieved two landings but both vehicles tipped over on the surface, though they continued operating for a time. All three missions should be complete by year's end.

The more substantial announcements came next. Carlos Garcia-Galán, the lunar base program manager, unveiled the rovers that will carry astronauts across the lunar surface once humans arrive. Two companies—Astrolab and Lunar Outpost—won contracts to build these vehicles, which will be capable of transporting two astronauts at speeds up to 10 kilometers per hour with a range of 200 kilometers, four times farther than any rover has traveled on the Moon or anywhere else. General Motors partnered with Lunar Outpost on the project, lending automotive engineering expertise to machines far more sophisticated than the Apollo-era rovers of the 1970s. Notably, these lunar terrain vehicles can operate both remotely, like robotic probes, and under direct astronaut control.

But the most striking announcement involved something that has never been built before: the Moonfall, an experimental lunar drone designed to make short hops across the surface for terrain reconnaissance. Essentially a small, reusable rocket, the Moonfall represents the kind of ambitious robotic engineering that NASA typically assigns to its Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the agency's most daring unmanned missions. The plan calls for three or four of these drones to be positioned at the corners of the lunar base's operational area, marking what NASA is calling the base perimeter. The territorial implications were not lost on reporters in the room.

When asked whether marking a perimeter on the Moon might conflict with the 1967 Outer Space Treaty—the United Nations agreement that prohibits nations from claiming ownership of celestial territory—Isaacman deflected. "We're operating very much aware of the Outer Space Treaty," he said. "We want to go there and explore. But that's an objective of many for these spacecraft. We'll be doing reconnaissance." The answer satisfied no one entirely, but it was the answer given.

The Moonfall drones will be delivered to the lunar surface by Firefly, a company that successfully landed its own lunar module last year. Phase 1 of the base program runs through 2029 and comprises 25 missions, 21 of which will include landings. The existing commercial lunar cargo program, formally called CLPS, will continue with new contracts announced next month, and NASA plans to solicit proposals for an accelerated Phase 2 through June 30.

Lori Glaze, the interim associate administrator, used the occasion to highlight the success of Artemis 2, the first crewed flight beyond Earth orbit since 1972, and announced that the spacecraft and rocket for Artemis 3 are in final integration. That mission, which will carry astronauts to lunar orbit and test the landing systems, remains targeted for mid-2027, though both SpaceX and Blue Origin—the companies building those landing systems—have indicated they won't be ready until the end of 2027. The gap between NASA's timeline and the contractors' timelines is a tension that will likely shape the program's pace in the months ahead.

We're operating very much aware of the Outer Space Treaty. We want to go there and explore. But that's an objective of many for these spacecraft. We'll be doing reconnaissance.
— Jared Isaacman, NASA Administrator, responding to questions about territorial claims
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Inventor

Why rebrand missions that were already planned? What changes by calling them Moon Base 1, 2, and 3?

Model

It's partly messaging—it ties existing work to a larger vision, makes the program feel coherent and intentional. But it also signals to Congress and the public that things are moving. These launches were happening anyway, but now they're part of something bigger.

Inventor

The rovers sound genuinely new. What makes them different from what we've had before?

Model

Range, mostly. Two hundred kilometers is transformative. Apollo rovers could go maybe 50. And the dual-mode operation—remote or crewed—means you can scout ahead robotically before risking astronauts, or operate them if something goes wrong with the crew.

Inventor

Tell me about the Moonfall drones. Why is that the most striking announcement?

Model

Because it's never been done. A reusable rocket that can make multiple hops on the Moon? That's genuinely novel engineering. But also because of what they're using it for—marking a perimeter. That's territorial thinking, even if NASA won't say it that way.

Inventor

Is NASA actually claiming the Moon?

Model

Not legally. The treaty prevents that. But marking a perimeter, controlling access to an area, establishing infrastructure there—that's functional control. It's the difference between a claim and a presence. NASA is being careful with language, but the intent is clear.

Inventor

What about the timeline? Artemis 3 keeps slipping.

Model

The contractors aren't ready. SpaceX and Blue Origin both said late 2027, but NASA wants mid-2027. That gap will either close or it won't, and if it doesn't, the whole crewed program slips. Everything downstream depends on those landing systems working.

Contáctanos FAQ