516 tonnes of CO2 in two weeks—what 78 people produce in a year
In the opening weeks of the 2026 World Cup, FIFA president Gianni Infantino traversed North America aboard a private Gulfstream jet, attending 24 matches across 16 cities in 16 days and generating an estimated 516 tonnes of CO2-equivalent — roughly the annual emissions of 78 people. The journey unfolds against FIFA's own pledges to halve emissions by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2040, raising an ancient and unresolved tension between the ideals institutions proclaim and the choices their leaders make when convenience is on the line. It is a story not merely about aviation fuel, but about the credibility of commitment when accountability is absent.
- A private Gulfstream made 27 flights in 16 days — including a single-day, 5,400-mile triangle across the United States — burning fuel at a rate that produced more carbon in a fortnight than 78 people generate in a year.
- The contradiction is stark: FIFA had publicly pledged 50% emission cuts by 2030 and net-zero by 2040, yet its president's personal travel itinerary reads as a case study in the most carbon-intensive form of transport available.
- Experts warn that private jets emit 5 to 14 times more than commercial flights and 50 times more than trains, and researchers are calling Infantino's choices 'completely at odds' with the environmental leadership FIFA claims to champion.
- FIFA declined to confirm aircraft details or whether any flights were commercial, offering only a vague statement about travel being arranged based on efficiency and cost — a response that has deepened rather than resolved the credibility gap.
- The scrutiny lands on an already fragile record: a Swiss regulator ruled in 2023 that FIFA made 'false statements' about the Qatar World Cup's carbon neutrality, and the 2026 tournament is projected to be the most polluting in World Cup history.
Gianni Infantino spent the first two weeks of the 2026 World Cup crisscrossing North America aboard a Gulfstream G650ER private jet, attending 24 matches spread across 16 host cities in three countries. Between June 11 and June 27, the aircraft made 27 flights covering at least 31,144 miles and more than 66 hours in the air. On some days, Infantino took three separate flights — including one extraordinary day when he flew from Miami to Dallas to Seattle and back to Miami, a journey of roughly 5,400 miles completed within 24 hours.
The carbon arithmetic is difficult to ignore. The Gulfstream burns approximately 1,817 litres of fuel per hour, and based on documented flight times, the jet produced an estimated 516 tonnes of CO2-equivalent during the group stage alone — the equivalent of 78 people's entire annual emissions. FIFA has not disclosed how many passengers were aboard each flight, making per-person calculations impossible.
The contrast with FIFA's stated values is pointed. The governing body had pledged a 50% emissions reduction by 2030 and net-zero by 2040, and its 2026 sustainability strategy spoke of commitment across climate, human rights, and beyond. Yet when the BBC asked FIFA to confirm details about the aircraft or whether any flights were commercial, the organization declined to engage substantively, offering only that travel is arranged based on efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Sustainable transport experts were direct in their assessment. Private jets, they noted, produce 5 to 14 times more emissions than commercial flights and 50 times more than trains. Researchers working with sport climate networks described Infantino's apparent reliance on private aviation as symptomatic of FIFA's broader failings on sustainability — choices, they said, entirely at odds with the leadership the moment demands.
The wider picture sharpens the concern. Scientists projected before the tournament began that the 2026 World Cup could generate nine million tonnes of CO2-equivalent — nearly double the average of the previous four tournaments. This follows a 2023 ruling by a Swiss regulator that FIFA made false statements in claiming the Qatar World Cup was carbon-neutral. Whether the continent-spanning geography of 2026 explains or merely excuses the FIFA president's carbon footprint is a question the organization has yet to meaningfully answer.
Gianni Infantino spent two weeks crisscrossing North America in a private jet, attending 24 World Cup matches spread across three countries and 16 host cities. The Fifa president's aircraft—a Gulfstream G650ER—made 27 flights between June 11 and June 27, covering at least 31,144 miles and spending more than 66 hours in the air. On some days, he took three separate flights to watch matches hundreds of miles apart. The longest single journey was 2,800 miles from Vancouver to Miami on June 13, after watching Australia play Turkey. On June 15, he flew more than 2,700 miles across the country from Miami to Seattle to see Belgium play Egypt, then traveled another 960 miles south to Los Angeles for Iran versus New Zealand the same evening. Three days later, he flew from Miami to Dallas to Seattle and back to Miami—a journey of roughly 5,400 miles completed in a single day, with the plane landing the following morning.
The carbon cost of this itinerary is substantial. The Gulfstream G650ER burns approximately 1,817 litres of fuel per hour. Based on that consumption rate and the documented flight times, the jet produced an estimated 516 tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent during the group stage alone. To contextualize that figure: the global average person generates about 6.56 tonnes of CO2-equivalent per year. Infantino's fortnight of travel produced roughly what 78 people would emit over an entire year. The plane can carry up to 19 passengers, but Fifa has not disclosed how many people were aboard for each flight, making it impossible to calculate per-passenger emissions.
This travel pattern stands in sharp contrast to Fifa's stated environmental commitments. Before the tournament began, the governing body pledged to reduce emissions by 50 percent by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2040. The 2026 World Cup sustainability strategy explicitly stated: "Whether we speak about climate, human rights, diseases or disabilities, we are committed to play our part." Fifa also highlighted that hosting the tournament across three countries would reduce reliance on long-haul travel for attendees and that using existing stadiums would minimize environmental impact. Yet the scale of the tournament—expanded to include more matches than ever before—has created logistical demands that appear to have driven the Fifa president's own carbon-intensive choices.
When asked to confirm details about the aircraft and whether any of Infantino's World Cup flights used commercial airlines, Fifa did not respond. A Fifa representative stated only that the president "routinely travels, together with relevant officials, on business and tournament-related matters" and that travel is "organised on commercial [including low-cost] airlines and sometimes it is on private charter, depending on which is more efficient and cost-effective under the circumstances." The BBC tracked the private jet using plane-tracking data and matched its flight paths with published photographs of Infantino at stadiums in the same cities on the same dates.
Experts in sustainable transport have flagged the contradiction. Denise Auclair, a sustainable travel specialist at the European Federation for Transport and Environment, noted that private jets are five to 14 times more polluting than commercial aircraft and 50 times more polluting than trains. Freddie Daley, a researcher at Sussex University working with the sport climate action network Cool Down, called Infantino's apparent reliance on private aviation "symptomatic of Fifa's failings on the environment and sustainability," adding that the choice "is just completely at odds with the level of leadership that we need to see at the top of Fifa on environmental issues."
The broader context makes the scrutiny sharper. A 2025 report from Scientists for Global Responsibility estimated that the entire 2026 World Cup could generate nine million tonnes of CO2-equivalent—nearly double the average for the previous four tournaments and making this year's event the most polluting World Cup in history. This projection was made before the tournament even began. In 2023, a Swiss regulator had ruled that Fifa made "false statements" when claiming that the 2022 Qatar World Cup would be carbon-neutral through offset investments. Fifa responded by reaffirming its commitment to climate action, but the pattern of high-profile emissions during major tournaments continues to undermine that message.
Infantino attended all 64 matches at the Qatar World Cup, where eight stadiums were separated by roughly an hour's drive. The 2026 tournament presents a fundamentally different geography—one that stretches across a continent and demands far more movement. Whether that logistical reality justifies the carbon footprint of the Fifa president's personal travel, or whether it reveals the limits of Fifa's environmental pledges when tested against the demands of tournament operations, remains an open question.
Citas Notables
The fact that Infantino's choosing to use a private jet is just completely at odds with the level of leadership that we need to see at the top of Fifa on environmental issues.— Freddie Daley, researcher at Sussex University, Cool Down climate action network
Private jets have a completely disproportionate impact. They are five to 14 times more polluting than commercial planes and 50 times more than trains.— Denise Auclair, sustainable travel expert, European Federation for Transport and Environment
La Conversación del Hearth Otra perspectiva de la historia
Why does it matter what one person's carbon footprint is, even if he's the head of Fifa? Isn't the whole tournament the real problem?
Both things are true. The tournament itself is projected to be the most polluting World Cup ever. But Infantino's travel is a symbol—he's the one who signed the sustainability pledge. He's the one saying Fifa is committed to climate action. And then he's using a private jet to attend matches when commercial flights exist.
But couldn't there be a practical reason? Maybe he needed to move fast between matches, attend events, meet with officials?
Possibly. But Fifa won't say. They won't confirm he was even on the jet, won't say how many people traveled with him, won't explain why commercial flights weren't used. The lack of transparency is part of the problem. If there was a good reason, they could explain it.
What's the difference between a private jet and a commercial flight in terms of emissions?
A private jet produces five to fourteen times more emissions per passenger than a commercial plane. And fifty times more than a train. The Gulfstream he used burns about 1,817 litres of fuel per hour. Over two weeks, that added up to 516 tonnes of CO2-equivalent—what roughly 78 people would produce in a year.
So the hypocrisy is the real story here?
It's part of it. But the deeper issue is that Fifa made specific climate commitments—50 percent emissions cuts by 2030, net-zero by 2040. A Swiss regulator already found they made false claims about Qatar 2022 being carbon-neutral. Now we're seeing the same pattern repeat. The pledges don't match the actions.
What happens next? Does this change anything?
That depends on whether anyone holds Fifa accountable. Right now, the tournament is projected to be the most polluting ever. If Infantino's travel is just the visible tip of a much larger problem, then the real question is whether Fifa will actually change how it operates, or whether these pledges remain just words.